Compensation for BG ending earlier [merged]

GalaxianGodGalaxianGod Member Posts: 17
edited November 2022 in General Discussion
When are we getting the promised compensation for the bg ending earlier than before.
Post edited by Kabam Miike on
«13

Comments

  • ChatterofforumsChatterofforums Member Posts: 1,779 ★★★★★
    It's coming when BG season 3 starts, which is Monday.
  • This content has been removed.
  • FurrymoosenFurrymoosen Member Posts: 3,952 ★★★★★


    They were pretty clear on this a week ago. Compensation should be coming today.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,173 ★★★★★

    Let's Goooo
    Umazhing
    No complains ONLY IN MY CASE: I did not miss any of the things people did.
  • PetieCameronPetieCameron Member Posts: 260
    edited November 2022
    On to say exactly the same we lost our end push on that. Are u having a laugh that is terrible [censored]
  • SearmenisSearmenis Member Posts: 1,627 ★★★★★
    Are. You. Kidding. Half an Entry in Elders Marks. HALF!!!

  • GiomeGiome Member Posts: 170 ★★
    Bugmat78 said:

    I'm assuming that was in no way the compensation and was just the usual starter pack they have given out from even when BGs were in beta... right?!

    It must be this.
  • Wozzle007Wozzle007 Member Posts: 1,034 ★★★★★
    This cannot be the compensation. Honestly would have been better to treat this in the same way as the recent phasing/invisibility and not bothered with any compensation if Kabam thinks this is appropriate.
  • This content has been removed.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,573 ★★★★★
    The problem is you can't measure how much someone COULD have won, even more difficult to gauge that in a general way for everyone. Not really commenting on whether it was enough or not. Just pointing out that it wouldn't have been close to the next Milestone.
  • JAsummonarJAsummonar Member Posts: 171
    edited November 2022

    The problem is you can't measure how much someone COULD have won, even more difficult to gauge that in a general way for everyone. Not really commenting on whether it was enough or not. Just pointing out that it wouldn't have been close to the next Milestone.



    They would know where everyone finished. They would have processed that data to decide ranks and rewards. They just had to compensate people according to their rank. It could have simply been the next milestone rewards. For example, if one was silver 2, s/he could have got compensation at least what s/he could have received by being silver 1. To me this sounds like reasonably easy to do. Somewhat fair as well. Surely better than what they did..
This discussion has been closed.