Witness the Great Revival! Act 6 Chapter 1 - Coming March 13th

1679111278

Comments

  • Maazlogan2321Maazlogan2321 Member Posts: 34
    @Kabam Miike will act 6 have locked view like act 5.4
  • This content has been removed.
  • Lovejoy72Lovejoy72 Member Posts: 1,858 ★★★★
    MaatMan said:

    also people who need to rely on the crutches that are champion synergies need to learn to adapt.

    yes synergies are great.
    yes they make things easier.

    but thats just it.
    they should make it easier for you to do things.
    not be the only way you are able to do things.

    if you need danger sense to kill modok you need to practice and learn to kil modok.
    if you need wasp to make ghost good you need to practice more and good without. yes it makes things easier much much easier to the point of almost too easy but she is still great by herself.

    I have 5/65 Medusa. i barely use royal family synergy.

    synergies make the job easier but should not be the crutch you rely upon.

    practice without, improve your skills, it may be hard, it may take time but your skills will improve and you will be a better player for it.

    I would buy that IF kabam had not spent the last 18 months buffing champs indirectly with synergies instead of directly changing champs. That is their process. They are going to have to work very hard to convince me this is not just a profit margin move.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,225 ★★★★★

    'special' doesn't mean useful.
    Whoever the special champ is I hope it'll be at least useful. Maybe useful than Deadpool Xforce, Kamala and Colossus

    Never know. Given the rarity, it could be The Collector.
  • LegendsendLegendsend Member Posts: 92
    Lovejoy72 said:



    I would buy that IF kabam had not spent the last 18 months buffing champs indirectly with synergies instead of directly changing champs. That is their process. They are going to have to work very hard to convince me this is not just a profit margin move.

    I was just saying this elsewhere. For the longest now Kabam has made characters who are nice only with synergies and instead of revamping some characters, has instead just made them a little better when used with a certain synergy. This seems to counter something they themself set up.
  • Markjv81Markjv81 Member Posts: 1,048 ★★★★
    MaatMan said:

    understand that you may be missing alot of 5*.
    i understand RNG can affect people poorly.
    but i have no doubt you have a chunk of perfectly useful 5*.
    after 4 years you must.
    You’re correct I have a number of 5/6* champs that will be useful, simply highlighting how ridiculous it is that I can’t bring 4* r5 god tier but can bring r1 5* trash champs. If the reason behind no 4* is to limit synergy then simply turn them off, if the reason is because 4* aren’t strong enough then anything under r3 5* should also be banned also.

    Eagerly awaiting kabams roughly our together explanation, that will more than likely pose more questions and confusion than answers.
  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★
    Lovejoy72 said:

    I would buy that IF kabam had not spent the last 18 months buffing champs indirectly with synergies instead of directly changing champs. That is their process. They are going to have to work very hard to convince me this is not just a profit margin move.
    yeah but it is also only 1 aspect of the game. itis act6.
    AQ, AW, EQ have not been announced to have this.
    story beyond Act 6 may not continue with this.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 20,709 Guardian
    SparkAlot said:

    Is this correct, or was this supposed to be published on April fools day?

    If you don't allow any 4* champs in Act 6 (goodbye synergies!) to begin with, then, why are you offering a 3* or 4* champ once you complete Act 6 to get the Cavaliers title in those crystals?

    It should be get a 5* or 6* or Awakening gem.
    Are you actually saying that completing Act 6 chapter 1 once should entitle you to buy 5* awakening gems for 200 units a piece? Because I see no other way to parse this post.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★
    it is most likely designed as a timefram kinda gate.
    if ur too new you wont have the roster.
    if ur older u will.

    i dont 100% like it.
    i dont 100% agree with it.
    but i kinda understand why.
    but really it is wat it is.
    thats wat they decided.
    complaining bout it is stupid and pointless.

    just gotta adjust and adapt.
    move forward make it happen.
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,689 ★★★★★
    edited March 2019
    .
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    As much as I disagree with the 5/6* champ requirement, I’ll just roll with it. Puts everyone on equal footing anyway. If you can’t use your 4*s and I can’t use mine, then it’s the same for you and me. No biggie.
  • John757John757 Member Posts: 1,088 ★★★
    V1PER1987 said:

    Not the same thing at all considering people pull different champs at different rarities.
    Wooooh there.... everyone doesn’t pull the same champs?!!?!
  • Bfyffe28Bfyffe28 Member Posts: 41
    xNig said:

    As much as I disagree with the 5/6* champ requirement, I’ll just roll with it. Puts everyone on equal footing anyway. If you can’t use your 4*s and I can’t use mine, then it’s the same for you and me. No biggie.

