Best Of

Easy solution, scrap the Traders Outpost and give a proper amount of Radiance. Simplify the currencies as promised. When I say proper I really mean a reasonable small ammount for the effort; but thats at least a simpler store that won't be botched with bundles of items thrown together.

Radiance is a competitive currency, it will not replace Mysterium.

We also never "promised" to simplify all other currencies - we said that if Radiance was successful, we would look into doing the same with engagement-based currencies.

Yes I know what radiance is and thank you for clarifying something we already knew.
Now can you explain why the SQ currency is being related to AQ, AW and BG to be earned? Not just being earned but "replaced" since the no SQ for a week seems to be a repeated thing now?.

It was clarified because it was suggested to replace Mysterium with Radiance.

I did not design the Side Quest this month, so I cannot explain the design choice to you, but I can tell you that all of the objectives were engagement-based, not rank-based.
It was asking you to defeat opponents in different modes; you didn't need to win anything.

Well then scrap the mysterium store, put little bits of radiance and ask us to defeat opponents in different modes without needing to win anything. Just ask us to engage. I mean you are already asking people to participate on this competitive modes for Mysterium, why can't it work the other way?

You're overlooking the distinction between competitive-based currency and engagement-based currency.

An engagement-based currency is something earned through active participation, interaction, or consistent activity within a platform, regardless of competitive outcomes. Nothing is asking you to outperform anybody else to acquire the Mysterium this month.

I understand why you would suggest replacing the Mysterium with Radiance, but that is not the purpose of the addition of Radiance.

Easy solution, scrap the Traders Outpost and give a proper amount of Radiance. Simplify the currencies as promised. When I say proper I really mean a reasonable small ammount for the effort; but thats at least a simpler store that won't be botched with bundles of items thrown together.

Radiance is a competitive currency, it will not replace Mysterium.

We also never "promised" to simplify all other currencies - we said that if Radiance was successful, we would look into doing the same with engagement-based currencies.

Yes I know what radiance is and thank you for clarifying something we already knew.
Now can you explain why the SQ currency is being related to AQ, AW and BG to be earned? Not just being earned but "replaced" since the no SQ for a week seems to be a repeated thing now?.

It was clarified because it was suggested to replace Mysterium with Radiance.

I did not design the Side Quest this month, so I cannot explain the design choice to you, but I can tell you that all of the objectives were engagement-based, not rank-based.
It was asking you to defeat opponents in different modes; you didn't need to win anything.

Well then scrap the mysterium store, put little bits of radiance and ask us to defeat opponents in different modes without needing to win anything. Just ask us to engage. I mean you are already asking people to participate on this competitive modes for Mysterium, why can't it work the other way?

Easy solution, scrap the Traders Outpost and give a proper amount of Radiance. Simplify the currencies as promised. When I say proper I really mean a reasonable small ammount for the effort; but thats at least a simpler store that won't be botched with bundles of items thrown together.

Radiance is a competitive currency, it will not replace Mysterium.

We also never "promised" to simplify all other currencies - we said that if Radiance was successful, we would look into doing the same with engagement-based currencies.

Yes I know what radiance is and thank you for clarifying something we already knew.
Now can you explain why the SQ currency is being related to AQ, AW and BG to be earned? Not just being earned but "replaced" since the no SQ for a week seems to be a repeated thing now?.

It was clarified because it was suggested to replace Mysterium with Radiance.

I did not design the Side Quest this month, so I cannot explain the design choice to you, but I can tell you that all of the objectives were engagement-based, not rank-based.
It was asking you to defeat opponents in different modes; you didn't need to win anything.

Took a decently long break from the game and might come back. What should I work on next? Also I have more champions so lmk if you think a different/other champion rank up would be better.

I’d suggest focusing on finishing up story content first since it’s pretty straightforward to clear and will help you build your roster for tougher endgame content like Everest challenges (Epoch, Ordeal, etc.), which offer solid rank-up mats and crystals that can pull some great champs. With Crucible on the way, it’s a good time to prep. From your roster, you’ve got some strong options like Okoye, Vox, Arcade, and Hulk—try getting them to at least Rank 3. Also, I’d recommend prioritizing your 7* champs over 6* when possible, though ranking up certain 6* is still worth it if they’re going to help you push content.

She's the kind of champion that I can take down rather easily as long as nothing goes wrong; but if anything does go wrong, it has a tendency to go catastrophically wrong. And it takes remarkably little for things to switch from "I'm in control, cool, cool, cool" to "AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!"

Maybe she won't let you intercept her before her next special? Suddenly all that damage is reflected. Maybe there's a power gain node? Sucks to be you then! Maybe there's an Invade meta that makes it very difficult to bait out heavy attacks for you to punish? God, I hated her in the recent Invade season of Battlegrounds.

If any of those things happen - or a myriad of others - then the very tentative control I have in fights against her quickly falls apart. So I would definitely still consider her a top defender.