Passing up 10% t5cc side objective this month *shrugs* “oh well I guess haha”....anyone else?

NewlinstheoryNewlinstheory Member Posts: 1,012 ★★★★
edited February 2021 in General Discussion
One of the worst objectives has made a return haha, and Im still at place where I am choosing not to rank up 4* because I cant use 4* as AW def placement, not taking them in AQ, or Act 7 (even though I 100% it already lol)
I mean it’s unfortunate that this objective couldn’t be a selector at least, because with the difficulty, its still just does not feel rewarding for the effort put into the objective, also with the new buffs for cav quests, it also feels a bit more tedious than it did before(imo, some of y’all could think otherwise and thats fine haha)

Idk like I said for the objectives involving a team of 4* or below for the EQ, they should be selectors, for others that just say “beat legendary side quest 20-30” times should be the crystal 🤷🏽🤷🏽....maybe next month haha


Anyone else gonna be skipping this objective or gonna be pushing for it?
«134567…10

Comments

  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,329 ★★★★★
    It’s pretty alright.



    Brought Yondu in for the Tech one.
  • NewlinstheoryNewlinstheory Member Posts: 1,012 ★★★★
    No_oneuk said:

    i like it - it makes the event quest more fun since it's far too easy normally - 4* restriction actually makes you plan and think which is nice.

    For a wider roster of r4-r5 4* yeah I could see that, I have 30 that are mixed with r4-r5 4 star champs, so Im kind just like “ehhhh this objective isn’t for me this time” haha
    HI_guys said:

    I actually like the 4* challenge. Much better than last months grindy one

    For the last 4* objective we had Id agree, the old cav class buff made it manageable, for the new one Id need to rank up champs I have at r1 lol
  • NewlinstheoryNewlinstheory Member Posts: 1,012 ★★★★
    Etjama said:

    Yup, I barely have any 4*s ranked up cause Kabam won't let me use them in Act 6. Now they suddenly want me to use 4*s? I don't even think my 4* roster could do it without excessive item use. And I can't afford to take them up at this point because I never have enough iso.

    Same situation haha, I could try to do it, but have a feeling Id need to use resources I dont wanna use just for a 10% crystal haha
  • SkyLord7000SkyLord7000 Member Posts: 4,000 ★★★★★
    Might do it. Been bored with content lately and don’t wanna grind abyss
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 4,439 ★★★★★
    They need to give us rank up gems for 4*’s. Nobody’s going to rank anything less than a 5*
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,534 ★★★★★
    Personally I've never sworn off Ranking anything. Always something to work on towards Level-Up, S.A., or overall progress.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,534 ★★★★★
    HI_guys said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    Personally I've never sworn off Ranking anything. Always something to work on towards Level-Up, S.A., or overall progress.

    4* from epoch gonna come in handy now
    Not really. I have no shortage. Lol.
  • PyrdaPyrda Member Posts: 255 ★★
    Change this to 10 sigs per level and it’s more motivating but so no way it’s worth the effort
  • MasterpuffMasterpuff Member Posts: 6,469 ★★★★★
    arsjum said:

    One of my favorite objectives. Your disagrees are welcome!

    The only problem is a ranked 4*s for the last set of nodes. And i cant spare the resources to rank more. Now we are running map 7 so its less conpeelong.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,534 ★★★★★
    KnightZero said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    GagoH said:

    They need to give us rank up gems for 4*’s. Nobody’s going to rank anything less than a 5*

    That's the problem. People are too set in their ways about Ranking 4*s. Which started around the time 6*s came about. They keep saying they have no use for them, even when they have a use for them. Up to them, but they're missing out on Rewards.
    With the amount of resources it takes to rank up a 4* and the amount of resources it takes to rank up a 5* or 6*, why would you spend so much on a 4*? Its not about being 'set in our ways'. It's just a lot of resources to use.
    Actually it is about being set in our ways. Resources come and go, and no one told people to swear off Ranking 4*s. That's not by design, that's by choice. Nor do you really use anything of great significance for a 4* that you use for a 6*. It's just stubbornness, to be totally honest. Between 6*s being added and 4*s being banned from Act 6, people can't be bothered. Even when they introduce something to make use of them, some refuse to Rank them. The game isn't making that decision for them.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,534 ★★★★★
    TitoBandito187 said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    GagoH said:

    They need to give us rank up gems for 4*’s. Nobody’s going to rank anything less than a 5*

    That's the problem. People are too set in their ways about Ranking 4*s. Which started around the time 6*s came about. They keep saying they have no use for them, even when they have a use for them. Up to them, but they're missing out on Rewards.
    How many times have you done this side event with all 4*?

    Just answer that please.
    Is that what we're taking about? No. We're talking about people refusing to Rank 4*s.
Sign In or Register to comment.