This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, itβs a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
Not exactly, but if we get 50/50 we wonβt climb up, meanwhile there are alliances we completely obliterate in a 1v1 climbing and facing other extremely weak alliances ranking above us, and I donβt find the fact theyβre climbing higher than us by only facing weak alliances fair when we are only facing other crazy strong ones
The fact is they are skilled enough to defeate opponent ally of same rating while u are not. Thats why they are placed in ranking above you. Dont get jelous. The fact is you guys have increased your prestige ang rating but not your skills. Admit it man
War shouldn't be about facing alliances of you same rating. It should be about facing allys of your same tier. If you want the rewards, earn them, if your so skilled. Also, let's see some of these 'skills' you speak of.
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, itβs a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
Not exactly, but if we get 50/50 we wonβt climb up, meanwhile there are alliances we completely obliterate in a 1v1 climbing and facing other extremely weak alliances ranking above us, and I donβt find the fact theyβre climbing higher than us by only facing weak alliances fair when we are only facing other crazy strong ones
The fact is they are skilled enough to defeate opponent ally of same rating while u are not. Thats why they are placed in ranking above you. Dont get jelous. The fact is you guys have increased your prestige ang rating but not your skills. Admit it man
War shouldn't be about facing alliances of you same rating. It should be about facing allys of your same tier. If you want the rewards, earn them, if your so skilled. Also, let's see some of these 'skills' you speak of.
This New Matchmaking System is a Treat for Bigger Alliance who suck at this game as they can just climb ranks by defeating weaker opponents. Thats why most of the peoples are saying that its fair.
No, itβs a treat for big alliances that were held back by never facing alliances that were weaker than them, while the weak alliances only faced other weak alliances and could climb higher despite getting obliterated in a 1v1 match
Dont get offended but do you mean you were held back because you were facing alliance as strong as yours and you need to fight lower alliances to climb up.
Not exactly, but if we get 50/50 we wonβt climb up, meanwhile there are alliances we completely obliterate in a 1v1 climbing and facing other extremely weak alliances ranking above us, and I donβt find the fact theyβre climbing higher than us by only facing weak alliances fair when we are only facing other crazy strong ones
The fact is they are skilled enough to defeate opponent ally of same rating while u are not. Thats why they are placed in ranking above you. Dont get jelous. The fact is you guys have increased your prestige ang rating but not your skills. Admit it man
War shouldn't be about facing alliances of you same rating. It should be about facing allys of your same tier. If you want the rewards, earn them, if your so skilled. Also, let's see some of these 'skills' you speak of.
LoL i don't think so. Facing an opponent of double ally rating makes no sence even if they are in same bracket. This simply makes the war easy for higher rating ally. If higher rating allies want to grow by doing this then I would like to say them 'Grow up". If u can not defeate an ally rating same as you then how can u say u deserve an higher tier reward? U are telling lower rating ally should be able to defeate opponents of almost double triple rating ally to recieve good rewards while higher rating ally can not even defeate same rating opponent.
Lol. Youβre delusional.
@xNig I don't think you're going to convince anyone. I still see people with 4* in profile asking for g2 alliances and people with one r5 asking for p3 in global
Whether they get it or not, is a different story. I can have a 2* account asking for Masters alliances too.
We are a 13 million alliance and our Last three war matches are 24, 22 and 16. And today's war match is 34 million π. We were so close to gold 1 and now we are so close to silver 3! Tell us about your AW season. War rating 920.
Really your 13mil alliance competing for gold1, while in the the meantime alliances like mine at 26mil competing for silver1, exposes with the most strong way, how much broken and corrupted, was the previous prestige matchmaking π€ Compensation for 10+ seasons of this circus should be the real conversation π
It is so interesting how things work with you guys! You don't get what you want you complain. If it is the fault of kabam you want compensation. When you get 6 star shards and open them likely as not you will come in and complain about the rng. IF by some chance it is someone you wanted you come in and complain there isn't enough gold or iso. Let anyone else make the same sorts of claims about their experiences (as long as you are happy with it) you bully and brutalize them in the forums. You do not care how you win only that you do win, however you seem very concerned about how others win!
