Ingjust Banning: Seeking Clarity and Fairness from Kabam

2456

Comments

  • edited November 2023
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,016 ★★★★★

    I can't even know if is this the problem because they don't say a word!

    They obviously said something or you know something because you said in your OP that it was for use of 3rd party software.
  • RonSwansonRonSwanson Member Posts: 1,171 ★★★★

    I can't even know if is this the problem because they don't say a word!

    They obviously said something or you know something because you said in your OP that it was for use of 3rd party software.
    Already changing his story lol. These guys out themselves sooner or later
  • obsidimanobsidiman Member Posts: 974 ★★★
    Milan1405 said:

    I am seriously considering involving consumer associations to assert my rights.

    You don't have any rights. The ToS states pretty clearly, even in legal jargon, that you don't own your account. Spending money, creating an account or anything to the sort doesn't matter.
    You know it doesn't actually matter what the TOS says for a lot of video games, within reason. If you've spent money on a game, you actually can sue them if it is determined that they wrongly banned you. For example, many companies (e.g. gaming) say in the TOS you agree to, that you cannot file a class action lawsuit against them, it must be individual claims. But guess what? People have done exactly that and won lol.
    Oh my gosh yes! Please encourage this! Then please please oh pretty please keep us all apprised of the ongoing proceedings and outcome.

    The spirit of Golivaez lives on strongly!
  • Vegeta9001Vegeta9001 Member Posts: 1,708 ★★★★★
    edited November 2023
    They surely can't outright refuse you a reason as to why you were banned. There has been games in the past that have had class actions against them for wrongfully banning people that spent money in their product. Even console providers have been dragged into stuff like that for wrongfully console banning people due to flaws in their system.

    Reading through the thread, I'm more so on the fence of you've been caught doing stuff you shouldn't have, but above point does still stand.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,016 ★★★★★
    Milan1405 said:

    I am seriously considering involving consumer associations to assert my rights.

    You don't have any rights. The ToS states pretty clearly, even in legal jargon, that you don't own your account. Spending money, creating an account or anything to the sort doesn't matter.
    You know it doesn't actually matter what the TOS says for a lot of video games, within reason. If you've spent money on a game, you actually can sue them if it is determined that they wrongly banned you. For example, many companies (e.g. gaming) say in the TOS you agree to, that you cannot file a class action lawsuit against them, it must be individual claims. But guess what? People have done exactly that and won lol.

    It's all very confusing and actually, legally, very interesting. I think it's because even though you agree to the TOS of a game, judges can rule that they are actually unfair or invalid terms and rule in favour of the consumer. Such as games advertising one thing and then giving you another. Regardless of what you agree to in the TOS, you can still sue them, and you can win. It would be incredibly unfair for example if a person working for a company did not like a certain player who had spent a lot of money in that game and chose to ban them. That's why the TOS wouldn't matter in that case, at least in the US and Europe, I don't really have knowledge about the precedent in other countries.

    Ofc 99% of the time this does not happen. 99% it's cheaters who do not want to admit to cheating. Like I said before, I think Kabam as a company are pretty accurate at detecting cheating, so I am highly doubtful of this guy's story.
    Can you cite a case where that's happened?
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,647 Guardian
    Milan1405 said:

    You know it doesn't actually matter what the TOS says for a lot of video games, within reason. If you've spent money on a game, you actually can sue them if it is determined that they wrongly banned you. For example, many companies (e.g. gaming) say in the TOS you agree to, that you cannot file a class action lawsuit against them, it must be individual claims. But guess what? People have done exactly that and won lol.

    In the US, you can sue anyone for any reason. However, and this is something I specifically track, to the best of my knowledge no individual player has ever reversed a ban for an online game in any western country (it has happened in China). I don't know why people think this is a thing that happens, but as far as I am aware this is a Mandela effect.

    Under US law, even if you could get a ban reversed on the grounds that the cause of the ban was in error, any competent lawyer would tell you this would be a meaningless victory. The company could simply ban you the next day under the doctrine that they can ban anyone for any reason, and they decided to ban you at their discretion. There is no way to compel an online game to maintain your account.

    You could sue them to refund your money, but you'd generally have to prove fraud which is difficult to do. You'd have to show you didn't receive what you paid for, and shutting down your account is not the same thing as demonstrating you did not receive what you paid for. As far as I am aware, once again no one in a western country has managed to sue for refund of their online expenditures on the grounds that banning the account deprives them of their property (there have been cases where underaged players have managed to recover expenditures from banned accounts on the grounds that they were legally unable to agree to the terms of service).

