Potential Delay to v44.1 Launch
We are currently working through some issues that may affect the release window of v44.1. This means that the update may not release on Monday as it usually does. We are working to resolve the issue holding us up as quickly as possible, but will keep you all updated, especially if the delay results in any changes to the content release schedule.
We are currently working through some issues that may affect the release window of v44.1. This means that the update may not release on Monday as it usually does. We are working to resolve the issue holding us up as quickly as possible, but will keep you all updated, especially if the delay results in any changes to the content release schedule.
Options
Comments
As a user, I would prefer a content delay instead of this not- functional release ...
Why the heck doesn’t Kabam test issues? this is nuts.
Just like with my job, I can't compare what software we work on to what Kabam does. I can understand where they are coming from though.
And you wouldn't be screwed because, like my job, banking has back methods if software goes down. You're just trying to be dramatic.
Let me know when you get some experience with Unity or anything much closer to working on mobile games.
I am hoping in the next few days when the app force an update, this old work horse can still run the course.
For the Android phone, it will be auto-fight only.
2. Pretty much everything you’ve ever worked on has probably been modularized monolithic software. That’s where stuff like unit testing and integration testing can sometimes make sense. In game development (for this kind of game) this generally has no application, because there are no units and there is minimal integration.
There’s a lot of different software development models and expertise on one doesn’t translate to the others. Games like this are developed with non-abstracted layering. No one can just transplant their modules from one engine to another, nor can they reasonably test different modules without the others. When you ignore the kind of development or aren’t even aware of it, you get weird mismatched suggestions. Your suggestions are comparable to someone saying the developers should use a better inheritance model for champions. No matter how many years of C++ programming someone has, that suggestion would be no less weird. It might make sense if champions were C++ objects or classes, but they aren’t and nobody would make them that way (because that would break the development model everyone uses).
It isn't possible to parry champs that will lunge in.