Gladiator Circuit Should Matcmake according To Prestige or Total Hero Rating

18911131416

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    Not to mention it's justifying the reason they had to change it to begin with.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,958 ★★★★★

    Name any other game where getting a stronger account makes PVP harder and not easier. The whole point of PVP games is to build the strongest roster possible to win as many matches as possible. Kabam in their infinite wisdom decided to make a system where building a stronger roster is a disadvantage. It's really stupid.

    All you guys crying about "fair matches" refuse to get that a system where some accounts can NOT face the stronger accounts that others have to fine, for the same rewards in the same game, is NOT fair. The only "fair" matchmaking is a completely random one, which is what we're asking for.

    The real bad guy here is Kabam for putting Cavs in the same pool as Paragons. It's just so friggin stupid because it's impossible to have a mode that is "fair" to players that are so far apart. It makes zero sense.
    Why are you pointing out the obvious Captain Obvious? I literally said on that same reply that yes there is an issue that needs to be fixed just not the way you want to fix it cause doing that would to ruin it for other people who deserve to play just as much as you do.

    Right so if you actually read the second paragraph instead of malding like a child you'll notice I said that we do in fact need random matchmaking but there has to be something else that balances it a bit more so lower accounts aren't stuck in bronze for weeks.

    Yes you can't make the game mode 100% fair for both sides, no game has achieved that. What you can do, is make it so it isn't as unfair for both sides.
    I'm not arguing we shouldn't have random matchmaking, we should. However, in order for it not to punish lower level players from the get go too hard they could simply make it so you start on a different league based on your title, that way the lower accounts will eventually have to face to stronger accounts if they want to keep climbing up but they can play a bunch of matches before that happens.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    Right. People can't take out the newest Players in Bronze, and it's punishing. Lol.
  • This content has been removed.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    TyEdge said:


    Voice of the people right here
    Meaning my objectives are not for some end-goal that personally benefits my progress. I'm concerned about something that isn't self-serving. A novel concept, I know.
  • PikokPikok Member Posts: 162 ★★
    Greekhit said:

    There isn’t.
    Not a single serious game punishes account progress in competitive modes.
    It’s dumb from business perspective to do that.
    Kabam will realise it sooner or later.
    But until then this circus will go on 😠
    I believe it will not be soon. Although same situation was in AW when they promoted smaller aliances this time we got:
    1 small account benefits from situation and earn rewards which they in fair battle would not earn
    2 only early paragons which lvl characters based on prestige are screwed
    3 top paragons does not care. They are matched agains smaller account so they have advantage.
    4 rest are ok because they have matched against similar accounts

    So only small portion of player base have obvious disadvatage. So situation will change when more players will advance to such bracket and this will not be soon
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,958 ★★★★★

    Can we have people stop responding to the lone champion for the weak? this roundabout of nonsense is going nowhere.

    Doesn't matter if they stop or not cause they haven't said a single thing of substance in five days anyways. Nobody has a single counter argument as to why starting people off on different leagues based on progression and then adding random matchmaking is a bad idea.
    I'll tell you why none of you have a good counter argument lol cause none of you here are actually annoyed by the fact that smaller accounts made it to GC before a lot of Paragons last season, if that was the case you'd see no issue with these changes. Why? 1. Bigger accounts would immediately get the rewards from the lower leagues as soon as the season starts (which small accounts would have to fight for) and they'd get a head start depending on their progression, small accounts would get nothing out of it. 2. If small accounts manage to climb up the ladder quickly they'll eventually hit a brick wall and start facing bigger accounts due to matchmaking being random, this will make it harder for small accounts and easier for the bigger ones to make it to GC.
    But no, instead they all want to start in bronze with random matchmaking cause what they really want is to bulldoze smaller accounts. Any normal person with a fully functional brain and an ounce of common sense would take that head start and the free rewards, not these guys💀
  • PikokPikok Member Posts: 162 ★★

    I love all this chat but let's face it, Kabam will not change anything soon.
    They gain money over frustration, it's all over the game. You lose? use your victory shield then, they're here for that reason. You don't have VC? well buy some with your trophies, wait, you can buy only one per week but as many as you want with units, here is the link to the unit store.
    As long as player will play BG, and I'm one of those "unlucky" Paragon facing other stacked Paragon accounts, then nothing will change.

    Agree. They found perfect solution for earning money through victory shields
  • PikokPikok Member Posts: 162 ★★
    mgj0630 said:

    I only disagree with number 3. I think top paragons do care. I do at least.

    My combined prestige is 16480. In my last 6 matches I've had the following:

    16,597 (W)
    15,650 (W)
    15,911 (W)
    17,178 (W)
    16,207 (L)
    14,716 (W)

    With those last 6 fights, I'm currently in Bronze 1. So why am I putting this out there? To reiterate the point I was trying to make in another thread what seems like ages ago.

