A thought out solution to trading in MCOC that could be beneficial to kabam and players


Trading would go hard
Especially if you had to pay a fee like 300- 1k units per trade.
From 1* - 7*
1 trade per player per month
I think as long as they did it in a way, that wouldn't promote using multiple accounts to get better pulls then it would be fine
So obviously they would have to be some limit to it
Maybe the champions being traded would have to be within a certain pi of each other.
Like no bigger than a 5k pi difference
R3 for R3 type stuff
But once per month per player
So couldn't swap over a whole roster
Just 1 champ of similar PI
That way, you couldn't give your brand new account a rnk 3 7 star for a 3*

I know it doesn't exist
But would be a good idea for the players to get a better value for their units and to have a bigger percentage of players spending their units monthly on there one trade

Mabey 1.5k per 7* they could find something that was reasonable
You arent getting an extra seven star, you're just trading


And if trading once per month is too frequent mabey once every 3 months or once a year on banquet but again would be a good idea

And maybe only champs from previous years would be tradeable like 2025 champs would be locked until 2026 for trading and so on
«13

Comments

  • DocWestDocWest Member Posts: 439 ★★★
    lol
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    ahmynuts said:

    No

    Your argument makes a good point very insightful probably just read the headline
  • KoiBoy18KoiBoy18 Member Posts: 350 ★★★
    No
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    ahmynuts said:

    ahmynuts said:

    No

    Your argument makes a good point very insightful probably just read the headline
    Oh no. I read it. It wasnt well thought out at all and still a horrible idea
    The only thing that wasn't thought out was your reply.

    Saying the idea is bad isn't any reason it wouldn't work.

    maybe think out you're reply and point out where the flaw in my logic is
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    I asked 20 + valiants on discord about it, to tweak out the idea but I think it's doable
  • VendemiaireVendemiaire Member Posts: 2,212 ★★★★★
    No.
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    People will always have a champ that they're looking for that someone else doesn't want.
    And once / twice a year it would be really useful for any progression.
    The lower * would be cheaper to trade 7* would be the most expensive
    Kabam could find a reasonable price
    Unit wise
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4

    People generally don't want to buy revives for content for 40 units, why would they spend so much to trade?

    I appreciate you putting in actual input rather than just saying no .
  • TerraTerra Member Posts: 8,659 ★★★★★
    No.

    That's the answer you deserve for a stupid suggestion like this.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,914 Guardian
    The risk of Abuse, Scams, etc is too high. Besides for going against the whole method for acquiring champs you desire.

    That's why (Abuse, etc) they did away with things like Holiday Gifting (of other stuff) years ago.

    By limiting it, you're basically saying “it's OK to rob a bank, so long as it's only once a year”.

    Of course a lot of people would be in favor of it if you ask Global (etc), but that doesn’t make it a good idea.

    Trading between Alt.Accounts (even if just once a year, but initially you said maybe once a month, lol)

    Abuse/Scams - even if fair, and you agree with someone, it's a matter of “who goes first”. OK, you gave me yours, but I change my mind, I’m not sending you mine in return.
    Or, real world money changing hands as part of “Trades”, etc.

    And Kabam is not gonna implement a whole lot of time/code/etc to making a trading platform whereby trades need to be done by both sides before the champs actually trade hands, etc. Yes, that could solve *some* problems, but still no incentive on Kabam's part to make it easier for people to get highly desirable champs and thus not purchase Feature Crystals etc anymore, because they can just trade with some “throwaway” account to get them.
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4
    ..
    Terra said:

    No.

    That's the answer you deserve for a stupid suggestion like this.

    Again you opinion...

    I find it funny the people that are calling my post dumb use 0% of their brain to actually point out something wrong in my proposal
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33

    The risk of Abuse, Scams, etc is too high. Besides for going against the whole method for acquiring champs you desire.

    That's why (Abuse, etc) they did away with things like Holiday Gifting (of other stuff) years ago.

    By limiting it, you're basically saying “it's OK to rob a bank, so long as it's only once a year”.

    Of course a lot of people would be in favor of it if you ask Global (etc), but that doesn’t make it a good idea.

    Trading between Alt.Accounts (even if just once a year, but initially you said maybe once a month, lol)

    Abuse/Scams - even if fair, and you agree with someone, it's a matter of “who goes first”. OK, you gave me yours, but I change my mind, I’m not sending you mine in return.
    Or, real world money changing hands as part of “Trades”, etc.

    And Kabam is not gonna implement a whole lot of time/code/etc to making a trading platform whereby trades need to be done by both sides before the champs actually trade hands, etc. Yes, that could solve *some* problems, but still no incentive on Kabam's part to make it easier for people to get highly desirable champs and thus not purchase Feature Crystals etc anymore, because they can just trade with some “throwaway” account to get them.