It is so interesting how things work with you guys! You don't get what you want you complain. If it is the fault of kabam you want compensation. When you get 6 star shards and open them likely as not you will come in and complain about the rng. IF by some chance it is someone you wanted you come in and complain there isn't enough gold or iso. Let anyone else make the same sorts of claims about their experiences (as long as you are happy with it) you bully and brutalize them in the forums. You do not care how you win only that you do win, however you seem very concerned about how others win!
Wait. Youβre not getting the matches you want and youβre complaining right?
I selected no comment because I've already expressed myself, and the question is somewhat open for me. It makes sense in that I get the logic behind it. That doesn't mean the execution of changing it on a dime makes sense to me, and the idea that any Match is fair if the War Rating is the same, regardless of the variation in strengths, doesn't make a bit of sense to me at all. Actually, when I think about where it's coming from, it makes sense because I understand what's behind it. That doesn't mean I think it's right.
I selected no comment because I've already expressed myself, and the question is somewhat open for me. It makes sense in that I get the logic behind it. That doesn't mean the execution of changing it on a dime makes sense to me, and the idea that any Match is fair if the War Rating is the same, regardless of the variation in strengths, doesn't make a bit of sense to me at all. Actually, when I think about where it's coming from, it makes sense because I understand what's behind it. That doesn't mean I think it's right.
War rating being the same means the teams are equally matched, again PI does not determine str alone, some alliances could do better because they have better players.
No, War Rating does not mean they're equally Matched, and implying that after the system was different for 9 or 10 Seasons is just ignorant to the variations that exist.
Yeah this AW is making sense and a lot of people are leaving alliances for AQ based alliances! Lmaoπ€£
With their low prestige. Lol.
The higher prestige alliances are rejoicing.
Yeah because of this nonsense matchmaking. With this sort of war matches how can one even expect to go up?
By growing your roster, duh. We spent 2020 gradually sliding down the AW ranks because we were rapidly climbing up the AQ ranks - building prestige and thus getting trapped in coin flip after coin flip. If weβre in the top 500 in AQ, thereβs no way we should be outside the top 4500 in war.
No, War Rating does not mean they're equally Matched, and implying that after the system was different for 9 or 10 Seasons is just ignorant to the variations that exist.
It did not prior to this season, but it is moving that way with this change. You will move up or down based on your skill of play. Will there be a little variation? Sure, but it will be no where near as bad as it was in the prior seasons.
No, War Rating does not mean they're equally Matched, and implying that after the system was different for 9 or 10 Seasons is just ignorant to the variations that exist.
Thatβs the exact problem they are fixing right now. Youβre just an unfortunate casualty who is being put in their proper place. Sucks to lose, but whether or not it was intentional through shell alliance/tanking, or just getting lucky, youβre alliance was somewhere they shouldnβt have ended up in the first place.
I'm not actually. My Matches are fine. Other people are. That "fixing" is exactly why War Rating doesn't mean the Matches are equally Matched. People can keep brushing this off all they like because the system is "fixing", but that just makes my point for me. As for Tanking and Shells, they were the reason War Rating failed us to begin with. So wrong on that front as well.
No, War Rating does not mean they're equally Matched, and implying that after the system was different for 9 or 10 Seasons is just ignorant to the variations that exist.
It did not prior to this season, but it is moving that way with this change. You will move up or down based on your skill of play. Will there be a little variation? Sure, but it will be no where near as bad as it was in the prior seasons.
Prior Seasons had people matched with strengths within range of their own as well. Not sure what you're getting at there.
No, War Rating does not mean they're equally Matched, and implying that after the system was different for 9 or 10 Seasons is just ignorant to the variations that exist.
It did not prior to this season, but it is moving that way with this change. You will move up or down based on your skill of play. Will there be a little variation? Sure, but it will be no where near as bad as it was in the prior seasons.
Prior Seasons had people matched with strengths within range of their own as well. Not sure what you're getting at there.
No, they had people matched based on their prestige, not their str, which meant that people with high skill would be placed against people with low skill just because they had low prestige. The old system is the perfect counter to your beliefs. This is why mid skilled alliances were able to out rank high skill alliances.
Comments
Compensation for 10+ seasons of this circus should be the real conversation π
You do not care how you win only that you do win, however you seem very concerned about how others win!
God bless kabam.
They finished P4 last season us G2.
As for Tanking and Shells, they were the reason War Rating failed us to begin with. So wrong on that front as well.