**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Rougeknight87 ★★★
Comments
-
Spend 3 weeks ramming your head into the back fence then have a sibling or loved one kick you in the groin for a prolonged period. This should at least part way motivate you knowing that there are at least 2 worse ways that you could spend your time
-
You’re possibly the most deluded individual I’ve ever had the pleasure to converse with. There is no possible way you actually believe what you’re saying. If you’re an alliance in a competitive system with other alliances there should be no complaints if you’re facing another alliance in that same division. If the other…
-
How can anyone argue that’s it’s unfair for an alliance to face another because it’s an uneven matchup yet in the same breath argue the case for them receiving the exact same rewards as the alliance that they were not In the same league as in the first place? 😂 Unreal
-
It is what your saying. I said that in my previous post. 3 points is 3 points whether you win them in division1 or division 3. The multipliers that lower alliance is receiving is a direct result of playing only alliances of the same prestige and level. At the end of the day it’s a competition. If an alliance wants plat 3…
-
Take English soccer or any national soccer competition with relegation and promotion in place. If the top team in tier 3 won 26 out of 30 matches for a season and the top team in tier one only won 25/30 does that mean the tier team 3 should be crowned champions of the country? All the matches are worth the same points,…
-
Yeah the second put up more points by playing in a completely different bracket lol. If the rank 2 alliance is really the rank 2 alliance they should have no complaints in facing the rank 3 alliance for season rewards. What you want is different sets of rules for different alliances yet have everyone compete in the same…
-
The system was broken, having a lower rating meant you were getting much easier matchups which resulted in a skewed leaderboard that heavily favoured a handful of alliances. It needed correcting and this is the result, it won’t be back to normal again until every alliance finds their level.
-
What the point of having 5 and 6 star champs if you can’t use them in competitive gameplay? Have a listen to yourself. You’re upset because you’re now having to face alliances in the exact same tier who are getting the exact same prizes. If you can beat them you can get the same stuff. Pretty bloody simple pal. I also…
-
what on earth is unfair about this matchup? They’ve both won similar amounts of wars and are in the same tier with the same (basically) war rating? Why should a lower rated alliance only face other lower rating alliances and be rewarded with the same season ending prizes as alliances they haven’t had to face as the system…
-
I said you’re assuming I’m here complaining to get more rewards, like you usually do. Meaning you think I’m complaining as that’s usually your first port of call to anyone. I don’t need to look at your comment history. I don’t care where your alliance is and it should t really matter, 4 wars in, big mistake, cancel it and…
-
Have a re-read, don’t even care if you still disagree but don’t put words in mouth. My issue isn’t more rewards or compensation or tiers or whatever you’re trying to steer this towards. My issue is the way it’s been handled and the continued impact on players when it didn’t have to be the case. You do you though.
-
It’s not the same effect’s at all, not doing this all over again. It doesn’t help ME what so ever. I’m Gold 1 regardless. You’re assuming I’m on here complaint to get more like you usually do. Not even bothering to read my comment. My issue is they handled it badly by not stopping it, paying out then bringing forward the…
-
My suggestion all along was to end the season after the initial issue. Nowhere have I suggested to end it now, nor would I. Nice rant though 🙄 glad to see you’ve read my comments
-
If that’s all you’re seeing then there’s no point continuing the conversation. Nowhere have I indicated you’d have to settle, getting a reward 2 weeks earlier, then starting a new season actually let’s you earn more rewards in a quicker space of time, for less items. But don’t let that get in the way of disagreeing with me…
-
🙄😵
-
The issue is the human issue, nowhere have I been talking about the technical issue not being fixed. You’re twisting words. We’re still dealing with the fallout from the original issue therefor the issue is still ongoing with potential of alliances not being able to move on players or having players kicked and not…
-
The current situation makes me think that’s what should have been done. Thought that much is about obvious. The issue isn’t resolved, it’s still ongoing. It also has the potential to create even more issues and impact a lot more people then original issue did in the first place.
-
Why are you working under the premise that people would have only received a fraction of rewards? The season was compromised, payout, cop it. Move on. Save’s everyone the pain and brings about the new one for those who are upset they didn’t have the chance to climb the leaderboard or tiers as others are suggesting. You…
-
Snarky. Admitting the season was compromised and stopping it while paying out rewards isn’t really negatively impacting all that many is it? I’ve tried to address that though yet you seem intent on selectively quoting me.
-
How can people be unhappy and not inconvenienced? Also not everyone is in the same position as you. We're fighting for plat 4 and we know if we win these wars, we'll reach plat 4. Ending the season early means alliances that pushed hard and used items to get to where they are now is wasted if they are prevented from…
-
Says who? Don’t even have to call it a season. All they had to do was cop their mistake on the chin, payout rewards and bring forward the next season. The fault is theirs not the player bases yet the player base has been continually negatively impacted by the way it’s been handled. When you mess up you should minimise the…
-
What player is unhappy with receiving rewards 2 weeks earlier then expected and then getting the chance to climb those tiers again if you bring a season forward? The reason I say terrible leadership isn’t because I think I’m right, it’s because by letting this play out instead of putting a stop to it the people at fault…
-
The war was being corrected so no-one loses out to that. Shortening the season or admitting that it’s compromised Is admitting fault. Payout people where they finished and bring forward the next season. Players might be unhappy but no-one is inconvenienced like they are with this scenario. You’re also going to have players…
-
I use my 5* to prop my books up so they don’t all fall over
-
Beggars can’t be choosers mate, be happy with either haha. Can add rhulk and wasp to that list for synergy purposes!
-
Aegon and Nick Fury, desperate for both.
-
Completely missing the point.
-
Show some leadership and shut the thing down. Fact is that alliances have either gained an advantage or have been put at a disadvantage as a direct result of technical anomaly. It’s now at a point where matchups and future matchups are directly influenced from that anomaly and the butterfly effect of that means the season…
-
Sym supreme is an awesome champ mate, does everything you want your mystic champ to do. MS by no means a slouch but picking between the 2 is take sym up. Doesn’t need to be awakened and fairly straightforward game style, really handy for endgame content also
-
Radio silence. I know they’ve said they will fix it but it’s highly unlikely. This happened a few seasons back and instead of addressing it they intstead chose to go dark on it until people forgot. Not great leadership.
