BG is a nice example, but as you can see, he has invested and he still does invest a loooooot of time into the game, and he still has this big difference between him and the big accounts, and still his account is much bigger than me, having like 3 to 4 times the amount of R4s I have, and Idk if he already got some R5s, but still, he is able to GET TO GC, but he is not really "the best of the best" as Jax said, obviously due to the F2P vs P2W/P2F differences, Im at a similar ranks right now as he is, I didnt reach GC yet but probably will next week, but I didnt talk about reaching to GC or not.
My point is how a Win vs a much bigger account gives you the same amount or rp or medals in this case, than the wins you can get vs similar or weaker accounts, if your skill outcomes the difference in roster, you are a better player than those big accounts that are on Diamond or Vibranium, but due to this you are still unable to win enough matches in a row because 1 out of 3 at least is as skilled as you but with a much bigger account so you will lose to them, what I want something to acknowledge the skill of the players, not only the roster
You can't use BG as an example. He makes a job out of that. I mean, good on him. He's just not something Players can aspire to. That's half the reason people think there's actually a chance at keeping up with people who spend mass amounts of money.
I can understand saying this for players like Slayer of Gods, MSD, Lagacy etc who are big spenders but why can't players aspire to be like BG? Put YouTube aside, what aspect of Brian Grants account and accomplishments in Battlegrounds can players never be able to reach?
He doesn't spend money so it's not like he's buying EMs to advance. He doesn't buy energy refills that I'm aware of. He doesn't buy crystals to get better champions. So what is out of reach for players?
Because apparently its his job to be good because he makes a living out of it. He doesnt make a living out of it because he is good at it, its the other way around 🤣
"only whales can win" said by average joe, 14k prestiege, calls himself active cause he does his arena milestones and EQ every month. Saves his units for 4th of july unit offers and belongs to a chill AQ Map5 and 2 BG Gold tier War to complete his 5 wars required to qualify for rewards.
Yes whales have their huge advantage, they also have to maintain those accounts. High tier wars, high AQ... but they only win cause they spend 🤣
BG is a nice example, but as you can see, he has invested and he still does invest a loooooot of time into the game, and he still has this big difference between him and the big accounts, and still his account is much bigger than me, having like 3 to 4 times the amount of R4s I have, and Idk if he already got some R5s, but still, he is able to GET TO GC, but he is not really "the best of the best" as Jax said, obviously due to the F2P vs P2W/P2F differences, Im at a similar ranks right now as he is, I didnt reach GC yet but probably will next week, but I didnt talk about reaching to GC or not.
My point is how a Win vs a much bigger account gives you the same amount or rp or medals in this case, than the wins you can get vs similar or weaker accounts, if your skill outcomes the difference in roster, you are a better player than those big accounts that are on Diamond or Vibranium, but due to this you are still unable to win enough matches in a row because 1 out of 3 at least is as skilled as you but with a much bigger account so you will lose to them, what I want something to acknowledge the skill of the players, not only the roster
If he has an account that is much bigger than yours then you haven't put in nearly the time you're claiming.
Brian isn't making a living out of playing MCOC! He rarely uploads videos. And those livestreams are not a reliable source of income. And he only plays the game while streaming.
BG is a nice example, but as you can see, he has invested and he still does invest a loooooot of time into the game, and he still has this big difference between him and the big accounts, and still his account is much bigger than me, having like 3 to 4 times the amount of R4s I have, and Idk if he already got some R5s, but still, he is able to GET TO GC, but he is not really "the best of the best" as Jax said, obviously due to the F2P vs P2W/P2F differences, Im at a similar ranks right now as he is, I didnt reach GC yet but probably will next week, but I didnt talk about reaching to GC or not.
My point is how a Win vs a much bigger account gives you the same amount or rp or medals in this case, than the wins you can get vs similar or weaker accounts, if your skill outcomes the difference in roster, you are a better player than those big accounts that are on Diamond or Vibranium, but due to this you are still unable to win enough matches in a row because 1 out of 3 at least is as skilled as you but with a much bigger account so you will lose to them, what I want something to acknowledge the skill of the players, not only the roster
So spending a lot of time in the game means you're going to be great at BGs automatically? I don't understand.
Clearly after reading the comments you guys are thinking about other things that Im not even mentioning, so Ill make it quick, fast and easy:
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Clearly after reading the comments you guys are thinking about other things that Im not even mentioning, so Ill make it quick, fast and easy:
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
I'm still waiting on the answer of defining the bigger account. What makes the other account much bigger, "twice as much" as you have said.
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Why on earth should that even be a thing? What if the "stronger? account has connection issues? What if their game crashes?
