Kabam fails again when it comes to open and honest communication with the community.
You know what they need to do when things like this happen, that give players an advantage just for being top tier?
They need to tell us. They can't tell us "We found this bug AND IT'S ALREADY FIXED YOU CAN'T EXPLOIT IT ANYMORE but we're letting people who did walk away smiling." What they need to say, in fact, is "we found a bug and will push a fix in 48 hours to resolve it. if you found it, good for you, and if you want to grind for it, you're welcome to. this is your chance to pump the gas and get it done before it's fixed and we put you back on the short bus."
They need to give everyone a chance to make it right on the player's terms, rather than, yet again, deciding something will or will not be undone based on exploits. How many times have users exploited something and have those rewards stripped, or been banned? But this time, Kabam makes a mature decision, decides "this is on us, let's not punish them" but still comes across as a middle finger.
It's not right. Kabam has f-dash-dash-dash--you-see-kay'd up left and right this year and they're being garbage about compensation (which i dont want in this case but in general), openness, and fairness to the community.
That's not what happened. The bug was brought to their attention and immediately they disabled them. The fix was pushed not long after. They didn't discover it and let people run amok.
Probably brought to their attention after all the alliances buddies completed 100% and finished exploiting then report to ensure no one else can exploit after. I don't see how this exempt kabam to do the right thing.
Ps. Unless you work for kabam you are only speculating as well you don't know what happened.
I was here when it was reported, acknowledged, and resolved. I don't need to work for them to be observant.
The right thing is up to their judgment, and in this case, they allowed people to keep the Rank Ups. Probably because it was on their end, and people weren't responsible for that. A handful of people Ranking newer Champs isn't going to throw the balance off. Everyone doing it will. Which is why they're limited to begin with.
It's unfortunate it happened, but it wasn't planned. They made a decision.
WTF!!!!!
a handful wont throw off balance but everyone will??? what are you smoking dude!!!!
balance is even...
unbalanced in well, uneven....
a handful of people ranking better champs throws off balance as they have an advantage other dont
if everyone did it then it would be perfectly balanced as it is a level playing field.
simple..
if everyone has the same thing these scales stay balanced no matter how good or bad that thing is.
the moment that some get something better the scales tip to one side creating imbalance.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, my quote which you misapplied was about why there shouldn't but punishment with loss of rewards, bans, etc., as people were suggesting. They shouldn't reverse the rank up and then not give the correct gem.
No, it isn't. Not getting something you weren't supposed to get, and getting instead what was advertised isn't punishment. Keep trolling.
That’s opinion. They used what they recieved and made decisions based on what they had. Keep up with the ad hom? This is my third post, trolling would be posting multiple times all weekend long like others, some who have up to 40 posts in this thread.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, my quote which you misapplied was about why there shouldn't but punishment with loss of rewards, bans, etc., as people were suggesting. They shouldn't reverse the rank up and then not give the correct gem.
Reversing a rank up is not a loss of reward?
@MrMaat It wasnt a generic gem, class specific. People have been factually incorrect on this including one you tuber who put a generic in the thumbnail.
No, it isn't. Not getting something you weren't supposed to get, and getting instead what was advertised isn't punishment. Keep trolling.
That’s opinion. They used what they recieved and made decisions based on what they had. Keep up with the ad hom? This is my third post, trolling would be posting multiple times all weekend long like others, some who have up to 40 posts in this thread.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, my quote which you misapplied was about why there shouldn't but punishment with loss of rewards, bans, etc., as people were suggesting. They shouldn't reverse the rank up and then not give the correct gem.
Reversing a rank up is not a loss of reward?
@MrMaat It wasnt a generic gem, class specific. People have been factually incorrect on this including one you tuber who put a generic in the thumbnail.
No, it isn't. Not getting something you weren't supposed to get, and getting instead what was advertised isn't punishment. Keep trolling.
That’s opinion. They used what they recieved and made decisions based on what they had. Keep up with the ad hom? This is my third post, trolling would be posting multiple times all weekend long like others, some who have up to 40 posts in this thread.
You can troll with one post but whatever.
You can also be in such a weak position with an argument you start grasping at straws and result to personal attacks, nothing new from you.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, my quote which you misapplied was about why there shouldn't but punishment with loss of rewards, bans, etc., as people were suggesting. They shouldn't reverse the rank up and then not give the correct gem.
Reversing a rank up is not a loss of reward?
