**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Comments
Spare me the lecture about what people should and shouldn't do. It's a garbage design currently.
I’m curious. You have a lot to say about how bad the current by matchmaking is. My question is this. How would you fix it? What’s your plan to make everything “work”
What we have now is just overkill, and it's needless.
Seeding will be introduced next season, now it is data collection time, and seeding won't do anything for lower accounts. Seeding is used to make the load lighter, someone who makes it to GC every season should not start in Bronze. Like I said before, someone's roof is someone else's floor in a ladder system. With seeding some people will move up and some will stay in their bracket beating people that move up.
Everyone plays under the same rules and same ammount of wins needed to move up. There is no overkill, it just separates people able to string wins and people who can't. The rules are the same for everyone.
Everyone under the same rules is moot. No one said otherwise. I'm talking about the current Season and the effect of the changes.
If you're going to keep repeating the same redundant points and comments about my personal progress, I'm going to stop responding.
I think you're going to need to discuss that with them first, but when they elect you as their representative then I'll personally push the button that ejects all of them.
Keep in mind, by "them" I do not mean lower tier players. There's tons of them in Battlegrounds. The only way Paragons can be beating up Cavs and TBs in Diamond is if tons and tons and tons of Cavs and TBs are getting to Diamond. We aren't all beating up on Bob, the unluckiest Cav in the game. I have no problem with any lower tier player who is playing the game, perhaps frustrated with facing monsters in the higher tiers, but then takes it upon themselves to grow their roster and improve their skills and move up on their own effort. Hate me, hate my roster, hate my eight years of experience and practice, and then go get some of that yourself. Put a DNA poster on a dartboard and throw Elektra shurikens at it all day while browsing auntm.ai. Its all cool with me.
We're talking about the (probably) very tiny minority of players who think they get to write the rules of engagement and if the game doesn't serve up hand picked opponents for them they will take their ball and go home. The game mode doesn't need those players and doesn't benefit from them if it has them. Battleground is a competition, and it needs competitors. Not players who need a carefully curated path to the top of the competition.
The same rules issue applied for 1 single reason, you were able to reach GC on seasond 8 and 9, so did a lot of people who are today in GC and were in GC on seasons 8 and 9, why is it that some people are able and you are not to the point of wanting to quit? Seeding is comming, you should play your hardest to try to start as high as possible the next season, yet you want to quit because you are not winning as much.
I don't need to be told what to do with my own experience, and I don't really appreciate my points being diverted over and over to my personal situation. I was clear about that. I'm not responding to you anymore.
Unless you mean in GC. In VT, I have never seen this. In GC matches are computed by ELO, and so the more you win the higher your rating, and thus the higher in rating your opponents will be. The more you win in GC, the stronger your opponents will become, because in GC it is all ratings driven. In VT, the match maker is completely blind to your win/loss record as far as I'm aware.
You said "Those "people" shouldn't be included then told not to play it."
The results are in, and that's a lie. No one has ever told them not to play it. Stop regurgitating that lie.
You said "That wall shouldn't come at the beginning of the competition."
The results are in, and that's also a lie. As the system is current most folks won't hit a definitive wall until somewhere in Platinum.
You said "That competition shouldn't involve placing them in Matches that are 3x their Roster strength, multiplied by the Nodes that increase their strength, and then have the expectation that they need to string nothing but consecutive Wins to advance."
The results are in, and that's what every competition consists of. Someone who isn't great (be it a lack of skill, strength, bad luck, etc) is going to come up against someone much better. The only way to prevent that is to silo the competition based on strength. If that's what you want, fine, advocate for that, but be prepared for the massive reduction in rewards, cause you can't expect the same without doing the same.
You keep claiming the folks at the top are too "entitled" but what you're advocating for is the very definition of entitlement. Expecting to get the same thing as everyone else, without doing the same thing everyone else does to get it.
And lastly, you said "Spare me the lecture about what people should and shouldn't do."
The results are in, and it's apparent that you need to be lectured.
I will, however, use the available tools to maximize my shot at winning those matchups. If my r5 5 star has to take down a r2 7 star in 3 min, believe I will pause the game for 3 min, take my 15k points, and move on with my life.
Should be a cake walk for the big guy to get 15k points.
If/when pausing gets punished, I'll take my Ls until I get the champs beefy enough to compete.
I get to platinum every season, I play fair against the accounts I need to play fair against.
Besides, having reached GC the last few seasons, I know that every player who gets there has the advantage of trouncing weak accounts in the process. Had a player in my alliance brag he faced like 4 accounts in a row that all forfeit because his account was so much stronger. That's not "best of the best".
And demanding that a player get artificially raised higher than they are able to get on their own is asking for free rewards.