Best Of

That is a very good point. Thanks for the reminder

The possible reason given info provided by OP is someone turned on a home phone/pc version while he was traveling and started game at same time he was logged on somewhere else or within a time period where travel was impossible. Ie America to Europe in 30 minutes. Not sure this helps but a possibility

You should threaten them that you will stop spending, that worked so well in the past…

I'm taking Scorpion if it's in there.

Not for free unless you managed to get very unlucky on the crystals or go through the super box

My initial plan was to have at least 100 revives for one challenge (60 for paths and 40 for Ares) so my question is how much is too much? Rn I have 150 combined revives and 22 team revives. I recently ran some epoch paths for the first time with an average of 40 revives. 10 on paths and 30 for Ares. I should also mention that first fight of every lane was solo. I just restart it if it wasn't a solo but we won't have this here.

Probably. Need to do some practical testing

It always comes back to reading

If people have a problem with a particular poster, the correct step to take is to report them and let the moderators decide what actions, if any, to take. Directly calling out posters is discouraged, and personal attacks themselves are forbidden.

Being annoying is not, in and of itself, grounds for getting someone removed. I've been called everything in the book. I've been called annoying, a mindless troll, a worthless sycophant, a rage baiter, you name it. I'm sure to a segment of the forum population I'm all those things. But I'm still here, because those subjective opinions ultimately do not determine if someone stays or goes.

The poster in question has often weird opinions and an abrasive delivery of them. But if they are subjectively objectionable, the correct thing to do is to ignore them. A post that is ignored quickly vanishes from the front page, and soon afterwards from everyone's attention horizon. If they are actually rule-breaking, the correct thing to do is to notify a moderator. But they have to actually be rules-breaking. Every report that is obviously just an attempt to get rid of someone you don't like that the moderators investigate and determine to be not an actual rules violation only reinforces the notion that the problem reports themselves are the problem.

Having a bad take is not a crime. How we as a forum community deal with bad takes says more about us than those bad takes do about the original poster of them. This is only an analogy and not meant to be a specific characterization, but whether we laugh with the village idiot or throw stones at them is a statement about us, not about what they are saying.