**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Could you please answer on following questions:
1. Will it be possible to buy this subscription at any time? Or it should be bought at the specific time while it is introduced?
2. If I buy this subscription now, when I am "Uncollected", will it be automatically improved when I become "Cavalier"? Or it will be improved with Cavalier bonuses after next renewing?
Too bad, I was hoping that the game was on the rise with recent decisions. Like rotating the henchmen in AQ.
Most of their “deals” have missed the two resources that are missing from the game gold and T2 Alpha.
Frankly 100K week in gold is far from worth paying for.
Kabam has 170 employees. They have 4 offices (Vancouver, Montreal, San Francisco and Austin Texas).
For those 170 employees they have to pay for salaries, benefits and other types of standard employee stuff.
Pay for the lights, pay for the servers, pay for internet.
All the while making a profit. So that $200k is nothing really, but it helps to keep the wheels going on the game.
Also items limit should be increased for everyone. And please allow selling iso and catalyst from boxy thing where they expire
The Black Market, energy and inventory perks should be STANDARD for all, let the subscription INCREASE their respective value.
Players shouldn’t have to pay for access to these, let them pay for increased value to these.
2) No one said you cant play if you dont spend your sidestepping the argument. No one said as far as i recall that f2p players cant progress at all or cant play the game. Theyre just being pushed out of higher levels of competition and their relative level of progression has a growing disparity.
3) The "seperation" of spenders and non spenders has never involved quality of life. Crystals, revives, etc. Sure, but an energy reduction and inventory space has NEVER been paywalled. It was always toed to progression. Unless you are going to tell me spending is the next level after hitting 60.
here is the thing, you guys cannot even agree on what is the issue with the deal, it is not a problem with the deal, it is a problem with you wanting more free stuff. Shoot the Black Market is not even QOL which most of the people in this thread has stated is fine with being in the deal and not free. The other players only want QOL stuff.
Is a subscription with added benefits good, yes.
Should things we, as a community, have asked and begged for years to be implemented but only if you pay, no.
When it comes to a business and it’s customer base, yes. If you keep doing things your customers despise, you lose them.
While Kabam is making money already, they are spending a tremendous amount for these changes. As a business they need to recover that cost and gain a profit or they go out of business. They are not forcing the purchase, just offering it. If you really want this QOL change you spend if not, let it go.
Which of those two groups do you think something like this will have a larger negative response from?
Do I think this change warrants even a slight portion of the response it's gotten so far? Absolutely not. Nothing included in this really does anything to create a significant gap between those with it and those without. Certainly not as much as things like buying crystals and rank resource offers do.
Now if you really want to try to stop this, alliances drive spending, leave your alliance, stop spending and if you can get about 250 alliances of the top 1500 to disband and stop spending you might see change. Spending is really top heavy so they might not notice.
If free to play people stop downloading game, it’s loses is value in the App Stores. If pay to win players stop spending the company’s bottom line is directly affected.
At the end of the day both make for a successful game. Since free to play users are more plentiful it does pay to heed their feedback and make compromises, spenders will spend no matter what. The QOL changes we’ve begged for years to get being behind a paywall directly and negatively effects the larger F2P base and deserves being looked at and consider a compromise.
Nothing wrong with bonus perks for buying a subscription, bad form to have the QOL options we’ve wanted for years only if you pay.