Plantesan ★★
Comentarios
-
Wound be an improvement based on previous messages, to be honest, heh. Personal judgment aside…I was attempting to point out a possibility that OP might have behind the message, Nothing more 👍
-
Based on your ally sales pitch previously, why would this be an issue? (Might be worth keeping in mind deaths beyond the first 3 count against the defenders AB bonus. If the attackers only b-lined and died multiple times on say 3 champs…the death count becomes very misleading)
-
I could be wrong on this, but I’m going to guess it was more how it was presented/reads? *as in it could potentially sound condescending to some folks* 🤷♂️
-
It’s reasonable, early feedback for those that are also close to their own r5 opportunity. Geezus dude go pound sand a bit harder in the corner with that attitude. Congrats on the rank up, OP!
-
Another champ to add into the previously discussed champ mix (although this is specifically for the s1 hazard shift bottleneck into s2) if Void isn’t the defender, Silver Surfer covers the double immunity decent enough
-
This is merely a guess…Might be best to have the very low expectations of today being the earliest…most likely early next week…since the weekend is coming up 🤷♂️
-
Just means those abusing it are a bunch of spineless cowards…if you (those using it) can’t handle fighting, at least have the honor of taking the combo to your champ properly. Hopefully some kind of solution can be provided
-
I believe in Marvel lore, Magneto can’t manipulate pure vibranium…so BP being immune to his magnetism in-game makes sense.
-
Considering it’s a staple to the game week in and out (regardless of the value to the rewards) it would be nice to have these issues become non-issues. Otherwise how many miles are players willing to let that inch be stretched out? (For what it’s worth, only curious on a possible small update, beyond that the personal…
-
One would think by the third season whoever is running the BG end of things would have their collective stuff together…ah well…
-
Not sure if this was covered early on, not yet, or weren’t worried…has there been any word on whether kabam will consider bumping up the daily loyalty cap from the Alliance help tab? It feels to me that would be a good place to start with making sure there is some small buffer to the issue at hand. Thoughts?
-
Gotta love the random disagrees with NO FEEDBACK. Seriously, at this rate just ban all the top champs from AW. *heavy on the sarcasm* Apologies OP, HT is a solid investment.
-
I’m curious if kabam considered limiting the champ bans on any one champ to say 2 out of the 3 war matches in a week? It could make for a reasonable balance between their objective and players still being able to use those champs, rather than seeing ranked up HT being permanently benched due to everyone choosing spite.
-
1. Best not to assume anything, 2. Never said mods only…mostly frustrations from familiar names responding in what ends up coming off as condescending responses, when a simple ‘probably not’ would have worked towards OP question.
-
Jfc just let Miiike say some long-winded “no” response and be done with it. Some of you people need to stop answering for the mods, they do not need the help…
-
1. I was one that expected Kabam at the earliest to have rewards by normal reward distribution time (tomorrow) so this isn’t surprising to see happen. 2. I should’ve worded that better. I’m referring to that time gap players are referring to when it comes to getting the AW season rewards and moving to other alliances…
-
Question about that post you are referring …considering when it was posted to when the AW into its issue…Is it wrong to ask for some kind of initial delay or extension on the back end to the gifting event based on the time lost from the hiccup?
-
I could be mistaken, but if this is in reference to the gifting Event coming up and the minimum day requirement people need for it to count in a new ally, this delay does serve as a very inconvenient speed bump for those affected 🤷♂️?
-
I could be wrong, but I believe the fight duration might be the deciding factor in that match?
-
At this point, minor updates would do more wonders than the “thanks for your patience, please be patient, etc” sweet nothings. I’d hope people realize that it isn’t necessarily the mods fault this game decides to throw whatever tantrums at the worst time, they unfortunately take the brunt of what I’m sure other dept would…
-
Running into that issue in our ally too
-
So we can’t criticize them about it, when other solutions were provided? At this point I could care less about the rewards, it is what it is unfortunately. I’m curious if it would’ve been that much more of a pain in the ass to resend previous weeks rewards...compared to some people’ suggestion of delaying aq by a **** day…
-
Just tell the team to call it a week, prestige is already screwed up for people with that 30 minute aq round 🤷♂️
-
-
It’s damned if they do/don’t either way. Just find it funny they choose to screw over the mixed timezone folks and think 30-minute timers are gonna solve a sleep-scheduling issue. Doesn’t matter at this point since the day 1 timer is screwed up now
-
Just gotta change people’ work/sleep schedules and we’ll be good /s You know that time delay will cause issues with the players regardless of pushing the aq end cycle by 2 hours or not. Should’ve just cut your losses and dropped the week altogether instead of forcing it (I know that’s a week of rank up mats lost but what…
-
Yeah, figured it would be a pain somehow.
-
Looks like they updated the banner to mention 30 minute timers for this cycle
-
Understandable...same boat with epic mods map 7, just not worried if it’s pushed back, considering the stress this game provides (self-inflicted or not) a breather is never a bad thing
-
As much as it sucks (I’m in that boat as well) the window they gave did seem silly. OP might just want to express your thoughts to kabam and hopefully they look at it for next year 🤷♂️