**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
I counted 9. You have your featureds: Doom, Longshot, Squirrel, Nova, Surfer, and Fantastic.
Then you have your other good champs: Havok, Emma, and Doc Oc.
So 9/24 is 37.5%, which is a pretty good ratio.
Now if you were going for just the featureds, it/s 6/24, which is 25% which is still a good ratio. That's at least 1 out of every 4 crystals is a featured champ/ good champ.
I’d love to see beta players live-streaming it with Kabam employees on the call. Like the incursions, then when someone like Seatin cries foul play they can say ‘we designed this aspect to make you consider X/Y or Z’ and then the player has an epiphany. Or, the employee on the call starts to Vigorously write - needs refining.
Would also make Kabam feel less of a faceless organisation as well, which I dare say some of this backlash is a result of - not an outpouring of support for Seatin himself but just pent up frustration that he’s been the catalyst for releasing.
Give Cyclops and OG Storm and OG Captain America and OG Iron Man a Leadership passive exactly like CapIW, and boom, done
Make a Magneto buff Priority No. 1. Then a StarkTech characters buff Priority No. 2.
All stop. Implement in 30 days. Period. Full stop
They just don’t understand how much people want this kind of stuff to happen QUICKLY
If this would happen, MCOC would still go on, but how would this affect their "earned Media"? Let's not forget that MCOC will not be put on life saving respiratory device if Seating's decides to jump ship and go jump on the bandwagon named "fortnite"....
With Seating's gone, this would open the position of no1 MCOC influencer on YouTube, and others will want a bigger piece of the pie, competition is always good, because it brings the best out of people.
Point is, you need betas for reworks, and those take time. If you don't want a beta, then just say goodbye to reworks because how does the community know if the rework was effective without a beta? They don't.
What you don't understand is that if there is no beta, Kabam could just drop another Joe Fixit on you in the rework because the players aren't testing it.
And buffs ARE valued. That's why they're still doing reworks.
Also, they can't just whip a rework out of nowhere, and "as quickly as [you] said" because they take time, just like anything, they take time. In your "real-world corporate management experience", how long does a project take to 1) be thought up as an idea 2) to be fully realized 3) to have components start to work 4) to begin assembling 5) to present a prototype 6) to troubleshoot 7) to advertise or test run 8) to troubleshoot again 9) to determine presentation 10) to roll out the final product?
And you can't just buff the stats by 20% because that messes up the in-game dynamic.
And they're not wasting your time. You still play while they're doing betas aren't you? They don't just stop all progress in the game. And the "tiny" impacts your talking about actually changed a lot when talking about in-game mechanics.
You could at least try to appreciate what Kabam has done in terms of Incursions and character re-works.
Now I agree that Kabam have added some sub-par champions to the 6* pool, but adding champs, like everything else, takes TIME. We just need to be patient.
I take it that you don't realize how long it takes to code and run everything.