**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
You should have titled it ''My personal tier list''
If you have tried all the champs on the same map/path, you must have missed a few thing.
However, your champ rankings is really bad! You did say though that you dont have much experience with new champs but I think it's a lot more than just new. You need to get to know most of these champs. I'd say review your list and consult a friend or some alliance mates and seek their opinions as well.
It take efforts to put together something like this, so good job.
Tip: Will be easier if you list the champs by class. Will make it easy locating a champ.
For example, list them in terms of which are the best for war defense, since Korg may be a decent defender, but is absolutely useless if you want to use him to clear Abyss or even anything in Act 6.
Also, if I want to know which champs are best for the "can't touch this" path in aq, venom should pretty much top that list in my opinion.
Your list will not help me decide who to rank up if I have a specific need. Which then begs the question, what's the point of the list?
I think he doesn't have all these Champs. Kang and Thanos? Really?
Maybe he doesn't have Star Lord too.
Could go on, but that list needs some work IMO.
First, isolate ghost and quake as they are exceptions. If you are skilled enough (and in ghost’s case, have the full synergy team) they can handle almost every challenge in game. If there is such a thing as best champs, it’s them.
Second, god tier should be limited to 2 or 3 champs per class. The very best who are usually the best options in most situations. Doom, Corvus, warlock, omega, nick fury, thing, just to give an example.
It is a mistake itself to think there's a "correct" way to judge champions and a "wrong" way. People are going to disagree about how valuable champions are, and on what criteria to even judge them. The only interesting thing is the thought process behind the judgments, not the judgments themselves. So before jumping directly to a complete list of all the champions and how valuable they are, I should ask just exactly how much thought did you put into each and every champion. How much testing have you done with each champion, and in what ways. How much discussion have you had with other players about these champions.
You say the spreadsheet is supposed to be a guide. A guide to what? What do you want players to get out of it? They can only get what you put in. So if this is something you want to do, consider how you would explain to someone what you put into it. What was the thought process behind it. When do you think a champion is better or worse. You don't have to be an end game player to produce something useful, nor do you have to know everything about every champ. But you shouldn't gloss over what you don't know either.