Only reason that you should ever kick someone the day before rewards is if they absolutely don't deserve them(joining AW and not moving, placing 2* defense...)
Only reason that you should ever kick someone the day before rewards is if they absolutely don't deserve them(joining AW and not moving, placing 2* defense...)
It's the leadership who defines what deserves mean.
@Shamir51 dunno, but by the way they are acting, I should think that they are 6
Only reason I ask is because of the message you were sent. In my experience, it’s mostly kids that act in this manner. I’d recommend finding an alliance with an older member base. Not saying they’re ALL better, but generally speaking they’re free of this sort of behaviour.
Honestly there should be some kinda system where after the season of aw ends, you just can't kick anyone before rewards reach out to everyone. Would still leave one thing - mid season kickouts. But post season pre reward distribution kicking just feels like such a cheap shot
I don't agree, there are certain things that justify kicking before rewards. It all comes down to how the leadership runs the alliance.
And those certain things are barely ever the reason for kicking. One can't make the decision to kick someone on the last war. So how about they kick them before the start of the last war? Would still be used by sad souls to just be cheap. A solid number of kicking before rewards cases are just purely based on animosity etc for no justifiable reason.
Honestly there should be some kinda system where after the season of aw ends, you just can't kick anyone before rewards reach out to everyone. Would still leave one thing - mid season kickouts. But post season pre reward distribution kicking just feels like such a cheap shot
I don't agree, there are certain things that justify kicking before rewards. It all comes down to how the leadership runs the alliance.
And those certain things are barely ever the reason for kicking. One can't make the decision to kick someone on the last war. So how about they kick them before the start of the last war? Would still be used by sad souls to just be cheap. A solid number of kicking before rewards cases are just purely based on animosity etc for no justifiable reason.
Like I said, leadership defines what the line is between kicking and keeping, even on the last war. It's not for kabam to be involved in, which is why they aren't involved with alliance issues. If you don't like the leadership and the way they run things, time for a change. That is the power leadership has, justified or not. It's on you as a player to determine if you want to be part of an alliance with their rule set.
I don’t agree with what you are saying those guys did but...
If the leader wasn’t aligned to the kicking of folks before season rewards as a repercussion then you overstepped your role as officer. You may have been right but in the end in the alliance structure that wasn’t your decision. I would never do a move like that without alignment of the leader and the majority of officers. It’s his alliance at the top and the moves should be worked through him(that’s why he is the leader).
Either way sounds like you are better off finding a new alliance that won’t put you in that position.
Oh @Timone147, did you not read it? The officers and pretty much everyone in the ally saw what happened. Also the leader said that in that situation, it is ok to kick
Honestly there should be some kinda system where after the season of aw ends, you just can't kick anyone before rewards reach out to everyone. Would still leave one thing - mid season kickouts. But post season pre reward distribution kicking just feels like such a cheap shot
I don't agree, there are certain things that justify kicking before rewards. It all comes down to how the leadership runs the alliance.
And those certain things are barely ever the reason for kicking. One can't make the decision to kick someone on the last war. So how about they kick them before the start of the last war? Would still be used by sad souls to just be cheap. A solid number of kicking before rewards cases are just purely based on animosity etc for no justifiable reason.
Like I said, leadership defines what the line is between kicking and keeping, even on the last war. It's not for kabam to be involved in, which is why they aren't involved with alliance issues. If you don't like the leadership and the way they run things, time for a change. That is the power leadership has, justified or not. It's on you as a player to determine if you want to be part of an alliance with their rule set.
Whatever. Although the last part of your comment - you almost never get to know what they define as the line. And by the time you get to know the "rule set" of the alliance, you're already out because noone mentions something like "I don't like you but I don't have a valid reason, here take kick lmao". And noone can ever figure that out before joining an alliance or before getting kicked randomly (unless someone else is unfortunate enough) But I get why kabam stays away from alliance stuff. Just frustrating to see this kinda stuff
Honestly there should be some kinda system where after the season of aw ends, you just can't kick anyone before rewards reach out to everyone. Would still leave one thing - mid season kickouts. But post season pre reward distribution kicking just feels like such a cheap shot
I don't agree, there are certain things that justify kicking before rewards. It all comes down to how the leadership runs the alliance.
And those certain things are barely ever the reason for kicking. One can't make the decision to kick someone on the last war. So how about they kick them before the start of the last war? Would still be used by sad souls to just be cheap. A solid number of kicking before rewards cases are just purely based on animosity etc for no justifiable reason.
Like I said, leadership defines what the line is between kicking and keeping, even on the last war. It's not for kabam to be involved in, which is why they aren't involved with alliance issues. If you don't like the leadership and the way they run things, time for a change. That is the power leadership has, justified or not. It's on you as a player to determine if you want to be part of an alliance with their rule set.
Whatever. Although the last part of your comment - you almost never get to know what they define as the line. And by the time you get to know the "rule set" of the alliance, you're already out because noone mentions something like "I don't like you but I don't have a valid reason, here take kick lmao". And noone can ever figure that out before joining an alliance or before getting kicked randomly (unless someone else is unfortunate enough) But I get why kabam stays away from alliance stuff. Just frustrating to see this kinda stuff
Your experience is way different then. I've had recruits ask about rule sets and when kicking is necessary. I also bring the same thing up to recruits I talk to. Again, it's on players to determine whatever they can to make sure the alliance is right for them.
There are certain things that give you the right the boot someone with no warning, individual harassment, for whatever reason/cause, is one of them. It sucks that you fell through the cracks, most alliances aren’t like that.
You’re still very early in your progression so it’s not likely you’d have stayed much longer with them anyway and it’s always better to find out someone is an arse before investing too much time and effort into them.
Find yourself and alliance that’s focussed on AQ doing map 3-4 and just work on the story and any side events you can over war as 8 champs out of your roster is probably a fairly large commitment at the moment.
i am a leader and no officer acts with kicking people not mentioning a mass kick such actions are always first discussed with me because leading 30 people is not only aq and aw there is lot diplomacy and tactics needed to keep an alliance going and mentaly healthy
you should have discussed it first with the leader
He said leader wasnt active and when he tried contacting him he didnt reply
Comments
It's the leadership who defines what deserves mean.
Sorry you missed out on rewards mate
If the leader wasn’t aligned to the kicking of folks before season rewards as a repercussion then you overstepped your role as officer. You may have been right but in the end in the alliance structure that wasn’t your decision. I would never do a move like that without alignment of the leader and the majority of officers. It’s his alliance at the top and the moves should be worked through him(that’s why he is the leader).
Either way sounds like you are better off finding a new alliance that won’t put you in that position.
But I get why kabam stays away from alliance stuff. Just frustrating to see this kinda stuff
You’re still very early in your progression so it’s not likely you’d have stayed much longer with them anyway and it’s always better to find out someone is an arse before investing too much time and effort into them.
Find yourself and alliance that’s focussed on AQ doing map 3-4 and just work on the story and any side events you can over war as 8 champs out of your roster is probably a fairly large commitment at the moment.