Witness the Great Revival! Act 6 Chapter 1 - Coming March 13th

1373840424378

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,468 ★★★★★
    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    I don't find how he can have much of a valid opinion when he's barely into Act 5 as it is. I'm also willing to bet @GroundedWisdom used 4* to get through Act 5. I'm not dissing, this just supports my argument.

    I mostly use my 5*s now. I'm still using some 4*s, just because of the high Sig and utility, like AA, Hulk, Void, etc. For the most part, I have R3 and R4 5* options now, and I'll reach for my 5*s first. I understand why it affects what people are using. I'm just less bothered by it. I go into solution mode and start thinking of what can be used instead.
    but it doesnt mean it is the best thing kabam could have done yeah?
    surely you agree they could have done something else?
    gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
    Are there other options? Most likely. Are there other options that would make it as much of a challenging gate as they intended? Perhaps not. Think of how easy it is to Max Sig a 4*, which has equal CR to a 5*. Think of the Synergies. I mean when you think about it logically, the very reasons people are upset are what would make it alot easier to get through. At least that's what I can see from a detached point of view.
    i agree with you on the part of deal with it.

    but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
    it is not ok.
    should we deal with it? yes.
    but that doesnt make it right.
    I never told anyone to think it was a good thing at all. I never said anything along the lines of good or bad. I'm looking at it with reasoning.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,468 ★★★★★
    edited March 10
    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    If they're skilled enough to take out Act 6 with 4*s, then I'm sure they're skilled enough to do it with R3 5*s. Some Synergies won't be used, fair enough. There are others that can be used with 5*s.
    They've decided to make this the gate people need to go through for Act 6. Not much can be done but look at solutions. We can't rely on 4*s indefinitely. We stopped using 3*s when Act 5 came. Actually, we stopped when we started Act 4, for the most part. If people want to make it mire challenging, try doing it with a 1/25 5*.

    you might be skilled enough to take it out with 4* CAIW, ICEMAN, AA, GR and SW for example.
    doesnt mean you cant take it out with 5* r3 HB, GAMBIT, COLOSSUS, AM, GROOT.
    so you may have the skill but if thats the best you got.
    the 4* roster there will far outshine those 5*. eveni if you ranked those 5* to r4 the 4* would still be my pick

    There are more options than the troll pulls. Lol.
    maybe, maybe not.
    that may very well be exactly how someones roster looks.
    you dont know that noone has a roster like that.
    If they're starting Act 6 and they only have the 5 worst options, that would be some curious RNG. Unless they're not playing much at all. I'm venturing the average Roster at that stage is between 30-50 5*s.
  • MaatManMaatMan Posts: 958 ★★★


    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    I don't find how he can have much of a valid opinion when he's barely into Act 5 as it is. I'm also willing to bet @GroundedWisdom used 4* to get through Act 5. I'm not dissing, this just supports my argument.

    I mostly use my 5*s now. I'm still using some 4*s, just because of the high Sig and utility, like AA, Hulk, Void, etc. For the most part, I have R3 and R4 5* options now, and I'll reach for my 5*s first. I understand why it affects what people are using. I'm just less bothered by it. I go into solution mode and start thinking of what can be used instead.
    but it doesnt mean it is the best thing kabam could have done yeah?
    surely you agree they could have done something else?
    gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
    Are there other options? Most likely. Are there other options that would make it as much of a challenging gate as they intended? Perhaps not. Think of how easy it is to Max Sig a 4*, which has equal CR to a 5*. Think of the Synergies. I mean when you think about it logically, the very reasons people are upset are what would make it alot easier to get through. At least that's what I can see from a detached point of view.
    i agree with you on the part of deal with it.

    but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
    it is not ok.
    should we deal with it? yes.
    but that doesnt make it right.
    I never told anyone to think it was a good thing at all. I never said anything along the lines of good or bad. I'm looking at it with reasoning.
    but you keep arguing against others voicing their opinions and frustrations.
    let people voice their opinions.
    let them air their frustrations.
    they are entitled to do that.
  • MaatManMaatMan Posts: 958 ★★★

    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    If they're skilled enough to take out Act 6 with 4*s, then I'm sure they're skilled enough to do it with R3 5*s. Some Synergies won't be used, fair enough. There are others that can be used with 5*s.
    They've decided to make this the gate people need to go through for Act 6. Not much can be done but look at solutions. We can't rely on 4*s indefinitely. We stopped using 3*s when Act 5 came. Actually, we stopped when we started Act 4, for the most part. If people want to make it mire challenging, try doing it with a 1/25 5*.

