This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
All i can say is that is has been zero fun! But somehow (beyond me) we are exactly where we started. Right at around 500. The last three we faced (in order), an empty map, a map full of ranked, awakend 5s and 6s against our 3s and unawakened 4s, and then another empty map. So basically we have had nothing to do! My players got dropped immediately in the second war and i told them to just stay down cause with their rosters it was pointless to get up! The other two wars we just walked the map, and with each one i lose a player. I am down to five who actually place... NO FUN!!!
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
It is the same as smaller alliance skirting stronger ones.
LOL right! Not a leadership problem it is a suck matchmaking system giving us waste of time wars. And there is the point! It was never "prestige" that caused this mess! It was matches like i discribed! EMPTY. and here is news for you! It is still gonna happen and undeserving alliances will still climb up to the top and still end up with rewards they really didn't have to play to get. This mess isn't gonna change that. Not everybody is so competitive they wanna win and are willing to win by doing nothing! To some that isn't fun! That my friend is a sportmanship issue! And guys like you? Ya got none! Only ego. And they did walk the map and we will be 30 points higher than we started...i expect the next war some of them will be taken away...but it is boring and aggravating and we are going up, and down, and up, with out every really getting to play!
There is no way a 13m ally should be anywhere near gold1 😂 the bigger allies are not happy because they are getting matched with allies half their strength, they are happy because they are getting the chance to be in a standing they deserve.
We have been stuck in P4 for the last few seasons and now we are on the verge of P2 and in T2. With a 36m rated ally and 10.6k prestige.
We have faced bigger allies (with higher prestige) in the last 3 wars And won (this one is slightly in our favour but only by 200 prestige and similar rating)
The new system is allowing people to get to the level that their skill and roster deserves rather than being pushed down because smaller allies have been fighting against other small allies and they are being elevated to P3 and above.
If your still using 4*’s and r3 5*’s then you should be in silver or below, not gold1 or close
We've been running 2 BGs for this season, so we are already going to recieve lower rewards.
Our first war was a loss. It was a fair matchup but we just got outplayed.
Our 2nd and 3rd wars were landslide victories.
Our 4th war was a loss that should've been a win. It was a t9 war and we all knew we were able to win the war.
Our 1st BG (my BG) cleared and explored the map with 6 hrs remaining and minimal deaths. Our 2nd BG dropped the ball completely. They ended up having to take the final boss LINKED just to secure the BG clear.
We had 2 guys go MIA with an hr left and the war on the line. They lost the war for us. One of them had 3 champs at close to full health. The other one said they could take an additional fight and disappeared afterwards with no explanation.
We lost by 500 points (+ the Season bonus). We would've won if either of the 2 guys previously mentioned downed one more opponent. After calculating the points we could've earned, I realized that we could've landed in G2 if we won the war. We are now in Silver 1. I'll never forget feeling my heart sink when I saw that we lost.
Our opponents were really good sports though and they played very well.
We are winning our current war by a large margin. Hopefully we can get back to t9 and have another shot at pulling in some big points. Hopefully no-one drops the ball this time.
All the guys saying its fair are happy because they are getting wars against the allys of half of thier ratings. And they cant beat the alliance of thier same size so they dont want it to change. And whats problem with 13 mil ally being in a gold bracket ? It is because we defeated the opponents of our same or sometimes more sizes all the season whereas you cant do that and you want matchup against lower alliances. Grow up guys If a heavywieght beats up lightweight you cant call it fair.
1) That's not true. Our first war was against a 23m Gold 2 Ally. We are a 16m Gold 3 Ally. Did I complain? No.
2) 13m in Gold 1 means you fought some super easy matchups to get there. The guys you are facing now are your actual competition.
Facing a same rating ally or plus minus 5 mil ally does not mean an easy matchup my friend. War is all about skills and strategy. Kabam previously gave matchup with same rating ally don't u think it was fair matchup. Wht will u say when a 35-40mil ally being in bronze or silver tier facing an 5-6 mil ally. Would that be a fair matchup in your openion
And so far? It has not measured or really made it possible to ascertain my players skill or lack there of at all! You kinda have to get to fight! Or at least face a reasonable level opponent to do that and so far we are just riding along with our war rating going down then up then down...again no one in my alliance considers that to be fun!
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
It is the same as smaller alliance skirting stronger ones.
Makes perfect sense, we are fighting an alliance that placed p3 last season, they are 9k prestige and 24mil rated, we are 10.2k prestige, 35mil and placed p4 last season. They are struggling to even get out of section 2, there’s simply no way they should be getting better rewards than us.
sorry we are not facing our actual competitor's. This is our second war cycle ever...before this when we actually got an opponent it was a reasonable match. But we were still facing many where the maps were just empty. Now we are getting unreasonable matches and empty maps. So instead of getting to actually work for victory it was handed to us over and over. I really do not see that changing because of this! And there will still be alliances that recieve rewards they really did little to warrant. And the only way you can be sure they don't is if your allaince gets matched with them so you can prove how great and skillful you are and kick em back down... So maybe the better choice than all this noise would have been a season play off... Then you could show em! Prove how totally awesome you are!
