Sieger7999 ★
Reactions
Comments
-
I can see at least one very top alliance has been taken out of the leader board
-
This work around works: https://twitter.com/tomwarren/status/1281567708895739905/video/1
-
There is an easy fix for this, why can’t they just send the nexus crystal as an in an in game message after you 100% the abyss. That way people can open their other rewards and make a more informed decision
-
I would say exploration of Act 6 is far longer.
-
That’s a good point, most of the mixed bg alliances are running a combo of 5/6 so this would solve the majority of issues in relation to that
-
Exactly this, instead of wasting your development time on a ticketing system, spend it on things that players actually want. I am still shaking my head with how proud they were with incursions and how long it took for them to develop instead of the many many other possibilities. This has the added benefit (For kabam) of…
-
iPhone XS Max 13.4.1
-
Looks like it is an iOS issue, not MCOC. I have the same issue with games like Pokémon go
-
Same iPhone XS max
-
Only people that have been invited to the last 3 betas in our alliance have been the guys that are in the US and there are 5 of them in our ally, might be random but that is weird rng if that is the case
-
I could appreciate that side if things but what annoyed me was not being able to use 6* in the 5* gate requirements, for example if they were asking for 4 5* science it should really have been 5 or 6* science
-
The gates were a horrible and lazy design, 6.3 is far more enjoyable to play yet at the same time very challenging.
-
Will that chance to evade be the same broken logic used in LOL where champs that have abilities to stop being evaded are still evadable?
-
Yeah the only hope is they release a synergy champ for her to get around it
-
This is how I have read it as well, which is pretty disappointing
-
As above, if you evade the 3rd beam you avoid the degen. Obviously it is best to evade all 3 beams, but definitely focus on that 3rd one
-
No he tanks the entire sp3 regardless of how many hits
-
As stated many, many times in this thread they explicitly said that these tweaks would be announced prior to the champ being added to the general pool, for cull this rule was broken. So yes, without a sliver of doubt they broke their own word with the cull announcement and honestly not sure how you weren’t aware of this?…
-
If they don’t move ahead with any tweaks on namor, but move ahead with tweaks on cull I will be a) pleasantly suprised (as I have both at a high rank but never used cull after the initial excitement of getting him in a paid crystal) and b) very confused as namor if a much better champ and goes against people’s arguments…
-
And the reason players are doing this is because Kabam broke their own rules in regards to when the announcement would be made about champs with cull. I Understand that the player can be overly jittery sometimes but in this case I think we have every right to be and only because of the delayed cull announcement , this for…
-
The elephant in the room in the lack of an announcement on Namor, is it acceptable if the tweak is announced later? The cynical view (which I share) is that they get the best of both worlds, they can openly over power champs (the excuse that they couldn’t of picked up culls damage in testing is not an acceptable test, nor…
-
They also said if they weren’t going to change a character there would be no announcement, I believe they said that when mentioning that no change would be made to Robin. So by all logic that has been given by Kabam, Namor will not be changed
-
Agreed I think everyone grasped culls limitations fairly early on stopping a lot of people going all out on upgrading him (which is why I find it strange they need to tweak him in the first place), but that is not the same with namor
-
Although I agree that if they did it to cull they will do it to Namor, what i can’t accept is that they didn’t know this when they released him, to excuse this would be to accept a level of incompetence we know just isn’t possible.
-
Geez, want some chips to go with all that salt?
-
I will most likely subscribe to this but I do think the inventory increase shouldn’t be behind a paywall, the other stuff I can live with but think that the inventory increase is a bit rude to hide behind a paywall
-
I think loyalty shouldn’t be a donation, it should auto accrue in the treasury based off how long each member has been part of the ally. So it would ramp up something like this: Each week your treasury will get x amount per summoner depending on how long they have been a member: <=2 weeks - 0 loyalty 2-4 weeks - 5000 4-8…
-
I generally agree with that, with the exception being the recently revamped champs like venom (who is now in my top 5 champs) and sg.
-
No, it made no mention of how many frags were in each crystal in the message
-
Yeah, I was kind of hoping Kabam would be proactive in making this right but that doesn’t seem to be likely