**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Rank down tickets for Zemo and Kraven…
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I could be wrong at how this will play out, but I don't think I will be.
This thread was really just hypin' me up to r5 Kate at this point.
We all know that player retention is a problem in this game, but such tactics is only making the few remaining players give up and leave. We are not asking for anything unreasonable out of the blue, a mistake was made in the communication department and we just want something in return for all the resources we used because of this error. That is all.
They admitted the design team did not understand a mechanic they’d been using for over a year. Good on them for admitting a mistake.
They admitted the communication failed many times. Again, good on them for acknowledging failures.
Their sole justification for not issuing RDTs for Zemo is that the “bug” was posted on the Trello Board within his 3 month rebalance window. That’s it. No other justification provided.
In this case these are the only options I can come up with for Kabam’s position.
1. They completely overestimate how useful or used the Trello board is in its current state. If that’s the case I think the feedback here and across the forums should warrant a revisit to the decision. If that was the sole factor they overvalued it in the decision making process.
2. They know the Trello response was a joke but it was the only straw they could grasp to avoid dedicating resources to RDTs for Zemo and they either don’t have the resources or didn’t want to explain to their leadership why they had to spend resources on something for a champ right after they announced the rebalance.
If it’s 1, they should revisit and at least provide a response.
If it’s 2, then we have reason to question/doubt any future rebalance updates because they will use any possible argument to avoid remedying their mistakes. And I’ll view no response as confirmation of #2 because if it was #1 I’d expect them to also acknowledge another mistake in misjudging the value of a Trello post.
I'm sure they're aware people are upset. They were likely aware they would be upset when they made the decision. Sometimes things are revisited, and sometimes decisions are firm.
Do you think it would help if someone commented that they acknowledge the points made but the decision isn't changing, or do you think it would further exacerbate it?
Zemolock is disabled before a abysslike Super content Release?
So legacy can't win it the first day, right before seatin (can he zemolock?)?
“ Because this bug was publicly announced via the Trello board during the 3-month window where Zemo was subject to change, we do not plan to issue any rank-down tickets for him…”
If that’s the only reason, it’s reasonable to ask them to reconsider because that was a very ineffective way to do it. If they acknowledge it was ineffective but still point to it as the only reason that seems pretty contradictory.