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
But you won't admit a 5 year old should never leapfrog the armed 35 year old in the leaderboards.
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
But you won't admit a 5 year old should never leapfrog the armed 35 year old in the leaderboards.
Or that 35 years old guy should go and compete with the same age fellas and stop roaming around with the kids.
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
But you won't admit a 5 year old should never leapfrog the armed 35 year old in the leaderboards.
Or that 35 years old guy should go and compete with the same age fellas and stop roaming around with the kids.
I agree, but how can the 5y/o pass the 35 y/o in the leaderboards. Is that fair?
your 13 mil alliance doesn't deserve gold 1 rewards. If you can't beat the big bad 30 mil alliance, then git gud, advance your roster, and come back in a couple years when you can actually beat gold alliances.
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
Not exactly, but if we get 50/50 we won’t climb up, meanwhile there are alliances we completely obliterate in a 1v1 climbing and facing other extremely weak alliances ranking above us, and I don’t find the fact they’re climbing higher than us by only facing weak alliances fair when we are only facing other crazy strong ones
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
Terrible analogy, it’s more like a football league table. If you want to be in the big boys leagues you should play against the big boys.
Go on a run and do a Leicester City and you’ll finish in the top spot due to your skill, squad depth and leadership. If you don’t have those then you shouldn’t be in the premiership you should be in League 2 fighting for the same rewards as Swindon town.
You can’t expect to be beating Stevenage every week and get the same rewards as Liverpool!
To those people, same war rating so it is fair you want to say this right? So you want to say a 5 year old kid and a trained 35 years old lieutenant with a m416 assault rifle are the same?
Terrible analogy, it’s more like a football league table. If you want to be in the big boys leagues you should play against the big boys.
Go on a run and do a Leicester City and you’ll finish in the top spot due to your skill, squad depth and leadership. If you don’t have those then you shouldn’t be in the premiership you should be in League 2 fighting for the same rewards as Swindon town.
You can’t expect to be beating Stevenage every week and get the same rewards as Liverpool!
I don't understand all the references but from what i do understand i completely agree with the perfect analogy
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, it’s a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
Not exactly, but if we get 50/50 we won’t climb up, meanwhile there are alliances we completely obliterate in a 1v1 climbing and facing other extremely weak alliances ranking above us, and I don’t find the fact they’re climbing higher than us by only facing weak alliances fair when we are only facing other crazy strong ones
The fact is they are skilled enough to defeate opponent ally of same rating while u are not. Thats why they are placed in ranking above you. Dont get jelous. The fact is you guys have increased your prestige ang rating but not your skills. Admit it man
Comments
The other two wars we just walked the map, and with each one i lose a player. I am down to five who actually place...
NO FUN!!!
Not everybody is so competitive they wanna win and are willing to win by doing nothing! To some that isn't fun! That my friend is a sportmanship issue!
And guys like you? Ya got none! Only ego.
And they did walk the map and we will be 30 points higher than we started...i expect the next war some of them will be taken away...but it is boring and aggravating and we are going up, and down, and up, with out every really getting to play!
We have been stuck in P4 for the last few seasons and now we are on the verge of P2 and in T2. With a 36m rated ally and 10.6k prestige.
We have faced bigger allies (with higher prestige) in the last 3 wars And won (this one is slightly in our favour but only by 200 prestige and similar rating)
The new system is allowing people to get to the level that their skill and roster deserves rather than being pushed down because smaller allies have been fighting against other small allies and they are being elevated to P3 and above.
If your still using 4*’s and r3 5*’s then you should be in silver or below, not gold1 or close
War is all about skills and strategy.
Kabam previously gave matchup with same rating ally don't u think it was fair matchup.
Wht will u say when a 35-40mil ally being in bronze or silver tier facing an 5-6 mil ally. Would that be a fair matchup in your openion
@Kabam Zibiit
@Kabam Vydious
@Kabam Porthos
@Kabam Lyra
Please comment on this issue. We are eagerly waiting for your responce.
So maybe the better choice than all this noise would have been a season play off...
Then you could show em! Prove how totally awesome you are!
Go on a run and do a Leicester City and you’ll finish in the top spot due to your skill, squad depth and leadership. If you don’t have those then you shouldn’t be in the premiership you should be in League 2 fighting for the same rewards as Swindon town.
You can’t expect to be beating Stevenage every week and get the same rewards as Liverpool!