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
Clearly after reading the comments you guys are thinking about other things that Im not even mentioning, so Ill make it quick, fast and easy:
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
That's so subjective though, what is a "bigger account", total hero rating, number of 6 and 7* champs, number of rank 3 or higher champs? It'd be so subjective and would probably cause a ton of issues with battlegrounds trying to categorize every account in the game into small vs big accounts.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
You can't use BG as an example. He makes a job out of that. I mean, good on him. He's just not something Players can aspire to. That's half the reason people think there's actually a chance at keeping up with people who spend mass amounts of money.
They are looking for "the best of the best" and one of the best f2p if not the best one can't be used as an example, very interesting take.
As an example of how spending doesn't matter? No. It's not an example that applies to everyone.
Good old GW arguments, pick the parts that he can refute, what about the skill part? Are you saying that it doesn't apply to everyone cause they are not skillful? Yet they want rewards? Seems entitled to me 🤣
I never said he wasn't skilled. Sounds like you're picking the argument yourself.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Why on earth should that even be a thing? What if the "stronger? account has connection issues? What if their game crashes?
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
If the game crashes so much that's is actually an issue then 1. Kabam needs to fix their game or 2. You need to buy a new phone.
I haven't played any games that have the exact same mechanics like the one OP is asking for but games like Dead by Daylight do have very similar ones with MMR. You win against someone with less MMR than you, you get the same amount of points or sometimes less if your MMR is way above theirs. When you beat someone with a higher MMR than yours, you get more points than you normally would by beating someone with same or lower MMR than you.
Clearly after reading the comments you guys are thinking about other things that Im not even mentioning, so Ill make it quick, fast and easy:
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
I'm still waiting on the answer of defining the bigger account. What makes the other account much bigger, "twice as much" as you have said.
Ill showcase my own, I have 9 R4s, 6 7*R1s, and the rest are R3s, 3 of the 6* and all the 7* being undupped, I usually play vs at least 4 to 6 R5s, a couple 7 R2s, 3 or 4 7*R1s and the rest R4 6*, this being the average ones Im getting match with at least the last 2 days on D1, those ARE NOT the ones im talking about, since vs this guys im still able to win maybe 60% of times, BUT, at least yesterday, which is why I posted this, I got vs some titans in a row, people with half R5s, only R2 7*, all dupped, even some from Titan Crystals, and obviously, R3 to R4 in most cases is already enough difference to make you lose with similar skills and in some cases maybe even being better depending on the champs, but R5s and R2s vs my roster is already a decent difference, maybe Im exagerating and that due to having to play vs 4 of those in a row, but I dont think a win vs this accounts with mine, has the same value as winning a similar one.
You can't use BG as an example. He makes a job out of that. I mean, good on him. He's just not something Players can aspire to. That's half the reason people think there's actually a chance at keeping up with people who spend mass amounts of money.
They are looking for "the best of the best" and one of the best f2p if not the best one can't be used as an example, very interesting take.
As an example of how spending doesn't matter? No. It's not an example that applies to everyone.
Good old GW arguments, pick the parts that he can refute, what about the skill part? Are you saying that it doesn't apply to everyone cause they are not skillful? Yet they want rewards? Seems entitled to me 🤣
I never said he wasn't skilled. Sounds like you're picking the argument yourself.
The best F2P player shows for years how he can be succesful as a F2P player and until recent shows how he is able to hang in a top alliance, also decides to quit because he feels like he is holding back one of the best alliances; but that's not an example that applies to everyone. Skill overcoming spending up to a point is not something that applies to EVERY player. Why are you even playing then?
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
Clearly after reading the comments you guys are thinking about other things that Im not even mentioning, so Ill make it quick, fast and easy:
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
I'm still waiting on the answer of defining the bigger account. What makes the other account much bigger, "twice as much" as you have said.
Ill showcase my own, I have 9 R4s, 6 7*R1s, and the rest are R3s, 3 of the 6* and all the 7* being undupped, I usually play vs at least 4 to 6 R5s, a couple 7 R2s, 3 or 4 7*R1s and the rest R4 6*, this being the average ones Im getting match with at least the last 2 days on D1, those ARE NOT the ones im talking about, since vs this guys im still able to win maybe 60% of times, BUT, at least yesterday, which is why I posted this, I got vs some titans in a row, people with half R5s, only R2 7*, all dupped, even some from Titan Crystals, and obviously, R3 to R4 in most cases is already enough difference to make you lose with similar skills and in some cases maybe even being better depending on the champs, but R5s and R2s vs my roster is already a decent difference, maybe Im exagerating and that due to having to play vs 4 of those in a row, but I dont think a win vs this accounts with mine, has the same value as winning a similar one.