    The margin of error at the top is razor thin. The RNG of the draft can make all the difference in the world. That 17,178 account probably thought he was going to win, and 9 times out of 10, he may, but because of that 1 time, he now has to do two more matches hoping for good draft to advance.

    So my point again is that at the top, when everyone has the same champs in their deck, you're relying more on good luck in the draft to advance as much as you are skill.

    When lower accounts are fighting lower accounts, that margin is much greater, cause someone may only have 1 or 2 6*r4, that you can choose to ban, and now the luck of the draft is much less critical to your success.

    Bottom line, it's a massively flawed system, where the only appropriate solution to give everyone what they're asking for is through different BG brackets.

    In that way, the lower accounts only fight the lower accounts, albeit for lower rewards. The bigger accounts only fight the bigger accounts, so the struggle remains the same, but now those lower accounts aren't pushing higher accounts down the leader board via an easier path.
    16132 prestige. 2.8m hero rating. And my stats this season. You are not alone :)
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★

    I think it's more likely people will simply quit playing bg. I have.

    The rewards aren't close to being worth what I'd need to spend to get anywhere.

    Also I think we've confirmed in another thread that matchmaking is likely based on total hero rating which I'd say stacks up with the matches I get.

    At 2.9m I'm getting matched with people as low as 2.3 and as high as 4.2 so it's a pretty wide range

    What Bracket are you in?
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    To be clear, if you're in Gold or above, that's not unreasonable.
  • Banhammer_steBanhammer_ste Member Posts: 62
    First 2 seasons diamond 1 or 2 I think. Silver 2 last season and I haven't made it out of bronze 3 this season. 4 fights, 3 loses and I'm done with it.

    Last season I had 18 fights trying to get out of silver 2 until I quit.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    We're going to have Losses either way. Unfortunately, the way that it's structured is we need consecutive Wins to advance. Personally, I try to get to needing one more and use a Shield for good measure.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    I'm not opposed to that. I just don't want the newest Players in the competition being trampled in the first few Brackets. That's my concern. There's too much of a gap for it to even be considered fair, regardless of the status quo. People are having issues as a Paragon coming up against more advanced Paragons and justifying letting them match with UC Players in the same breath. If someone fights their way up and punches to their own ceiling, that's one thing. Making them stonewall at the beginning is another. I'd rather them limit access to BGs than see that happen for people. They'd get upset for a time, and they'd get over it. Better that than laughing at their struggles because they're fuel for others in Bronze 3
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,237 ★★★★★
    Sandbagging was an issue, regardless. If people are dumbing down their Roster to take advantage of people, that's trash.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,958 ★★★★★
    Greekhit said:

    Prestige matchmaking was always a terrible idea.
    And threads like this will go on and on.
    Mid skilled Paragons are quitting massively BGs at the moment, out of frustration.
    Most are doing only the daily objectives.
    The higher skilled Paragons that will left on next seasons, will find themselves fighting each other at low VT brackets, as happens to mid skilled Paragons now 😂😂😂
    The prays are stepping out, and the predators will gradually find themselves sweating from Bronze3.
    Then a big MCOC YouTuber will finally make a video about the unfair Prestige matchmaking, and Kabam will be pressed to change it, or change VT at all.
    None of the big YTs does it now, and I suspect that’s mainly because of two reasons:
    1. They aren’t personally affected, since most of them are highly skilled, and
    2. Even if they see the problem, they need to cater to lower accounts, since those are giving them the most views.
    That’s why they did videos about sandbagging problem, because it was affecting their main audience, lower/mid level players.
    But now silence like there is not any problem at all.
    Yet no one of the big YTs has the guts to do a video for that (apart from AlBundyRules, but his channel is still small to influence situations like this, but anyway hats off to him).
    I hope any of the “big guys” prove me wrong 🤔
    Since you're all about BGs being unfair for a specific group of players atm (which I don't disagree with) let's hear your completely unbiased solution that won't create any other issues for other players lol.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,958 ★★★★★
    mgj0630 said:

    Separate brackets for roster strengths.
    I suggested that one on another thread myself too so I agree with that one. I was asking @Greekhit though, he just complains and complains but doesn't really suggest any viable solutions.
  • CoppinCoppin Member Posts: 2,601 ★★★★★
    If the purpose of BGs was fair matches they would have given us a deck...
    Its ironic that a lot of people use the term F2P and P2W... Specially P2W and then negate the result ...also people keep on saying that BG matching is based on Prestiege... Kabam never released the parameters of the matching system.. why? Same reason that sandbagging happened.. u got people trying to exploit every aspect to benefit...
    If you are facing big rosters and even with your skills u can't beat it.. just accept it.. you hit your roof...
Sign In or Register to comment.