    I know of no case where a group of players filed a class action lawsuit against an online game operator to attempt to reverse banning and won. I am aware of a couple class action suits filed against online gaming companies accusing them of fraud or other crimes. The Roblox one comes to mind. In that case, Roblox was accused of, among other things, explicitly executing a fraud whereby objectionable content was allowed onto the platform to generate revenue and then deleted after significant revenue was paid, citing moderation policies, and then not refunding the money. The fraud was knowingly taking money for purchases the platform knew it would not allow the players to actually keep for any length of time. The TOS would not apply in this case, because if it could be proven, this would be a statutory crime, and TOS agreements cannot decriminalize statutory violations in that way. In other words, you cannot legally agree to a contract that stipulates or requires illegal behavior.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,647 Guardian
    In my time playing this game, three separate players have asserted they would take legal action against Kabam and would explicitly keep me updated on that process, essentially to "prove" to me that they were legally in the right. Two were claims they would sue the company, one claimed they would initiate a complaint in the EU regarding certain protection laws. In all three cases after about a day or two, I never heard from them again.

    I honestly would like to see someone get farther, even though as I said competent legal counsel would probably advise against this course of action, because I would like a good example to point to as to what the likely eventual resolution of such an attempt would be. Give me a link to a court filing, give me a LexisNexis entry, give me something.
  • obsidimanobsidiman Member Posts: 974 ★★★
    DNA3000 said:

    In my time playing this game, three separate players have asserted they would take legal action against Kabam and would explicitly keep me updated on that process, essentially to "prove" to me that they were legally in the right. Two were claims they would sue the company, one claimed they would initiate a complaint in the EU regarding certain protection laws. In all three cases after about a day or two, I never heard from them again.

    I honestly would like to see someone get farther, even though as I said competent legal counsel would probably advise against this course of action, because I would like a good example to point to as to what the likely eventual resolution of such an attempt would be. Give me a link to a court filing, give me a LexisNexis entry, give me something.

    Just promise to keep the rest of us informed. Change names as needed. But I too want someone to follow through and hear about the results.
  • startropicsstartropics Member Posts: 874 ★★★★

    I feel defamed by Kabam, as they are accusing me of misconduct without any basis. How is it possible that I am banned for 7 days without adequate explanation? As a player who financially contributes to the game, I expect fair and transparent treatment. I am seriously considering involving consumer associations to assert my rights. I hope that this issue can be resolved fairly and promptly.

    kabam are the judge and jury and only take action if they're very confident that there was a violation.
  • Milan1405Milan1405 Member Posts: 952 ★★★★
    edited November 2023
    DNA3000 said:

    Milan1405 said:

    You know it doesn't actually matter what the TOS says for a lot of video games, within reason. If you've spent money on a game, you actually can sue them if it is determined that they wrongly banned you. For example, many companies (e.g. gaming) say in the TOS you agree to, that you cannot file a class action lawsuit against them, it must be individual claims. But guess what? People have done exactly that and won lol.

    In the US, you can sue anyone for any reason. However, and this is something I specifically track, to the best of my knowledge no individual player has ever reversed a ban for an online game in any western country (it has happened in China). I don't know why people think this is a thing that happens, but as far as I am aware this is a Mandela effect.

    Under US law, even if you could get a ban reversed on the grounds that the cause of the ban was in error, any competent lawyer would tell you this would be a meaningless victory. The company could simply ban you the next day under the doctrine that they can ban anyone for any reason, and they decided to ban you at their discretion. There is no way to compel an online game to maintain your account.

    You could sue them to refund your money, but you'd generally have to prove fraud which is difficult to do. You'd have to show you didn't receive what you paid for, and shutting down your account is not the same thing as demonstrating you did not receive what you paid for. As far as I am aware, once again no one in a western country has managed to sue for refund of their online expenditures on the grounds that banning the account deprives them of their property (there have been cases where underaged players have managed to recover expenditures from banned accounts on the grounds that they were legally unable to agree to the terms of service).