    Thanks for a actual reply in giving good feedback
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33

    The risk of Abuse, Scams, etc is too high. Besides for going against the whole method for acquiring champs you desire.

    That's why (Abuse, etc) they did away with things like Holiday Gifting (of other stuff) years ago.

    By limiting it, you're basically saying “it's OK to rob a bank, so long as it's only once a year”.

    Of course a lot of people would be in favor of it if you ask Global (etc), but that doesn’t make it a good idea.

    Trading between Alt.Accounts (even if just once a year, but initially you said maybe once a month, lol)

    Abuse/Scams - even if fair, and you agree with someone, it's a matter of “who goes first”. OK, you gave me yours, but I change my mind, I’m not sending you mine in return.
    Or, real world money changing hands as part of “Trades”, etc.

    And Kabam is not gonna implement a whole lot of time/code/etc to making a trading platform whereby trades need to be done by both sides before the champs actually trade hands, etc. Yes, that could solve *some* problems, but still no incentive on Kabam's part to make it easier for people to get highly desirable champs and thus not purchase Feature Crystals etc anymore, because they can just trade with some “throwaway” account to get them.

    In my idea you can't trade New champs so no champs in a feature would be available on non current year champs.
    so still an incentive to buy the new champs ,they could even do in a way where it wasn't units you pay $15-$20 to trade
    Also my idea would involve a system were both players enter a trading system and it would exchange both champions at the same time an only equal value champs could be traded so rnk 3 for rnk 3
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4
    I understand what you were saying, but I think that there is a logistical way that is do able. it would mainly just be a way.To hunt down older champs that you never got
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 7,575 ★★★★★
    I trade you my 6* Groot.fot.your 7* Serpent...
    Yeah that's gonna go so well...
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33

    I trade you my 6* Groot.fot.your 7* Serpent...
    Yeah that's gonna go so well...

    Only a 7* for 7* same rnk for same rnk
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    No 5* for a 6* etc or no 7* rnk 1 for a 7* rnk 2
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    Otherwise you are trading, rank up, gems, etc
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4

    I trade you my 6* Groot.fot.your 7* Serpent...
    Yeah that's gonna go so well...

    So again to simplify it, you could only trade a 7* rnk 2 serpent for a rnk 2 7*
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,914 Guardian
    Still. Do you want Real Money transactions to start happening (on eBay or other even more dark money sites) ?

    And then people will buy champs using illegal money means (stolen credit cards or Play cards, etc).
    And then trade will happen (in game), and since game will not actually be party to the Real World money aspect, when your bank takes your money away because it was illegal money that person offered to you, you will be the one out of luck.

    And good luck trying to ask Game to reverse the trade at that point.

    Etc.

    *which, was really happening back when Holiday Gifting was around.
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4

    Still. Do you want Real Money transactions to start happening (on eBay or other even more dark money sites) ?

    And then people will buy champs using illegal money means (stolen credit cards or Play cards, etc).
    And then trade will happen (in game), and since game will not actually be party to the Real World money aspect, when your bank takes your money away because it was illegal money that person offered to you, you will be the one out of luck.

    And good luck trying to ask Game to reverse the trade at that point.

    Etc.

    *which, was really happening back when Holiday Gifting was around.

    It would only be for alliance members that you've had for over thirty days before banquet or add another criteria to it to stop online sales
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    I don't see that being an issue once a year
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33
    edited March 4
    Or maybe current friends that you've had for over thirty days before banquet or whatever event it would be on
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,914 Guardian
    People quitting the game would just sell (I mean “trade”) their champs for a ton of real money to anyone who wants to “buy” their champs.

    People already get “bought” whole accounts banned after they buy them. But you're introducing a legal way to do that now.

    And even if you say “equal Star/Rank”, well, if someone has the Rankup resources, they could just take any of their scrub champs up, to trade for an actual CHAMP that they don’t have yet.

    (They have resources, just not the right champs).
  • Call_Me_Wap2Call_Me_Wap2 Member Posts: 33

    People quitting the game would just sell (I mean “trade”) their champs for a ton of real money to anyone who wants to “buy” their champs.

    People already get “bought” whole accounts banned after they buy them. But you're introducing a legal way to do that now.

    And even if you say “equal Star/Rank”, well, if someone has the Rankup resources, they could just take any of their scrub champs up, to trade for an actual CHAMP that they don’t have yet.

    (They have resources, just not the right champs).

    That way, there would be no way to buy rank ups only the materials you buy or get through story and the people that have there accounts that are old could only sell one champ per year. And they would have to plan it over a month in advance. It's not like they're going to be making a business off of it
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,019 ★★★★★
    Wrong
Sign In or Register to comment.