**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Otherwise the next offseason war won’t happen
Convince everybody to stop spending for month , let s see how they ignore community then.
Good points and reasoning are completely ignored.
They instantly teleport instead when it comes to be petty.
Preseason Matchmaking/Wars has resumed.
Targeting Aug 16 to start the actual Season 43.
So will be just 1 war short of 2 weeks of Preseason to try things out.
It seems like it’s going to be a big mess for casual alliances that had different people join every war. I haven’t seen anything from Kabam explaining how they intended this to help 1/2 BG alliances.
If ally ran 1 BG war, anyone who placed defense in BG's 2/3 were able to instead join BG1 as Attack only (provided there was attack slots open), and their 2/3 defenders were “discarded” for that war (but still “locked” out of being able to use for AQ because they were still “Persistent Defenders”, even though in a BG that was beyond what the Ally was enlisted run for wars).
Insightful that it depends if there are multiple people at that node, or just single person.
(don’t know if I saw it explained that way for similar AQ issue, which I think was just if looking at different BG, akin to in AW looking at your defense map since it is not your own offense map your looking at)
offensive map works fine with info/poke
Is it OK no matter which BG offense you look at ?
hope they fix this before the season launches
@Kabam Miike mate, please take a look into this
its not just like that place a defender on a spot without analysing these things when coming to WIN Focus
If we cannot remove a player from alliance war once they placed heroes at least let leaders be able to move the players within the 3 battle groups .
So I have persistent placement - I added my defenders to BG 2, a couple weeks ago (placing them three times you know the drill)
But now I'm "assigned" BG 1 (attack only?) and it tells me to "join" or "continue" depending on which BG, and when I actually go to join attack, I get the lovely error message many of us are getting. Can anyone make sense of this?
This has to be the worst implemented mode change we've had in a really long time. Hopefully we get some adjustments and clarification before an actual season starts.
(**first, for reference..)
When going to Setup Defense screens, if you are already placed in say BG2 (like you seem to be), you still will see it say Join for BG 1/3, and Continue for BG2. That indicates you are already placed persistent defense in BG2.
Now, clicking JOIN on either BG 1/3 (we are still in the Setup Persistent Defense area), that will have the effect of REMOVING your defenders from BG2, and allowing you to continue to put them in BG 1/3 instead (starting from scratch though, just can’t “move” them all over with single click)
(**so, now onto joining ATTACK..)
The Join/Continue/Join you see in Attack screens is probably piggy-backing off of the same situation as above.
First, the “Assigned” is nothing more that leadership's wish for you to join a certain group. Doesn’t actually indicate you “have to” or are “committed to” joining that BG.
BUT, the JOIN option on BG 1/3 seems to be something that still needs to be flushed out in the new system.
?? Will they allow someone who placed defense in BG2 to then change their mind and join Attack in BG1 ?? (For Ally’s that only run 1 or 2 BG's, that is what you can do if you had placed your defense in BG3, since BG3 isn’t being run, you can join BG1 on attack)
?? Or does Kabam want to require you to stick to your defense-placed BG for Attack too ? Maybe this is why this ERROR message is coming up. Maybe you can’t do that (with the exception I mentioned above if a higher BG isn’t actually enlisted and used, even though you can set defense in those higher BG #’s)
But I have noticed @SummonerNR responds to just about everything. And also that he/she tags Kabam Mike and another for some type of list. Are these the official Kabam responses we've been looking for? NR seems to have some kind of inside track of what's happening. What exactly is going on? It's extremely frustrating to not have any kind of input from Kabam about such a large part of the contest.
Kabam should still be the ones providing most of their information to us and as usual they mostly don't.
(I know, the forums are mainly for us to communicate amongst ourselves and aren't a direct line of communication with Kabam, blah blah blah. Changes this big should have plenty of info provided to us and we should be able to get questions answered when there's confusion and things inevitably go wrong and the forum seems a logical spot for that to happen. We are just being ignored the same as all the threads asking for info on what they are doing about all the 6/7* champs and other rewards that supposedly weren't removed from the mythic crystal fiasco when they promised they would be. No one was asking for account specific info, just info on what they will do to complete the removal they promised they would do.)
I edited the message because one of the words was wrong.
The entire message entered in "moderation" expecting approval from a mod.
After 24 hours my message is not visible.