    you might be skilled enough to take it out with 4* CAIW, ICEMAN, AA, GR and SW for example.
    doesnt mean you cant take it out with 5* r3 HB, GAMBIT, COLOSSUS, AM, GROOT.
    so you may have the skill but if thats the best you got.
    the 4* roster there will far outshine those 5*. eveni if you ranked those 5* to r4 the 4* would still be my pick

    There are more options than the troll pulls. Lol.
    maybe, maybe not.
    that may very well be exactly how someones roster looks.
    you dont know that noone has a roster like that.
    If they're starting Act 6 and they only have the 5 worst options, that would be some curious RNG. Unless they're not playing much at all. I'm venturing the average Roster at thay stage is between 30-50 5*s.
    50 5*? i know many people wit h about 20 5* who are 100% act 5
    and maybe they have a good one or two if lucky.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,468 ★★★★★
    MaatMan said:


    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    I don't find how he can have much of a valid opinion when he's barely into Act 5 as it is. I'm also willing to bet @GroundedWisdom used 4* to get through Act 5. I'm not dissing, this just supports my argument.

    I mostly use my 5*s now. I'm still using some 4*s, just because of the high Sig and utility, like AA, Hulk, Void, etc. For the most part, I have R3 and R4 5* options now, and I'll reach for my 5*s first. I understand why it affects what people are using. I'm just less bothered by it. I go into solution mode and start thinking of what can be used instead.
    but it doesnt mean it is the best thing kabam could have done yeah?
    surely you agree they could have done something else?
    gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
    Are there other options? Most likely. Are there other options that would make it as much of a challenging gate as they intended? Perhaps not. Think of how easy it is to Max Sig a 4*, which has equal CR to a 5*. Think of the Synergies. I mean when you think about it logically, the very reasons people are upset are what would make it alot easier to get through. At least that's what I can see from a detached point of view.
    i agree with you on the part of deal with it.

    but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
    it is not ok.
    should we deal with it? yes.
    but that doesnt make it right.
    I never told anyone to think it was a good thing at all. I never said anything along the lines of good or bad. I'm looking at it with reasoning.
    but you keep arguing against others voicing their opinions and frustrations.
    let people voice their opinions.
    let them air their frustrations.
    they are entitled to do that.
    I'm not stopping anyone from speaking. I just don't have to agree with assertions like it's all just for money, or 4*s are useless, or there are no other ways to do it, or it doesn't allow for skill. I'm debating facts. Not feelings.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,468 ★★★★★
    I think you're the one being argumentative in this instance.
  • MaatManMaatMan Posts: 958 ★★★
    i also said many times its not a money grab but i aint gunna keep replying everytime someone says it.
    people will not change their opinion.
    simple

    peace out
  • GamerGamer Posts: 4,447 ★★★★
    Why not keep this for kabam and ingor @GroundedWisdom That esay to do hav a great day all
  • SnizzbarSnizzbar Posts: 1,244 ★★★★
    edited March 10
    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.
  • CFreeCFree Posts: 491 ★★
    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    The gate should just be act 5 100%
    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    The gate should just be act 5 100%

    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
  • LormifLormif Posts: 3,670 ★★★★
    So only people who agree with you get to speak?
    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:


    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    I don't find how he can have much of a valid opinion when he's barely into Act 5 as it is. I'm also willing to bet @GroundedWisdom used 4* to get through Act 5. I'm not dissing, this just supports my argument.

    I mostly use my 5*s now. I'm still using some 4*s, just because of the high Sig and utility, like AA, Hulk, Void, etc. For the most part, I have R3 and R4 5* options now, and I'll reach for my 5*s first. I understand why it affects what people are using. I'm just less bothered by it. I go into solution mode and start thinking of what can be used instead.
    but it doesnt mean it is the best thing kabam could have done yeah?
    surely you agree they could have done something else?
    gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
    Are there other options? Most likely. Are there other options that would make it as much of a challenging gate as they intended? Perhaps not. Think of how easy it is to Max Sig a 4*, which has equal CR to a 5*. Think of the Synergies. I mean when you think about it logically, the very reasons people are upset are what would make it alot easier to get through. At least that's what I can see from a detached point of view.
    i agree with you on the part of deal with it.

    but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
    it is not ok.
    should we deal with it? yes.
    but that doesnt make it right.
    I never told anyone to think it was a good thing at all. I never said anything along the lines of good or bad. I'm looking at it with reasoning.
    but you keep arguing against others voicing their opinions and frustrations.
    let people voice their opinions.
    let them air their frustrations.
    they are entitled to do that.
    I'm not stopping anyone from speaking. I just don't have to agree with assertions like it's all just for money, or 4*s are useless, or there are no other ways to do it, or it doesn't allow for skill. I'm debating facts. Not feelings.
    no but you can let them say it without replying to it all.
    you dsont have to have the last input.
    you can let someone say thier piece without saying anything against it.

    like i will be doing now.
    i will now stop replying to you. i have said my piece and that is all there is.
  • MaatManMaatMan Posts: 958 ★★★
    Lormif said:

    So only people who agree with you get to speak?

