**UPDATE - iPAD STUCK FLICKERING SCREEN**
The 47.0.1 hotfix to address the issue of freezing & flashing lights on loading screens when trying to enter a fight, along with other smaller issues, is now ready to be downloaded through the App Store on IOS.
More information here.
The 47.0.1 hotfix to address the issue of freezing & flashing lights on loading screens when trying to enter a fight, along with other smaller issues, is now ready to be downloaded through the App Store on IOS.
More information here.
Comments
What are your sig lvls and 5th champ,
Your SL prestige is so low its 4854, barely more than the high prestige duped 4* 5/50s (so effectively my medusa has higher prestige at 5117, cable has about 300 prestige on your beast aswell)
This is part of my point though, you get penalized because you do not follow the prestige rat race and play the game for fun with champs you actually like?
How is that fair?
Yet 300k total or 400k total and 4/55s + 6* dont make the cut? It is clearly just a sad attempt to promote fgmc and 5* shard deal purchases to hope for prestige pulls. It is too obvious when every new champ has high prestige and they changed the way 5* featureds work.
I am also a long time dedicated player that's been blindsided by this turn of events. I am Uncollected, and have 1 6* and 20 5* champs, I'm not the greatest player but I do alright. Apparently my prestige is around 5000, a detail that I had to rely on the ClanHQ app to calculate. I spend more than I probably should on the game, I'm no whale, but I am a paying customer and therefore I expect to be heard.
You've created a mode of gameplay that encourages players to utilize more of their rosters than their top champs, but then punish a good percentage of those loyal players by saying their top champs aren't good enough. I know a player in our junior alliance who is a champ seller, in the year I've known him, I've only ever known him to have at most 12 champs in his roster, his prestige may be high but his rating is not, he would struggle in this event because of his limited roster. He is not an endgame player in any stretch, but I feel it's worth bringing him up in order to prove a point. Which is it? Should we have big rosters or sacrifice the roster to focus all of our resources on a handful of champs?
I'm not saying "give me a 5* Awakening Gem Crystal..." none of us are... We're saying "Give us the opportunity to earn one for ourselves." Why should we even bother trying if it's clear on Day 1 that there's no chance for us to earn the resources we need to progress. For many of us, that 5* awakening gem is what we're waiting for in order to make the important decision of which champ to rank up.
You can dangle a carrot in front of a mule forever, but you have to feed it eventually or it will die.
There are different arenas for lower level players. That's why those cutoffs are so much lower for the newer players to get the new champs whereas the veteran arena has much higher cutoffs for the champs. You can make a good argument though for the milestones and not the crystal. I think that's a fair point to make.
And just to add to your initial wording, making tough rankup choices is part of the game. "Waiting for the right champ to rank up" is only a valid excuse for a few months. At some point, you just have to make that decision and do it. How long you wanna wait is up to you, but you can't be upset when you're left in the dust when you wait too long
Regarding arena, your right! This is a perfect example of how to do brackets the right way. There are different arenas for different players, but the key difference is ALL arenas are available to a new player, and it is the players goal to work toward betttwr and better arenas. If a new player wants to try his luck in the 4* arena he can, and if he really is good enough and dedicated enough he can do it. Sure his roster isn’t as big so he will need to wait allot more for refresh timers but at least he can try. Meanwhile with this event many people have rosters more then big enough for 7.5k and are locked out
I wish you could use Gif’s in here because I would give you an Applause gif.
No, you are misstating the arena breakdown. New payers have access to what is called "Beginner arenas" which are different from the "veteran arena". Completely different arenas with completely different cutoffs for the champs and milestones. Once you hit a certain profile rating (no clue what that number is), then those beginner brackets disappear and you have access to the "veteran arenas". That is how Kabam separates new players from old players
0-30 days Beginner Bracket
31-60 days intermediate Bracket
61+ days veterans bracket.
It may be calendar months also.
We won't. Apparently having a 5 star awakening gem unbalances the game for everyone, but don't worry they will make it up to us by selling us a 5 star awakening gem for $100.
Except Kabam who's been absolutely quiet about this issue.
While I am aware of this, it wasn’t the example I was focusing on. I was primarily placing the assumption that we are all on the same playing field (as we are in this event). If you want to talk about the actual new player bracketing system I can work with that as well. New players in this case are given the ADVANTAGE with lower cutoffs for the same rewards, and are encouraged to participate. Meanwhile this event says new payers arn’t good enough (even players that have been playing for years) and gimps them on rewards.
100% agree. Kabam really needs to say something and for what it's worth, they should allow the new prestige numbers to increase the milestones if people can reach that prestige during the dungeon month. Otherwise, it's really unfair to lock them out for 30+ days over something like that
I would invite you to read my initial post about my perspective on this because I do not wanna copy and paste my opinion again to clutter the thread
We are talking about milestones And not the rank rewards. We all know beginners and veterans have different rank rewards cutoff. My example lacks detail so its probably my fault.
My context is based on only veteran accounts.
Imagine if a 4k+ prestige player didn't have access to those arena milestones whereas 5k+ prestige players have access.
Imagine how that player feels when he knows he can donate time to hitting those milestone rewards.
Again milestones should have nothing to do with skill/prestige but on how much time is spent grinding. For developed accounts its faster. For under developed accounts its slower. So when you say because you have a higher prestige/you've been playing longer, you deserve the milestone threshold and another person doesn't, its quite disgusting
I guess you wouldn’t want my account getting “too powerful”. The last champ rounding out my top 5 is 4* 5/50 Voodoo sig 99.
I love the dungeons, but this milestone restriction is a joke. I WANT to grind. I’m not asking for compensation or handouts. Just let me grind all milestones!
Yea I already conceded you could make an argument for the milestones. I'm not 100% percent convinced though. But I will say that Kabam should allow current players that are below the prestige threshold to have the opportunity to rankup champs to get over the prestige cutoff. It's unfair to lock them out the whole month. But Kabam is typically not transparent so I wouldn't be surprised if they leave everything as is and just say "sucks to suck" in sum.
Same. Went from 5461 to 5505. Now I’m in expert bracket.