Best class in the game right now?

WetHam

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Stone3x

Science because luke cage is the 🐐

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

Terminatrix

Science

WetHam said:

because.....Photon 🙂💚

Dubois

It's tied between Cosmic and Sciencd imo

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

Grub88

Skill

The more votes there are for science the better skill actually looks

There are so many top tier skill champs its crazy I am the only vote for this class

Defence: Korg, Killmonger, Mantis, Bullseye, NF
Burst Attack: Mantis, Kate, Shang Chi, Black Cat
Long form content: Kate, Aegon
Incursions: Bullseye, Aegon
All rounders: Kingpin, Zemo

Not to mention the countless miss/evade counters and cleanse champs plus there are a heap with bleed which they get a boost from deep wounds

I will note that skill is lacking in the 7* pool but I don't think that was the question

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Grub88

Skill

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

You mean Penny

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Not really, my r5 ascended kills any r5 or r2 in a single sp2, even if Gladiator is slightly quicker for certain matchups like Red Skull (which he is) the difference isn't big enough to put him above Galan because Gladiator is completely and utterly useless on defense.

Ultragamer

Science

Grub88 said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

You mean Penny

Her and red skull two of the ones I mean. While I’ve taken fam, fury, and domino

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Not really, my r5 ascended kills any r5 or r2 in a single sp2, even if Gladiator is slightly quicker for certain matchups like Red Skull (which he is) the difference isn't big enough to put him above Galan because Gladiator is completely and utterly useless on defense.

You act like Galan is a op defender he’s worse than herc unless it’s a bad match up they aren’t losing

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Not really, my r5 ascended kills any r5 or r2 in a single sp2, even if Gladiator is slightly quicker for certain matchups like Red Skull (which he is) the difference isn't big enough to put him above Galan because Gladiator is completely and utterly useless on defense.

You act like Galan is a op defender he’s worse than herc unless it’s a bad match up they aren’t losing

If they don't draft a nuke or a direct counter they always lose enough health for you to win. If you place Gladiator on defense it's a guaranteed loss for you cause he's absolutely useless with or without counters.

Ultragamer

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Not really, my r5 ascended kills any r5 or r2 in a single sp2, even if Gladiator is slightly quicker for certain matchups like Red Skull (which he is) the difference isn't big enough to put him above Galan because Gladiator is completely and utterly useless on defense.

You act like Galan is a op defender he’s worse than herc unless it’s a bad match up they aren’t losing

If they don't draft a nuke or a direct counter they always lose enough health for you to win. If you place Gladiator on defense it's a guaranteed loss for you cause he's absolutely useless with or without counters.

I’ve used slower champs to take out Galan he’s not hard you can easily manage his charges

Ultragamer

Science

Plus a lot of meta attackers crush him he’s outdated defense

ItsClobberinTime

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Gladiator? Adam? Vox? Hulkling? Herc? Cgr? These are all better than him

Gladiator and Vox are not better lol I have all three, you're absolutely delusional if you think they are. Maybe as 7* but not as 6*, as 6* not only are they not faster than Galan (same speed), neither of them are dual threat, Galan is.
As for Adam, he can't take some of the problematic matchups Galan take, I have a r5 ascended sig 200 Adam.

I’ve got 45 sec rol take downs with gladiator don’t see galan doing that?

450k healthpool = 250k healthpool?

My r3 7* Mantis can't take out WS in 45 secs yet she's an absolute nuke in BGs and she's considered one of the best 7* skill champs for r3. You're trying to argue something that doesn't make sense here, there's a difference between BGs sized healthpools and big healthpools. I rank champs based on how well they perform in BGs so that's why personally I still think Galan is top 5.

You can get quick bg fights with gladiator galan kinda slow if it isn’t one of his key matches

Not really, my r5 ascended kills any r5 or r2 in a single sp2, even if Gladiator is slightly quicker for certain matchups like Red Skull (which he is) the difference isn't big enough to put him above Galan because Gladiator is completely and utterly useless on defense.

You act like Galan is a op defender he’s worse than herc unless it’s a bad match up they aren’t losing

If they don't draft a nuke or a direct counter they always lose enough health for you to win. If you place Gladiator on defense it's a guaranteed loss for you cause he's absolutely useless with or without counters.

I’ve used slower champs to take out Galan he’s not hard you can easily manage his charges

Good for you, I have him in my deck and he gets me wins nonetheless from time to time. You also have multiple people disagreeing with you on this same thread, I don't. Just agree to disagree and move on lol.

FrostGiantLord

Science has a lot of champs with great utility and damage, but my favorite is definitely Cosmic. They have tons of insane nukes and lots of champs which are a lot of fun to play. I also have a 6* Ascended Herc, so there may be some bias here 😂

Jack2634

Science

mainly because 7 star cosmic is absolute azz, while science's 7 star champions pool is ridiculously broken.

But my personal favorite class is skill. It has some of the most relevant and annoying defenders (NF, Korg, KM, bulls, attuma) while also having mix of utilities and high damage attacker (KP, Kate, Massacre, mantis,shang...)

Pikolu

Cosmic

Sersi is carrying the whole class to victory

Toyota_2015

Science

Science is the best at consistently good characters

Rayven5220

Science

No doubt about it.

Cosmic is my favourite, by far, but science is nuts.

PT_99

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

Mention any 3 7* cosmic who are top 6*

captain_rogers

Science

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Nah OP is right, Galan damage output is fixed, He only deals damage via harvest but problem is, let's say in bg, if his harvest fails to kill the opponent (leave them in like 15% ) then he have to trigger another harvest.

Also you're saying galan fell off because he is only available as 6*. Well Hulkling, CGR and herc are also only 6*s, but you can see them maxed out in almost every roster.

Is galan top 5? Idk he might be, But he definitely fell off a lot now compared to how good he was considered when he was released.

captain_rogers

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

Well While I agree galan fell off, Cosmic class might have probably the worst 7* roster tbh

ItsClobberinTime

Science

captain_rogers said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

1. If we're talking 6* only, Galan is definitely still top 5.
2. I know there are plenty of 7* that are better but that's only because of 7* stats, hence "if he was a 7*". Nobody was paying attention to Venom and Gamora before they were 7*, why do you think that is?

Nah OP is right, Galan damage output is fixed, He only deals damage via harvest but problem is, let's say in bg, if his harvest fails to kill the opponent (leave them in like 15% ) then he have to trigger another harvest.

Also you're saying galan fell off because he is only available as 6*. Well Hulkling, CGR and herc are also only 6*s, but you can see them maxed out in almost every roster.

Is galan top 5? Idk he might be, But he definitely fell off a lot now compared to how good he was considered when he was released.

Right? He has 7 disagrees 💀
Also no, the incinerates always finish off that last 15%. Again if you don't have a maxed Galan you wouldn't know, since you're saying all this you obviously don't.

Galan is maxed out in nearly every top roster too lmao what are you on about? He's not on every deck cause metas have been tricky lately but almost everyone has a maxed Galan.

He definitely fell off a bit but when it comes to 6* only, he's still top 5. For the sake of the argument though, even if he wasn't he'd still be top 10, you both are literally just arguing for the sake of arguing here. He is a top cosmic champ regardless, there's a reason he isn't a 7* yet, you can keep arguing all you want but it is what it is.

Yuvraj_267

Science

Ultragamer said:

ItsClobberinTime said:

Until we get champs like Hulkling and Galan as 7*, science imo.

Galan isn’t even top 5 cosmic 6* most of the really good cosmic are 7*

So, who are top 5 cosmics in your opinion