kabam asks for the opinions of others about guilltone and at the same time discards them.
Diaz1505
Member Posts: 31 ★
I find the offered answer somewhat hostile. Most of the community have left good points of view where changes could be made to the guillotine and have even offered new ideas about it to implement them in it so that it really has a good utility. Well, the utility it had before (the little ) was taken away! with this new update. And I don't even have the pleasure of expressing it as an upgrade, it just looks like a nerf! And at the end of it all so much effort to be heard so that they do nothing and discard the thoughts of others? woo kabam what a lot of attention you give to your community!
36
Comments
Someone who behaves in a hostile way towards another person is because they are being provocative or unpleasant. and in the context in which I use this word it is in its second definition (The unfriendly term refers to a person who lacks sympathy, so it is a person who generates animosity or rejection in other individuals for different reasons.)
and that agrees with what I have expressed.
Like all Community Ideas that could make a really amazing game, but, we are here being ignored by Kabam
The AMA should be much meaningful if the champ designer explain why those suggestions by players in gully feedback post are not taken, what's the limitations and etc. Rather than the current handling, which gives me a feeling that the champ designer don't really look into details of those points discussed in the feedback post and just simply jump into conclusion that "your feedback are acknowledged but please don't expect any major changes"....... is that sounds like the speech from most of the owners' side during negotiation with labour union? What's your thought process?
I don't know if Kabam Brocolli set too high bar on what a champ designer should be, but his interview provides more meaningful information to the community.
I think a lot of players (at least for those commenting in gully feedback post) are not expecting Kabam would turn gully into "god-tier" but rather hope to keep her play styles, or just revert her old play styles if Kabam can't really buff her.
I think you don't see the difference between listening to players and obeying the players. Kabam does the first
you are free to search for yourself the definition or meaning of hostile
but if it is synonymous with antipathy, which is the 2 definition that acquires hostile that's the reason why I explained the context
That help never comes from Kabam, EVER. They are just the babysitters on here, the players are who give them a job.
From the beginning they never mentioned any intention to fix Guillotine. They didn't even hint at it (as far as I know, you are welcome to prove me wrong with a quote that says otherwise).
I think it’s ok to point that this type of decision is shortsighted, especially at a time when the general satisfaction for the game is at an incredible low point due to the bugs. But they are probably operating in an environment where the overall state of the game doesn’t impact on individual decisions like this. The problem is, as a player when you ‘feel’ like everything in this game is going in the wrong direction, or is broken everything decision Kabam makes will be seen with extra negativity.
So I don’t think the response is hostile, I just think the the decision overall is poor.
If you look at the conversation threads, Kabam Mike opens the thread: (Guillotine, a community choice champion, and nerf? Are you happy with this perk?) It's clear that the intent behind the poll is to know what areas he's in. the problem. to see if it can be solved. It is not necessary to write a complete text of what you think to understand the expressions or intentions through questions and arguments. (This is called expressing ideas.)
Second, what is the function of this forum? Just read someone's comment and get rid of them in the next moment? well, Kabam had better redefine the purpose of the forum from the perspective you want to express.
Third, if you answer: we will consider that in the future. It is a crude way of responding and turning a blind eye to a problem without taking any action to resolve it.
There's absolutely no reason to have these AMA's if that's going to be the result.
It's putting a mouth piece in front of an angry mob to just to give the appearance of looking like they actually cared.
The neutral English word that best correlates with the concept you appear to be attempting to communicate is “antithetical.”