Yeah sorry but as much detail as you put, I don't see it. The difference is roster variety, and lack of rank ups on your side. A few more R5s and 7*s is not an excuse to gain more points.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
If its 5k or 6k dif in prestiege and it beats me legit, no disconnection or anything.. yeah give him the 2x points, hell give him 5x and force me to do a Post of shame in the forums so everyone can laugh and point at me 🤣
I think Victory Track should be something that everyone is eventually able to clear. It should be more difficult for lower accounts and/or less skilled players, but given enough effort, even relatively new players should be able to make it all the way to the end.
Gladiator's Circuit should be the competitive ladder. Once you're there, the kid's gloves should come off and you should have to face full R5/R2 rosters even if you're uncollected. If you want to move up here, you should have no handicap or advantage because your roster is relatively weak.
That would give the tryhards a surmountable mountain to climb while giving the truly skilled and elite players the pvp ladder challenge that the game mode was intended to provide.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
If its 5k or 6k dif in prestiege and it beats me legit, no disconnection or anything.. yeah give him the 2x points, hell give him 5x and force me to do a Post of shame in the forums so everyone can laugh and point at me 🤣
Yeah, sounds ridiculous but there are a lot of ptw whales who have unitmanned all content in game and sometimes do lose lol you can laugh, I do too but it happens.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Why on earth should that even be a thing? What if the "stronger? account has connection issues? What if their game crashes?
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
If the game crashes so much that's is actually an issue then 1. Kabam needs to fix their game or 2. You need to buy a new phone.
I haven't played any games that have the exact same mechanics like the one OP is asking for but games like Dead by Daylight do have very similar ones with MMR. You win against someone with less MMR than you, you get the same amount of points or sometimes less if your MMR is way above theirs. When you beat someone with a higher MMR than yours, you get more points than you normally would by beating someone with same or lower MMR than you.
You're deflecting the point. Why should a lower account get extra medals for winning in those cases I just listed. Did they actually win?
Giving extra for beating a "stronger" team doesn't exist really anywhere. Can you imagine that a 5 and 9 football team gets an extra win for beating a 9 and 5 team?
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
If its 5k or 6k dif in prestiege and it beats me legit, no disconnection or anything.. yeah give him the 2x points, hell give him 5x and force me to do a Post of shame in the forums so everyone can laugh and point at me 🤣
Yeah, sounds ridiculous but there are a lot of ptw whales who have unitmanned all content in game and sometimes do lose lol you can laugh, I do too but it happens.
You know what, if that happens let it be and reward them extra lol, I mean who am I to judge dreams when I buy a powerball ticket once in a while 🤣
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Why on earth should that even be a thing? What if the "stronger? account has connection issues? What if their game crashes?
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
If the game crashes so much that's is actually an issue then 1. Kabam needs to fix their game or 2. You need to buy a new phone.
I haven't played any games that have the exact same mechanics like the one OP is asking for but games like Dead by Daylight do have very similar ones with MMR. You win against someone with less MMR than you, you get the same amount of points or sometimes less if your MMR is way above theirs. When you beat someone with a higher MMR than yours, you get more points than you normally would by beating someone with same or lower MMR than you.
You're deflecting the point. Why should a lower account get extra medals for winning in those cases I just listed. Did they actually win?
Giving extra for beating a "stronger" team doesn't exist really anywhere. Can you imagine that a 5 and 9 football team gets an extra win for beating a 9 and 5 team?
If it's a disconnection issue sure, it doesn't count. If it's a forfeit though, it absolutely should, tanking is scummy.
It does, that's exactly how MMR works. Both Dead by Daylight and Overwatch have MMR and that's how it works, go look it up instead of replying with "it's not true because I said so".
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
If its 5k or 6k dif in prestiege and it beats me legit, no disconnection or anything.. yeah give him the 2x points, hell give him 5x and force me to do a Post of shame in the forums so everyone can laugh and point at me 🤣
Yeah, sounds ridiculous but there are a lot of ptw whales who have unitmanned all content in game and sometimes do lose lol you can laugh, I do too but it happens.
You know what, if that happens let it be and reward them extra lol, I mean who am I to judge dreams when I buy a powerball ticket once in a while 🤣
Lol yes it will be a rare occurrence but that's the only way I see something like this working, you'd be surprised how many ptw whales will die to a 5* sig 100 Korg with an r4 Kitty though.
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Dude 10 times higher? Really? That's either a disconnect or tanking lol
That's the only way I'd see anything like this working, the difference in roster size would have to be big, and if this discourages people from tanking then they can kill two birds with one stone.