    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:


    MaatMan said:

    MaatMan said:

    I don't find how he can have much of a valid opinion when he's barely into Act 5 as it is. I'm also willing to bet @GroundedWisdom used 4* to get through Act 5. I'm not dissing, this just supports my argument.

    I mostly use my 5*s now. I'm still using some 4*s, just because of the high Sig and utility, like AA, Hulk, Void, etc. For the most part, I have R3 and R4 5* options now, and I'll reach for my 5*s first. I understand why it affects what people are using. I'm just less bothered by it. I go into solution mode and start thinking of what can be used instead.
    but it doesnt mean it is the best thing kabam could have done yeah?
    surely you agree they could have done something else?
    gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
    Are there other options? Most likely. Are there other options that would make it as much of a challenging gate as they intended? Perhaps not. Think of how easy it is to Max Sig a 4*, which has equal CR to a 5*. Think of the Synergies. I mean when you think about it logically, the very reasons people are upset are what would make it alot easier to get through. At least that's what I can see from a detached point of view.
    i agree with you on the part of deal with it.

    but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
    it is not ok.
    should we deal with it? yes.
    but that doesnt make it right.
    I never told anyone to think it was a good thing at all. I never said anything along the lines of good or bad. I'm looking at it with reasoning.
    but you keep arguing against others voicing their opinions and frustrations.
    let people voice their opinions.
    let them air their frustrations.
    they are entitled to do that.
    I'm not stopping anyone from speaking. I just don't have to agree with assertions like it's all just for money, or 4*s are useless, or there are no other ways to do it, or it doesn't allow for skill. I'm debating facts. Not feelings.
    no but you can let them say it without replying to it all.
    you dsont have to have the last input.
    you can let someone say thier piece without saying anything against it.

    like i will be doing now.
    i will now stop replying to you. i have said my piece and that is all there is.
    exact opposite of wat i have said bro.
    everyone can have thier opinion.
    simple wat i said.
  • CFreeCFree Posts: 491 ★★
    Kobster84 said:

    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    The gate should just be act 5 100%

    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
    Ya. Makes perfect sense. He actually downloaded the app based on using 4* so he should get reimbursed his data usage.
  • CFreeCFree Posts: 491 ★★
    AndiYTDE said:

    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    The gate should just be act 5 100%

    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Actually I have upgraded a 4* champion for Act 6: My 4* Thing, I even put in an awakening gem. And back then I thought it was a smart decision for several reasons:
    I will not get a 5* Thing for at least 6 months, not even speaking of awakening him.
    In Act 5 Chapter 4, there were some bosses that were a lot easier with champions released a couple of months before Act 5.4, like Mephisto (Blade) and Ultron (Medusa). So I figured they´d follow the same pattern and make a boss my 4* Thing would help me a lot with.
    He´s an amazing champion who can save your butt if you mess up once, and his fury stacks generate an outstanding attack rating the longer the fight goes.

    This is not why I hate the champion restrictions, there are many other reasons for that. I also do not demand RDT as well, but I just wanted to let you know that there are some people who have upgraded their 4* champions specifically for Act 6, myself included.
    Right. So you ranked him for reasons other than Act 6.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    The gate should just be act 5 100%

    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
    Ya. Makes perfect sense. He actually downloaded the app based on using 4* so he should get reimbursed his data usage.
    It’s like your purposely avoiding the point if the restriction hadn’t been announced 1 week before the release people may have used resources on mediocre 5* instead
  • CFreeCFree Posts: 491 ★★
    Kobster84 said:

    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    CFree said:

    Kobster84 said:

    The gate should just be act 5 100%

    CFree said:

    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
    Ya. Makes perfect sense. He actually downloaded the app based on using 4* so he should get reimbursed his data usage.
    It’s like your purposely avoiding the point if the restriction hadn’t been announced 1 week before the release people may have used resources on mediocre 5* instead
    And you just made my point that it was announced prior to the release so what you did last month or last year is irrelevant. You want to use 4*, fine. But don’t pretend you ranked them because of Act 6.
  • Dead1Dead1 Posts: 182
    Oh kabam, my exam in 13th march
Sign In or Register to comment.