Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
What about the interaction whit armor and armor rating?
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
What about the interaction whit armor and armor rating?
Has he always worked that way and you're just now noticing? Because shocker wasn't changed at all, and neither was armor, so his interaction with armor should be the same as it always has been.
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Damage is also reduced with armor opponents. Posted screenshots upper.
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Damage is also reduced with armor opponents. Posted screenshots upper.
Nothing to see here, i got confused with his abilities
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly.
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Can you please add that to the 40,000 page MCoC encyclopedia and operations manual ?
I just took my shocker to rank 2. This is diabolical the way you guys are able to go about changing things in the game. Like this is ridiculous. No message, no notes, no anything.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
That’s a big L. Even if it was unintentional why not just let it be. He was by no means game breaking it just added an extra layer of utility to his kit that you can’t find elsewhere. Also why wait so damn long to change it?
I guess I really am the king of bad luck I pull Thing twice in a row and then a champion I r4 ascended losses a lot of value because Kabam decided not to say a damn word before changing something... I was laughing about the Thing situation, but I'm not laughing anymore this is just messed up.
Whether you call it an intentional, unpublished nerf, or you classify it as another champ introduced 12 months ago who was bugged the whole time and is now fixed, it sucks. Lots of us have invested resources in good faith based on the information available to us. And now those investments are worth less.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere
It was a live fix that happened last Friday. Didn't need the client to be updated so not hot fix but will be on the patch notes of the may update.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
That’s a big L. Even if it was unintentional why not just let it be. He was by no means game breaking it just added an extra layer of utility to his kit that you can’t find elsewhere. Also why wait so damn long to change it?
It sounds like it wasn't Shocker that was changed, but the mechanics of glancing that were changed and Shocker is just the most obvious example. If that's the case, they can't just "let it be" because such bugs will have all sorts of downstream problems if left unchecked.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere
It was a live fix that happened last Friday. Didn't need the client to be updated so not hot fix but will be on the patch notes of the may update.
So you’re saying this is official and there’s no issues? Pardon my naivety but are you representing kabam? Didn’t see it in your bio. Pardon if I missed it.
I used shocker in 8.4 and normal 250k heavy were basically halved. No glance nodes on the path.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere
It was a live fix that happened last Friday. Didn't need the client to be updated so not hot fix but will be on the patch notes of the may update.
So you’re saying this is official and there’s no issues? Pardon my naivety but are you representing kabam? Didn’t see it in your bio. Pardon if I missed it
I am a forum guardian and don't officially represent kabam, but I do talk with the devs a lot and share insights of conversations there with y'all to help shed light on situations like this.
i wouldn't have ranked him if i knew he was like this. a r2 isn't exactly cheap, can we get shocker specific rankdown tickets? i know people will say it's a change to the mechanics and unrelated to shocker specifically, which is true, but this probably affects him the most?
Comments
Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000
Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2
Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Can you please add that to the 40,000 page MCoC encyclopedia and operations manual ?
Unless they changed something about this ability, he can still take on armored opponents with his 2500-3000+ crit rating
I pull Thing twice in a row and then a champion I r4 ascended losses a lot of value because Kabam decided not to say a damn word before changing something... I was laughing about the Thing situation, but I'm not laughing anymore this is just messed up.
I used shocker in 8.4 and normal 250k heavy were basically halved. No glance nodes on the path.
what do we do now?