@MrMaat It wasnt a generic gem, class specific. People have been factually incorrect on this including one you tuber who put a generic in the thumbnail.
generic as in not restricted to 2015.....
i tried to edit my post as to not cause any issues.
however it is waiting to be approveed.
and currently removed.
here is my edited image.
@CoatHang3r I think it’s pretty obvious he meant generic as in the ability to be used on anyone. Not specific. And to reiterate what others have said, taking something away they weren’t ever supposed to have, and replacing it with what they were supposed to have is not punishment. Not giving them a replacement gem would be punishment.
The undeniable fact is that in similar situations in the past, Kabam has actively punished people for such actions. For them to not just skip the punishment (which most don’t want anyway), but also skip the appropriate correction, goes strongly against the precedent they set.
Accurate? Mostly, i would’ve gone with “class specific rank up gem”. I just think it’s important to not misrepresent what’s happened. Thanks for correcting that. @MrMaat
@BirdReynolds It wasn’t obvious to me, and clearly there are others who actually thought (and likely still do) they were generic gems.
It would also be an undeniable fact that in the past Kabam has let people keep items that they recieved in error. Sentry comes to mind and there are others. So no there is not precedent, every instance of error is generally unique and must be weighed with both impact and culpability in mind.
@CoatHang3r I find that hard to believe. What I find even harder to believe is that so many players on the top of the food chain who can complete some of the hardest content we’ve seen, would be clueless as to the exact nature of the rewards.
There’s a few examples in this thread and through YouTube of those players receiving the gem, realizing it could be misused, and decided not to because they were aware of the precedent Kabam set with punishing exploits. So yes, there is precedent. Receiving items in error is different than knowingly exploiting a loophole. You’re the one grasping at straws here.
@BirdReynolds So your argument is that you cannot accept people didn’t read an item desrciption? Sorry there is a mountain of evidence on these very forums where peope act, make decisions and forum posts before reading about what an item specifically does. Now i don’t dispute there are people who knew better and acted, they also acted on the item they recieved;is it unreasonable for them to assume the decription of the gem itself was the actual bug? However there are people who did not know then spent other items and made other decisions based on what they were able to do with the rewards recieved from the game.
Precedent where? You keep saying this but it is not sellf evident.
Lol, guy. I shouldn’t have to hold your hand through this. The most recent is the units bug in beta. Nowhere did it explicitly state that you can’t do what they did. But they did it, and got punished severely (justifiably so). Here, it was explicitly stated that the gems were for 2015 champs only. And if you can’t make a reasonable assumption that end game players know what they’re spending large amounts of resources and possibly money to get, then you’re being willfully ignorant. That’s not a good space to argue from.
Your argument that “it was brought to their attention and they fixed it quickly so no harm was done” is completely INVALID as a stance towards fairness
Killmonger Indestructible bug; Beneficial: Fixed in about a week.
Magik gaining Sp2 power from 0% opponents; beneficial: fixed in like a day or two
Medusa Living strands removing only a few fury and debuffs; beneficial: defensively she earned them item use/sales and took about a month
Archangel Neurotoxin stuns; beneficial: officially told as working as intended they reneged that stance and “fixed” the interaction
Drax: took 2 years and virtually ended up with people having wasted resources LONG after it was revealed to be a but but decided to keep it and later suddenly patched it
IMIW, defensively profitable: left for a month, allegedly fixed and then fixed again after the first one didn’t work.
Their track record sucks especially thanks to the DRAX one being heinous as they over fixed him out of paranoia. Yet they still allow AA and X23 to do what he does except with better heavy attacks.
The only time they’ve ever allowed long term beneficial “bugs” to last that long is in the odd case between Archangel and Drax. One of which is borderline wariyed resources afterwards and Archangel was made so OP anyways that they STILL haven’t “fixed” everything as his heavy still bypasses Mordo because unlike with Drax who relied on the niche of bypassing evades, Archangel is intrinsically OP by conception
Hi all, thanks for your passionate back and forth on this issue.
We thought it would be helpful to let you know that only a very small percentage of those players who could access the content ranked up non 2015 characters. Approximately ~0.008%.
While we appreciate the suggestions to roll those accounts back, it’s not something we will be moving forward with.
Rolling back ranked up Champions sounds straightforward, however, the reality is that Champion progression is incredibly complex. It very quickly becomes almost impossible to cleanly reverse and has the potential to cause even more challenges.
We know how important the competitive balance of The Contest is to all Summoners, ourselves included. Which is why the competitive modes rely more on breadth of roster and Alliance participation than any single Champion.
