Haven't read the whole thread, but my champs are throwing heavy attacks when I try to do a MLLLM combo randomly (happens in about 5 to 10% of my combos) I already updated but it's not resolved. Playing on a OnePlus 9 pro at 120frames.
The thing about DNA is that people like him (expert consultants probably) are usually stingy SOBs who protect their knowledge like it's gold so they can charge ridiculous consultant fees for it, yet he has given it away for free all these years for our benefit.
The thing about DNA is that people like him (expert consultants probably) are usually stingy SOBs who protect their knowledge like it's gold so they can charge ridiculous consultant fees for it, yet he has given it away for free all these years for our benefit. Well, no one would likely pay for my knowledge of the game regardless, but I think something to consider is credibility. Just because I've been around a long time, just because I have the yellow name, even just because I've gotten things right in the past, shouldn't automatically grant me a huge amount of credibility.What I think people should take into account is that I'm fallible, just like everyone else, and I get things wrong all the time, but the difference between me and perhaps some other posters is that I don't just say things, I back them up with details, analysis, inside information if I have it, and enough material to be refutable if I'm wrong. And people have proven me wrong in the past, because if I'm wrong, it is *obvious* that I'm wrong. Maybe not to the average player, but to knowledgeable people. Knowledgeable players have corrected me on game information. Numerically proficient players have correct me on calculation errors. Industry experts have corrected me on misstatements I've made about certain areas of expertise.I'm not just giving information away out of the goodness of my heart. I'm also giving enough information away to demonstrate that I believe I'm on solid ground, and I'm willing to be refuted by people who can spot the mistake, because *I* would rather be corrected than have incorrect information floating around.If you're not a developer, if you're not a systems engineer, if you're not a game designer, you might have no way to know whether I'm full of ****, or someone else saying I'm wrong is full of ****. What should such a person do, in that situation? They should recognize that even if they don't have that knowledge, there are people that do, and those people will eventually jump in to correct matters. If I see someone saying something completely wrong, that person might be me. But to mitigate the "he said she said" problem, I'll try to do so with enough specificity that I cannot just make it up: *anyone* know knows what's what will be able to tell if I'm a fraud. I'm willing to take that risk to back up what I say.Do the people who attempt to refute me seem as willing to take that same risk? Sometimes yes, often no. Readers need to judge for themselves, and ultimately make up their own minds. All I hope for is people don't agree or disagree with me because they like me or not, or like my posts or not. All I hope for is people judge them based on their validity, and their foundations. I hope people judge my posts that way, because I hope one day people judge everyone's posts that way.
The parry works as it should, but i still get random heavy attacks during my combos, and it's affecting wars heavily....
I just died against a thing boss in war when I had 83 percent health with hit monkey and thing had less than 30 percent health simply because my champ just stood still while I got destroyed for no reason at all.****