**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Comments
Dr. Zola
Some of the things noted in the changelog above are more complex interactions (CB cooldown, HE Sp2, Nebula/Mags, etc.) or things that clearly varied from the champ description (Galan/SS synergy). There’s a lot of other stuff too, but unless I missed it, no flat number reductions like this one. Those things shouldn’t shock anyone because the process of clarifying interactions and fixing unintended ones has been the way this game has worked for years.
Dr. Zola
If this change is a bug fix and not a change that was made to lessen the relic itself then it's the same as what's on picture.
But none of know the answer for sure since it hasn't been listed anywhere. But in true fashion, the community sees a change and immediately jumps off into the deep end. I don't know what it is and I'm not arguing if it's a bug, a text adjustment or a nerf but I'm willing to bet it isn't a nerf.
It's fine to ask questions like "was this intentional" but speculation like "shadow nerfs or silent nerfs" are just ridiculous. We've had one silent nerfs with Bishop but thousands of bugs but everyone always immediately jumps to nerf.
So are the green dots indirect buffs and red dots indirect nerfs? I just want to understand what an indirect nerf/buff is vs a bug fix. The Bishop one seems like a pretty big one.
Dr. Zola
The Moderator is also no longer around to defend themselves.
Whether it was a bug fix or a nerf is all up to semantics. All we know is that the Gambit relic was changed and is probably going to stay that way. I just hope Jax or Miike give some sort of clarification by Monday, because any sort of silent change like this just isn't okay, first time or otherwise.
1. Bugs.
2. Changes happening earlier than they're supposed to.
3. Incorrect text.
With everything above that happens much more frequently, why is silent nerf the very first thought?
Dr. Zola
(Emphasis mine)
Dr. Zola
But I think the folks who reflexively dismiss things like this as “bug” are cut from the same cloth as those who call it a silent nerf. And I think we have gotten way too accepting of “bugs.”
Dr. Zola
People are free to trust them or not. When they make claims on the Forum, they're open to be challenged.
I simply pointed out that it's probably better to wait for more information than cry nerf. You're free to disagree, but what you support is the stance you take.
Dr. Zola
Question is why not say something about it or message lost in transmission?
I do not. There is no "Kabam" in front of my name. I've just been here long enough to hear them say over and over that they don't silently nerf Champs, and still see people keep saying it over and over.
It's really not that difficult to ask them to get someone to look into it instead of digressing into accusations and a delitany of every time we recall in the last 8 and a half years that the information has been different.
Incase it's been missed, I'm trying to help you get information. Not silence anyone.
There's a way of asking, and a way of accusing. One is productive. The other turns into a vent.
17. Don’t accuse fellow Summoners of being 'Kabam Employees' or shills. An opposing comment or observation isn’t a crime, and those types of accusations shut down any constructive discussion within the thread. We promise that Kabam Moderators and Developers will always let you know they are a member of staff. You will know this by their Forum title, Kabam_ModName. We have a ZERO sock puppet policy and will continue to do so.
Shows you can’t think of a single relevant point in the conversation, so would rather immaturely dismiss what they say because you can’t work out a way to argue against the point. Do better.