    I wish they’d announce tomorrow that they’ll allow 4 stars but disable all synergies. I have a feeling that would bring the big dogs to the forums to complain lol.
  • Doomsfist79Doomsfist79 Member Posts: 922 ★★★
    MaatMan said:

    it is most likely designed as a timefram kinda gate.
    if ur too new you wont have the roster.
    if ur older u will.

    i dont 100% like it.
    i dont 100% agree with it.
    but i kinda understand why.
    but really it is wat it is.
    thats wat they decided.
    complaining bout it is stupid and pointless.

    just gotta adjust and adapt.
    move forward make it happen.

    Not really.. they released 12.0... things changed.. they wanted to remove diversity... things changed.. they changed war start times.. things changed.. so no.. don't really have to adjust and adapt.. more like show that if the changes go forward the company stops making money.. that will make them change..
  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★
    Markjv81 said:

    You’re correct I have a number of 5/6* champs that will be useful, simply highlighting how ridiculous it is that I can’t bring 4* r5 god tier but can bring r1 5* trash champs. If the reason behind no 4* is to limit synergy then simply turn them off, if the reason is because 4* aren’t strong enough then anything under r3 5* should also be banned also.

    Eagerly awaiting kabams roughly our together explanation, that will more than likely pose more questions and confusion than answers.
    not saying i agree with and like this choice.
    but it is wat it is and i will deal with it.

    just gotta move forward and plan how to do act 6 once we see it
  • This content has been removed.
  • loader187loader187 Member Posts: 222 ★★

    Why no 4*s allowed? My only 6* is trash and i have only a few good 5*s

    I have to agree with this guy and with seatin. Kabam thank you for breaking all my synergy groups. We still use 4* and why now. If we want to use a 1* than we should be able too. You can use 1-6* in act 5. in one act you take away all characters up to 5*. Not all of us are the "Crystal opening whale" and have every character.

    Give us one good reason we shouldn't be able to use any character?
  • Markjv81Markjv81 Member Posts: 1,048 ★★★★
    MaatMan said:

    not saying i agree with and like this choice.
    but it is wat it is and i will deal with it.

    just gotta move forward and plan how to do act 6 once we see it
    See that’s where you’re wrong, enough people voiced their displeasure about the AW start time and it was changed to suit, it appears the squeaky wheel gets the grease around here.
  • MJDEMONMJDEMON Member Posts: 1
    So why are cavalier crystals including 3 and 4 star champs? Not like you can use them in act 6. When are we getting a Scarlet Witch 5 star?
  • loader187loader187 Member Posts: 222 ★★

    Hey everybody,

    We're seeing your concerns, and desire for more clarification on the Champion Requirements. We're going to write something up to clearly present our intentions with these requirements and their purpose. We don't want to create any more confusion, so we're going to take our time with this. We'll have something to give you insight into our intentions tomorrow.

    If your not going to allow us to use 4* in act 6 than stop giving us free 2*. I would say 1% of the game players want a 2* for collecting purposes and most of us have enough 2* for your random arena 2* event. I could understand removing 1-3* for Act 6 but 4*. I know I would never use 1-3* in Act 6 but I would use 4* especially for synergies. some people even like to test their skills and try to beat quests with 3* characters just for fun. those same people are going to want to try with 4* now.
  • JimmyJohnJonesJimmyJohnJones Member Posts: 81
    @Kabam Miike can you confirm that the 4* lockout is only for Chapter 1? A lot of folks seem to be assuming/misreading it as for all of act 6.
  • Doomsfist79Doomsfist79 Member Posts: 922 ★★★

    @Kabam Miike can you confirm that the 4* lockout is only for Chapter 1? A lot of folks seem to be assuming/misreading it as for all of act 6.

    Really dude?? Why would the restriction be there for chapter 1.. but not the rest of the act? That would make absolutely no sense..
  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★

    Is this a joke? Did Colossus undergo a buff that I didn't know about? *checks champion description* Oh no he didn't, he doesn't have poison immunity. Please, read the abilities of the champions you're going to use to justify this gatekeeping.
    yeah ok... my bad...
    but my point still stands....
    regardless of how bad you percieve a champ to be they.
    colossus is bleed immune, groot is bleed immune, hulk, cap marvel is poison immune... etc etc...
Sign In or Register to comment.