**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Comments
If that sounds logical to you then you're not thinking.
But, I think communication here should have been improved and firstly, more clear communication that it was bugged in the first place, and secondly, an announcement that it was getting fixed before it was fixed.
Having said that, overall it’s still an incredibly powerful relic, and 5* and 6* versions are still going to be wildly impactful. I just think communication should have been improved here.
That’s what makes me think that it’s a fix that went live early, because it’s over the weekend. There hasn’t been any official word on it yet
Here's what my 4* relic used to be:
And a screenshot of someone' 6* relic:
Couldn't find any images of the 5*, but I'd assume it would've been around 2300 or so Yeah, that's likely the case. But they still should have said something MUCH sooner. I read about this a month or so back, from a comment in Vega's Youtube comment section by Kam but he never elaborated any further when asked about it.
I was tempted to make a thread here asking about it, but figured it probably wouldn't go over well.
Yes, this is still an indirect nerf, it's not a shadow nerf but it's an indirect nerf regardless.
This relic was bugged and a bug was fixed.
Something is different that’s significantly less advantageous to the player after existing in its previous state for a fair amount of time
+
No communication or notice was given that the “something” is being or has been changed
=
People make the not unreasonable presumption that the “something” being changed counts (more or less) as a nerf that they had to discover on their own.
As someone who has the 5* relic on one of my main attackers, it would be nice to know whether that presumption is correct or not.
Dr. Zola
Why aren't you complaining about this "indirect nerf"?
What about some of the other examples here?
Was Crossbones indirectly buffed since they fixed an issue with his cool down for overrun?
Genuinely curious to know your thoughts.
Sometime between when Kabam said he was working as intended and the people noticed the stun was a debuff and not passive anymore. It's very easy to find on the forum.
So back to countless.... Give me 5 more.