People Misunderstand
NuHuman_2099
Member Posts: 543
Okay so we have all seen the posts and rants and videos of champions who fall into God, Great, Good or Meh categories.
A very large percentage of the playerbase will likely go Ballistic here once im done, so sit down have a read and please leave your ego at the beginning of the thread.
Everything you have seen is WRONG.
There are NO GOD TIER champions.
There are NO MEH/BAD champions.
YES, some champions get the job done better than others, and heres why;
Its not God, Great, Good, Meh/Bad.
Its a difficulty system.
You think im wrong or full of S***?
Have a think.
Heres some in the Easy category.
Hyperion, Star Lord, Blade, Scarlet Witch, Thor and Hulk. These champions are considered God by a lot of players. WRONG. They are simple and yes very effective, BUT, Dont think you have actual skill when using these champions as your using champions dumbed down to pure damage and health basis. EASY.
So what about Meh/Bad champions?
Ant-Man, Carnage, Collosus, Luke Cage, Sentry.
These champions all have a certain way to really make them stand out. (Sure Collosus might actually not be any good but hes here so deal with it)
These champions are very difficult to use and succeed frequently. This takes SKILL, and PRECISION. These champions are HARD champions.
Have a think ladies and gentlemen....
I hope I have opened a few eyes, especially Meta Grinders who have to watch youtube to be any good at this game.
Why have I done this?
Because for so long now I have been told that I can only use champions like Star Lord, Hyperion, Scarlett Witch for fights because they stomp all.
I have taken teams of the Hard champions or 'Meh/Bad' against the likes of Maestro or even through Act V. Carnage, Ant-Man, Thor (Jane Foster), Vulture and Spider-Gwen.
These people succeed. They are overlooked because no-one in this game plays specific champions because they like them or they're favorites from comics, most the players grind the Meta and this games meta puts Easy-to-use champions as Gods.
Enjoy people. Enjoy.
A very large percentage of the playerbase will likely go Ballistic here once im done, so sit down have a read and please leave your ego at the beginning of the thread.
Everything you have seen is WRONG.
There are NO GOD TIER champions.
There are NO MEH/BAD champions.
YES, some champions get the job done better than others, and heres why;
Its not God, Great, Good, Meh/Bad.
Its a difficulty system.
You think im wrong or full of S***?
Have a think.
Heres some in the Easy category.
Hyperion, Star Lord, Blade, Scarlet Witch, Thor and Hulk. These champions are considered God by a lot of players. WRONG. They are simple and yes very effective, BUT, Dont think you have actual skill when using these champions as your using champions dumbed down to pure damage and health basis. EASY.
So what about Meh/Bad champions?
Ant-Man, Carnage, Collosus, Luke Cage, Sentry.
These champions all have a certain way to really make them stand out. (Sure Collosus might actually not be any good but hes here so deal with it)
These champions are very difficult to use and succeed frequently. This takes SKILL, and PRECISION. These champions are HARD champions.
Have a think ladies and gentlemen....
I hope I have opened a few eyes, especially Meta Grinders who have to watch youtube to be any good at this game.
Why have I done this?
Because for so long now I have been told that I can only use champions like Star Lord, Hyperion, Scarlett Witch for fights because they stomp all.
I have taken teams of the Hard champions or 'Meh/Bad' against the likes of Maestro or even through Act V. Carnage, Ant-Man, Thor (Jane Foster), Vulture and Spider-Gwen.
These people succeed. They are overlooked because no-one in this game plays specific champions because they like them or they're favorites from comics, most the players grind the Meta and this games meta puts Easy-to-use champions as Gods.
Enjoy people. Enjoy.
Post edited by Kabam Vydious on
59
Comments
Frankly, I am in awe of the skill some of these players on Youtube demonstrate. And a bit jealous, too.
And the same champion that is a category in defense, is another category in offense.
I do agree that it is a matter of skill, judging by my not very successful 4 star Blade. But that "easyness" in which they handle the fights is what makes them better. So yes, in a way, "god-tier" is not a proper adjective for a champion as only the person using him makes him belong in one or another category.
Having said that, my 5 star King Groot takes forever to finish a fight. Now, I am not sure in which categories he is placing right now, but if I cannot use him in Act V, then he is not "godly" or "easy".
What would be the point of taking a low-damage output champion to Act V? The longer the fight, the more chances you have to make a mistake.
So it really doesn't matter the name of the category, those "easy-godly" champions are the ones you actually need to save time and money.
You can take Antman to the Labyrinth all you like, no one will stop you from succeeding with him. It will just take you around 16 hours to finish it.
Would you throw in star rating and rank to your point as well? I learned a lot from completing RTTL Act 4 and Story Quest Act 4 with 3*s (some, not all), master event quests with 4* 3/30s, and Act 5.1 exploration with 4* 4/40s. I agree with your comment, though playing more difficult content with lower star and lower ranked champs was my best teacher with learning how to play with skill.
A couple of the best players I know had horrible luck coming up with their pulls, but they didn't let that stop them from doing content. It actually helped them develop skills so that when they finally pulled one of the good ones, they were pretty much unstoppable then.
That doesn't mean there aren't tiers of champs though, it just means that you can develop better skills by using lower tier champs more frequently to hone your skills.
But in any competitive part of the game, champ effectiveness is super heightened and important, so that is the reason the lists get made and debated so much. Fight LoL with your Colossus on your own time, don’t bring that weaker, less effective champ (I mean, he is certainly no Cyclops) to AW offense.
I could use my car to haul gravel but my truck is better at it because it can do the job faster and more efficiently.
Gamora has nothing going for her. Her “guaranteed crits specials” hit for less than most. Specials bleed is exactly the same with special 1&2 so you are forced to use special one to try and increase the damage. If you dupe her her specials may hit hard once per fight which is useless in end game content.
Angela has fury, regeneration, armour up, one of the hardest hitting special 3s, heavy attack increased damage ... etc.
The same player would benefit much more from Angela than Gamora. I useful that example because I got 6* Gamora and 5* Angela. I ranked Angela to 5*. I have the same skill as myself obviously, Gamora doesn’t take skill to master anyway. Gamora is garbage, Angela is great.
hahaha.....I dare u to take carnage she hulk and colossus in map 6. 1 poison immune 1 bleed immune champ as well. Since you say people who use god tier champs have little skill why don't u use these 3 champs in map 6 and complete 3 routes all the days without using items.
I think you have some interesting ideas, and do agree about players ignoring some champs because they haave a built in bias or decide that if the champ is not on the "god tier" list it is worth nothing.
But as far as arrogant goes....your OP tells us to "leave our ego at the beginning of the thread"...then proceeds to lecture us like we are idiot children...and finishes with the insanely pretentious "Enjoy people. Enjoy". Followed up with the above quoted post where you pretty much say that anyone that disagrees with you is arrogant.
I cannot tell if you were just overly-defensive about putting a new idea out there? Or if this is just trolling done very well....
I don’t overlook carnage because some bloke on YouTube told me to. I overlook carnage because he is absolutely dire.