    I know of no case where a group of players filed a class action lawsuit against an online game operator to attempt to reverse banning and won. I am aware of a couple class action suits filed against online gaming companies accusing them of fraud or other crimes. The Roblox one comes to mind. In that case, Roblox was accused of, among other things, explicitly executing a fraud whereby objectionable content was allowed onto the platform to generate revenue and then deleted after significant revenue was paid, citing moderation policies, and then not refunding the money. The fraud was knowingly taking money for purchases the platform knew it would not allow the players to actually keep for any length of time. The TOS would not apply in this case, because if it could be proven, this would be a statutory crime, and TOS agreements cannot decriminalize statutory violations in that way. In other words, you cannot legally agree to a contract that stipulates or requires illegal behavior.
    I didn't mean sue them for an arbitrary sum for banning you, I meant just to recover the money you have put in to the game. Sorry for not making that clear. Obviously, only people who spend a very significant sum on a game would be incentivised to sue said gaming company (legal fees etc). And the number of people who have been banned from and spent a very significant amount on a game is an exceedingly small amount of people, so naturally it would be rare.

    Also I think when I read about the class action lawsuits or cases of people suing and winning it was not for this type of game. It was a while ago but I believe it was when gaming companies have external moderators. Obviously Kabam (wisely) does not have this. Obviously roblox and cryptogames are classic examples where TOS of a game are invalidated by criminal activity which is a whole separate issue I believe.

    I don't know the intricate details obviously, and I don't know whether it's on the company to prove the person was breaking the TOS or if the customer has to prove they did not break TOS, which would be very messy (probably could depend on the judge you get.)

    As I said earlier, there are probably no existing case studies so to speak for a game like this one, as no high spender has ever been illegitimately banned to my knowledge and also kabam are an honest company I believe, unlike the dodgy internet games out there, or ones with external moderation. I did have a quick look on the internet and saw some people asking the question on legal sites and the lawyer answered them saying you can, but idk how practical/expensive this would be. As you said, there seems to be no one who has written up their experience.

    Lastly, I think gaming companies can offer a settlement to a player and as part of the deal, require for them not to talk about it. Maybe this is part of the reason information seems lacking on the net? Someone did sue Riot games and win, but I believe that was in South America and have no idea what the court system is like in countries like Brazil.
  • klobberintymeklobberintyme Member Posts: 1,575 ★★★★
    Hold on, I got a hold of a supervisor. This is what they relayed:




    Also, anyone who wants to sue kabam, feel free, starting costs are $10k and however long it takes to get to court where you run the risk of getting it tossed immediately.
  • startropicsstartropics Member Posts: 874 ★★★★

    I am seriously considering involving consumer associations to assert my rights.

  • startropicsstartropics Member Posts: 874 ★★★★
    no ragging on op, just got reminded of that clip
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,543 ★★★★★

    I was one of the false bans for using Quake in AW in 2018, so let me tell you from experience that no one here cares. People that are on the forums all the time typically lean in favor of Kabam. I don’t know if you’re guilty or innocent so I won’t make any assumptions. Either call it quits if you feel unfairly treated, or just keep playing as normal. Nothing will make Kabam budge.

    Yes because that is an exact 1:1 scenario and definitely makes sense to compare
  • ReignkingTWReignkingTW Member Posts: 2,774 ★★★★★
    DNA3000 said:

    I was one of the false bans for using Quake in AW in 2018, so let me tell you from experience that no one here cares. People that are on the forums all the time typically lean in favor of Kabam. I don’t know if you’re guilty or innocent so I won’t make any assumptions. Either call it quits if you feel unfairly treated, or just keep playing as normal. Nothing will make Kabam budge.

    I got another player's ban reversed by demonstrating the ban was in error. If there is some substantive reason to believe a player has been banned in error, I would at least try to see if there was anything that could be done. However, most of the time the only evidence people present that a ban was in error is testimonial. They claim they did nothing wrong. Very few people will care about those claims, rightly so, because the vast overwhelming majority of the I did nothing wrong crowd did a lot wrong and are just trying to gaslight the community.

    The Quake related bans from five or six years ago were definitely detection errors, and I hope you were eventually compensated for those if you were one of the players caught in that particular net and did nothing else wrong.
    How can you prove you don't have or didn't use 3rd party software?
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,566 ★★★★★

    Hey everybody,

    Our detection methods are always getting better, and are in a great place right now, but we have made mistakes before. It's why we check these reports, and in this case, there was an error that resulted in a false flag

    When we respond to others on the forums to verify they should be banned, it's because we've done the due diligence to check on the ban criteria, and in this case, we were wrong. OP, we are very sorry for this mistake.

    Thanks for the clarification Miike. The fact is, the amount of false cases are very few and far between.
  • bm3eppsbm3epps Member Posts: 1,157 ★★★
    edited November 2023
    ....
Sign In or Register to comment.