So basically you are asking for a 1 in a million shot. A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
That's too big of a difference lol when I said ten times it wasn't accurate, that comment was about how you and other people derailed the thread for no reason, not the whole medal thing OP suggested. If you want to talk about how big the difference in prestige should actually be in my opinion, then I think 6k would be reasonable. Still highly unlikely they'll win and they'll probably lose 9 times out of 10 but I don't think it would hurt any specific players except the ones that tank so why not.
If its 5k or 6k dif in prestiege and it beats me legit, no disconnection or anything.. yeah give him the 2x points, hell give him 5x and force me to do a Post of shame in the forums so everyone can laugh and point at me 🤣
Yeah, sounds ridiculous but there are a lot of ptw whales who have unitmanned all content in game and sometimes do lose lol you can laugh, I do too but it happens.
You know what, if that happens let it be and reward them extra lol, I mean who am I to judge dreams when I buy a powerball ticket once in a while 🤣
Lol yes it will be a rare occurrence but that's the only way I see something like this working, you'd be surprised how many ptw whales will die to a 5* sig 100 Korg with an r4 Kitty though.
That's just 1 round out of 3 though, continuing my powerball ticket reference i hit 1 number out of 6 before, didn't win anything but i did get 1 number right 🤣
Congrats to everyone who derailed the thread and somehow made it about matchmaking when that's not what the post was about at all. This was about rewarding weaker accounts when they do beat a player ten times stronger than them.
Why on earth should that even be a thing? What if the "stronger? account has connection issues? What if their game crashes?
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
If the game crashes so much that's is actually an issue then 1. Kabam needs to fix their game or 2. You need to buy a new phone.
I haven't played any games that have the exact same mechanics like the one OP is asking for but games like Dead by Daylight do have very similar ones with MMR. You win against someone with less MMR than you, you get the same amount of points or sometimes less if your MMR is way above theirs. When you beat someone with a higher MMR than yours, you get more points than you normally would by beating someone with same or lower MMR than you.
You're deflecting the point. Why should a lower account get extra medals for winning in those cases I just listed. Did they actually win?
Giving extra for beating a "stronger" team doesn't exist really anywhere. Can you imagine that a 5 and 9 football team gets an extra win for beating a 9 and 5 team?
If it's a disconnection issue sure, it doesn't count. If it's a forfeit though, it absolutely should, tanking is scummy.
It does, that's exactly how MMR works. Both Dead by Daylight and Overwatch have MMR and that's how it works, go look it up instead of replying with "it's not true because I said so".
How are either of those games comparable to BGs in MCOC?
Comments
My point is how a Win vs a much bigger account gives you the same amount or rp or medals in this case, than the wins you can get vs similar or weaker accounts, if your skill outcomes the difference in roster, you are a better player than those big accounts that are on Diamond or Vibranium, but due to this you are still unable to win enough matches in a row because 1 out of 3 at least is as skilled as you but with a much bigger account so you will lose to them, what I want something to acknowledge the skill of the players, not only the roster
Yes whales have their huge advantage, they also have to maintain those accounts. High tier wars, high AQ... but they only win cause they spend 🤣
If you win vs a much bigger account, you should get more than 1 medal, maybe 1 and a half or 2, since its harder for you to win, so it means that you are way better than the player you are matching.
Nobody cares about matchmaking, Im okay with fighting BeroMan or Lagacy, the point is that right now, roster makes more difference than skill, at least at Diamond/Vibranium.
Where does beating a "Stronger" account ever equal to gaining more than beating an "equal" account? What game out there has this mechanic?
A 1.5k prestiege account beating a 15k account for example lol I would be fine with that lol
Give them 20 coins and an instant pass to Plat2 if that ever happens 🤣
I haven't played any games that have the exact same mechanics like the one OP is asking for but games like Dead by Daylight do have very similar ones with MMR. You win against someone with less MMR than you, you get the same amount of points or sometimes less if your MMR is way above theirs. When you beat someone with a higher MMR than yours, you get more points than you normally would by beating someone with same or lower MMR than you.
Skill overcoming spending up to a point is not something that applies to EVERY player.
Why are you even playing then?
Gladiator's Circuit should be the competitive ladder. Once you're there, the kid's gloves should come off and you should have to face full R5/R2 rosters even if you're uncollected. If you want to move up here, you should have no handicap or advantage because your roster is relatively weak.
That would give the tryhards a surmountable mountain to climb while giving the truly skilled and elite players the pvp ladder challenge that the game mode was intended to provide.
Giving extra for beating a "stronger" team doesn't exist really anywhere. Can you imagine that a 5 and 9 football team gets an extra win for beating a 9 and 5 team?
It does, that's exactly how MMR works. Both Dead by Daylight and Overwatch have MMR and that's how it works, go look it up instead of replying with "it's not true because I said so".