**WE ARE NO LONGER Temporarily Reverting Tier 1 War Ban System**
After further discussion, the game team has made the decision not make adjustements to the ban system.
The previously proposed fix would have resolved the issue for Summoners who are on the cusp of T1/T2 play, and negatively impacted Alliances more securely in T1. Instead, we recommend that cusp Alliances switch to Manual Placement to your members to place the allotted 5 Ban Champions limit there.
Apologies for the back and forth, and for any confusion.
After further discussion, the game team has made the decision not make adjustements to the ban system.
The previously proposed fix would have resolved the issue for Summoners who are on the cusp of T1/T2 play, and negatively impacted Alliances more securely in T1. Instead, we recommend that cusp Alliances switch to Manual Placement to your members to place the allotted 5 Ban Champions limit there.
Apologies for the back and forth, and for any confusion.
Options
Comments
Wow, wasn't aware act 7 and 2 volumes of Carinas didn't exist yet.
I didn't mention them because they're permanent content. Alliances aren't permanent for all players. Some don't make the cut. SOP and Gauntlet aren't permanent either. Nor is the final offer of act 7
. That's the point I was making and again you're overlooking it completely
Y'all said there's no path, there is an obvious one. The you move the goal posts again.
People are within their rights to criticize poor business practices and praise better ones. There are a bunch of Stans on this forum saying “you all complained about TB just the same.” When we identified specific differences between the situations, you fall back on “there’s no rule against it.”
You got anywhere else you wanna move those goalposts?
You can advocate for whatever you want, and you can criticize whatever you want. But there is no goal for goal posts to mark. You don't get to define a finish line such that if you cross it you get to have what you want. If you don't like the Paragon requirements, that's fine. But if you want to make some objective argument that they are somehow wrong, you need to argue within the context of both general good game design principles, and the specifics of how this game functions. To be clear, you aren't required to learn either to provide feedback. But if you believe such things don't even exist, then your feedback falls under the category of "you want what you want" and that's all. The rest of it is just details juggling.
No one is "falling back" on anything. The people claiming that Paragon is different from Thronebreaker because of a very specific set of conditions are themselves attempting to invoke such a rule, when they claim those differences are meaningful. It is simply stating a fact that there is no such rule being broken, and therefore those differences are really distinctions without a meaningful difference.
It seems the rule of 3 was set then mental gymnastics were applied on how to justify it based on previous content. Honestly the fix here is easy, Eternity of Pain’s content and Paragon objectives should be permanent content available to all after achieving the title. Remove the concerns of a “paywall” and this isn’t an issue.
1.) Increase your roster depth by purchasing 6* Nexuses.
2.) Strengthen your roster with R3 materials and 6* sig stones.
3.) Get crumbs of R4 materials for Paragon with a premium cost.
So, yea choose your priority.
Dr. Zola