These decisions are difficult for us to make, especially when it may result in disappointment. We carefully consider the scale of the impact, the feedback we have received, and use all the technical resources at our disposal.
Again thank you very much for your passion and dedication to The Contest, we have many more great things in store in the coming months. Keep an eye out for our upcoming anniversary celebration!
Comments
WTF!!!!!
a handful wont throw off balance but everyone will??? what are you smoking dude!!!!
balance is even...
unbalanced in well, uneven....
a handful of people ranking better champs throws off balance as they have an advantage other dont
if everyone did it then it would be perfectly balanced as it is a level playing field.
simple..
if everyone has the same thing these scales stay balanced no matter how good or bad that thing is.
the moment that some get something better the scales tip to one side creating imbalance.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, my quote which you misapplied was about why there shouldn't but punishment with loss of rewards, bans, etc., as people were suggesting. They shouldn't reverse the rank up and then not give the correct gem.
@MrMaat It wasnt a generic gem, class specific. People have been factually incorrect on this including one you tuber who put a generic in the thumbnail.
You can troll with one post but whatever.
generic as in not restricted to 2015.....
Now, with most of the 2015 champs it might FEEL like a punishment... But that's a discussion for another day.
i tried to edit my post as to not cause any issues.
however it is waiting to be approveed.
and currently removed.
here is my edited image.
better @CoatHang3r ??
Such a shame there is no integrity to be found with this company.
The undeniable fact is that in similar situations in the past, Kabam has actively punished people for such actions. For them to not just skip the punishment (which most don’t want anyway), but also skip the appropriate correction, goes strongly against the precedent they set.
It would also be an undeniable fact that in the past Kabam has let people keep items that they recieved in error. Sentry comes to mind and there are others. So no there is not precedent, every instance of error is generally unique and must be weighed with both impact and culpability in mind.
Only 2 people on my block list reminding me why they’re there.
There’s a few examples in this thread and through YouTube of those players receiving the gem, realizing it could be misused, and decided not to because they were aware of the precedent Kabam set with punishing exploits. So yes, there is precedent. Receiving items in error is different than knowingly exploiting a loophole. You’re the one grasping at straws here.
Precedent where? You keep saying this but it is not sellf evident.
I’d be angry too
@BirdReynolds Laughably bad analogy, those who grasp at straws while living in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Your argument that “it was brought to their attention and they fixed it quickly so no harm was done” is completely INVALID as a stance towards fairness
Killmonger Indestructible bug; Beneficial: Fixed in about a week.
Magik gaining Sp2 power from 0% opponents; beneficial: fixed in like a day or two
Medusa Living strands removing only a few fury and debuffs; beneficial: defensively she earned them item use/sales and took about a month
Archangel Neurotoxin stuns; beneficial: officially told as working as intended they reneged that stance and “fixed” the interaction
Drax: took 2 years and virtually ended up with people having wasted resources LONG after it was revealed to be a but but decided to keep it and later suddenly patched it
IMIW, defensively profitable: left for a month, allegedly fixed and then fixed again after the first one didn’t work.
Their track record sucks especially thanks to the DRAX one being heinous as they over fixed him out of paranoia. Yet they still allow AA and X23 to do what he does except with better heavy attacks.
The only time they’ve ever allowed long term beneficial “bugs” to last that long is in the odd case between Archangel and Drax. One of which is borderline wariyed resources afterwards and Archangel was made so OP anyways that they STILL haven’t “fixed” everything as his heavy still bypasses Mordo because unlike with Drax who relied on the niche of bypassing evades, Archangel is intrinsically OP by conception
We thought it would be helpful to let you know that only a very small percentage of those players who could access the content ranked up non 2015 characters. Approximately ~0.008%.
While we appreciate the suggestions to roll those accounts back, it’s not something we will be moving forward with.
Rolling back ranked up Champions sounds straightforward, however, the reality is that Champion progression is incredibly complex. It very quickly becomes almost impossible to cleanly reverse and has the potential to cause even more challenges.
We know how important the competitive balance of The Contest is to all Summoners, ourselves included. Which is why the competitive modes rely more on breadth of roster and Alliance participation than any single Champion.
These decisions are difficult for us to make, especially when it may result in disappointment. We carefully consider the scale of the impact, the feedback we have received, and use all the technical resources at our disposal.
Again thank you very much for your passion and dedication to The Contest, we have many more great things in store in the coming months. Keep an eye out for our upcoming anniversary celebration!