**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
I love this idea, but of course, they won't do that since it will hurt the revenue. [/quote]
They won't even address the suggestion.
So what would people have done before they were introduced last year?
In my honest opinion it seems like you guys want to get them out ASAP to start milking us already lol. Basically keep the rewards the same but increase the difficulty meaning we are going to have to use more resources and making this game even more pay to play. I wouldn't even be as upset with the increase in difficulty if there was a increase in rewards. Make it worth it. If the concern is that AW is too easy for top players why not also buff the rewards pretty sure the current rewards are not up to standard for top players.
You misunderstand what the whales are in this game then. They aren’t very skillful so now they can have an easier time winning just by spending. This is their way of life. They will spend. Wars will be boring if very fast. Can’t wait!
They’ve already said no. Called it a “meta change” good luck!
is there some genuine hate for that path?
Kabam never changed the game this drastically before rdt, that's why they were introduced in the first place you sad excuse for an apologist
Nope, they said it’s your fault for ranking up those champs. Don’t worry tho the “meta” is constantly changing and your garbage champ may be bot garbage in a few “iteration”!
Kabam, You guys suck. You encourage people to use resources to rank up useless champions that, quite frankly, suck as much as you do so we can win wars based on diversity. Then remove diversity in one shot. So now we're stuck with r5 4* and r3 5* that are completely useless. Then, because YOU made the change, you won't let us rank them down to get out catalysts back
Thanks for listening to your player base. Oh, wait, YOU DIDN"T LISTEN AT ALL!
Stop re-iterating generic comebacks, this is a DISCUSSION thread, meant to be back and forth, yet there is no compromise, just you infuriating more and more forum members by re-gurgitating the same bread and butter comments CONSTANTLY.
Doesn’t change those teams that will still place those high-end defenders to throw people off.
Taking away diversity is a swift kick to everyone’s lower regions, due to your superiors figuratively holding us over a barrel pushing for diversity for so long. If you are going to do this can you at least take away non-boss classes?
I need to know what to tell my BG to place
I was pointing out the fact that since their inception, people have made choices with somewhat of an expectation to get them if anything changes. However, they will make changes to their own product, and that doesn't mean they need to constantly adjust our Rosters to be on top. That contradicts a number of causes.
I accept that meta of the champions and game modes are always changing... But kabam is changing existing game functionality that people are forced to rank up garbage champions with scarce resources just to win.... Not giving out RDT seems very unreasonable. What am I going to do with my 5* r4 she hulk now.
Also I feel there is no respect to players who arrange their rank ups to meet the needs of the game in terms of AW. The team has reversed their decision about defender diversity, however we can't reverse our progress, resources and rank ups.