**UPDATE - iPAD STUCK FLICKERING SCREEN**
The 47.0.1 hotfix to address the issue of freezing & flashing lights on loading screens when trying to enter a fight, along with other smaller issues, is now ready to be downloaded through the App Store on IOS.
More information here.
The 47.0.1 hotfix to address the issue of freezing & flashing lights on loading screens when trying to enter a fight, along with other smaller issues, is now ready to be downloaded through the App Store on IOS.
More information here.
Comments
Please help !
I am sure there willbe a token to buy a choosable line of corse for a lot of money
In the past, Iβve been able to 100% all of them, like epic and legendary - despite having an absolutely terrible 6* roster and never using any of them.
But now for a Legendary run, I can only use 6*s, and I donβt have a single one even rank 2, so I could enter it, using my resource to enter a rift - and completely be obliterated and walk away empty?
Like, I understand if this particular one is meant to be above my play level, but itβs like completely going in blind not knowing if I can do it or not, essentially wasting the spot.
Release The Kraken!
Bugs, Nerfs and event cancellation is the summary
Either
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/315937/mystery-champion-objective-thread#latest
or
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/316047/october-duel-target-thread#latest
Why do you feel the need to quote a huge chunk of the original post that has nothing to do with what you are posting about and just makes it more annoying to scroll through? You didn't need to quote anything from the original post to make the point you were trying to but......
Since you felt the need to quote the original post why didn't you bother to READ it yourself since it contains the answer to your question? Do you understand chance/probability at all? You had a 90% chance on each run to just get candy. That is "exactly how "random"" it is.
Your use of quotes around the word random implies you think the game is cheating in some way and just giving you the worst outcome. Again, it is a 90% chance of a candy path, that isn't the game being rigged, they gave you the odds upfront.
As for your point about Kabam liking to make people pay for things so they should give a path selector....... As has been pointed out multiple times in this thread already, Kabam would most likely not have provided potential rewards as good as what the small % chance is for you to obtain now if there was a guaranteed way to get whichever path you wanted.
I do agree with you about the other complaints regarding the state of the game at the very end however.
Also, it is possible to tag Jax and other people whose names aren't coming up in the way you know how to do it when making posts. You need to use a quotation mark after the @ symbol.
And I did read the entire post before commenting but thanks for assuming that I didn't. I knew that there was a 90% chance to land on the Candy Path, but with each additional run, my chances to hit anything other than the Candy (in theory) should sightly increase, something that hasn't happened.
I'd debated not even replying to your comment as you seem incredibly pissy & aggressive (perhaps even toxic). I generally avoid back and forths when someone acknowledges me with the tone that you did, but I've started now so I'd might as well see it through as I'm not a fan of wasting time & effort. So if you're going to reply after this, please use some decorum & try to talk to me the way you'd want someone to talk to you.
Thanks.
All your previous runs (whether all candy or not) are done with and their outcomes are already known, they have no impact on future runs, of course.
Each additional run has it's own 90% chance, independent of whatever happened before.
Now, if you want to say IN IT'S ENTIRETY SO FAR, each additional run should improve your chances OVERALL, that would be correct only if the outcome of those previous runs were not already known.
A single additional run can not improve your overall chances in this case, having already known that the previous runs were all unsuccessful.
Candy working out fine for me.
To answer your question about you using or implying the word "cheating" - yes, in my interpretation of what you wrote you absolutely did. This may be another case of the difficulty of just reading something but in my experience when people use quotes around a word that isn't actually quoting some text it is meant sarcastically, like air quotes. It generally means you are expressing the opposite and, in this case, to claim that something that is RNG based is not random means that though they gave you the odds you do not believe they are being truthful with them, or they have modified them in some undisclosed way (or as some people occasionally post here, that specific accounts are being targeted with specific results in some way). I gave you the chance for the results you obtained to have occurred and based on the provided chance it was not unreasonable for that to have happened. Whether you or I feel the odds are fair or good enough is a separate matter, and not what you were expressing in your original post.
Maybe the word "cheating" is the issue, but that is just semantics. I think it was reasonable to interpret what you wrote as claiming that the results you obtained were not random despite that being the way the event was presented to us. Further, you said that the results did not, "feel "Random" even in the slightest." Maybe you actually meant to just say you felt an emotion about that, but I think almost anyone would view that statement as an accusation or assertion that it wasn't random.
My point about reading the post wasn't so much about literally saying you weren't reading it as it was to make the point that what I viewed as your claim that it wasn't random was not justified based solely upon the small number of runs overall you had already done and what the actual % chance was, based upon the original post you quoted with the odds of each path contained in it, for you to obtain the results you did.
I felt that you in fact were taking an aggressive tone (though not directed at me) that was not supported by the numbers and was also annoyed with the unnecessary quotation of a lot of the original post. I find it very tedious and frustrating to scroll through very long forum threads looking for replies from Kabam and people quoting huge chunks of previous posts that aren't directly relevant to their posts makes it even worse, especially when it gets into a back and forth of reply after reply with the quoted sections getting longer and longer. I think those factors probably contributed to what I view as the somewhat sarcastic posting I was attempting, though my frustration seeping through was viewed differently by you and so I again apologize for that.
I would also like to point out that I did say that I agreed with you about the other complaints you had mentioned and even told you how you can tag certain people who didn't come up for you in the list on the forums. That was my attempt at validating the points you made that I agreed with and not just shutting down everything you were saying and trying to be helpful to you. I am not out to antagonize other players, be provocative, be contrarian or a Kabam apologist.
I wish you good luck in your future runs, hopefully the RNG results go better for you.