Witness the Great Revival! Act 6 Chapter 1 - Coming March 13th

1434446484978

Comments

  • Jman2182Jman2182 Posts: 97
    As a reminder for everyone, we encourage debate and won’t shy away from criticism however we expect all users to treat each other with respect.

    Insults, personal attacks, harassment, inflammatory posting, or generally rude posts will not be tolerated in either the forums, or private messages. This also includes the use of inappropriate, vulgar, discriminatory or offensive language of any kind.


    ^^^
    How much u want to bet that Kabam made this because of the controversy of the 4* ban.
  • Doomsfist79Doomsfist79 Posts: 281 ★★
    Ace_03 said:

    Limiting conditions that discourage skill and roster planning, goes against every principle that the game is founded upon. These 7 day dramatic meta shifts are also very poorly executed.

    Let us use our rosters, enough with these restrictions, don't create more discontempt.

    The game is founded on the principle of making money.. people really seem to think kabam cares what the players think or want.. I keep saying it.. if people want kabam to change their mind.. then stop spending money.. 2 days of no revenue due to this 4* thing and the decision would be reversed.. simple as that
  • UmbertoDelRioUmbertoDelRio Posts: 2,229 ★★★★
    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
  • ezmoneyezmoney Posts: 208

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
    You spam... what you're doing is spamming. You've stated your incorrect opinion already. Repeating it 30 more times isnt necessary.
  • Austin555555Austin555555 Posts: 2,039 ★★★★
    edited March 10
    If I give my honest thoughts on this topic, it will be removed for hate speech when it probably won’t
  • ezmoneyezmoney Posts: 208

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
    you post 12 times a day kid. That's insane. What's your ign. I bet you arent even ready for act 6 and you're just being dim and want to try and ensight rage. Which you won't get troll. You even english??? umberto?
  • 4Never4Never Posts: 68


    Let's look at this from a players point of view....




    This whole game has a fundamental basis in **building a roster**, which means acquiring the most powerful champs now, AND using lesser *s to fill in gaps for synergy or champ utility, where RNG has not favored us, to accomplish tasks/complete content. I would say that is one of MCOC's most appealing features (that we love), as with any collection based game. We take pride in what we have built, and get the sense of continued value with present use. Kabam wants to remove that from significant, upcoming content eagerly awaited by the player base. (Sure, the gate doesn't apply to all content, but if anything, this one would be most significant. As well as, even more broad restrictions to follow.)
    From the vast majority of player's POV, there isn't anything appealing about a game design that removes that fundamental appeal in such a broad sweep in forward moving content. Some may be indifferent, and even less, accepting.


    Did Kabam really expect players to jump up and down with excitement over the 4* gate?!!! Seriously!
    What player is saying to themselves, "Wow, what a great decision. I wish I would have thought of not using any lesser *s. I should just start playing all future content with only 5* and 6* champs, even where there is no gate. It will thoroughly enrich my game, and play experience by making significant moments (etc), and vastly make this game more fun." NO ONE!!!!


    We tolerate or even find it acceptably challenging to see *some, limited* champ restrictions here and there (path or chapter), because we might explore other champs for the task, but an entire gate of 4* or less, is absurd. That doesn't make anything more challenging, or move us to other strategies. It simply just [[ creates a demand ]] for a higher * champ, that we most likely already have in a lesser *. That's the contradiction, and why players are upset (and where the cash grab theories come from). It doesn't make sense, especially given the explanation you have given, and goes against what we love about MCOC.

  • UmbertoDelRioUmbertoDelRio Posts: 2,229 ★★★★
    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
    You spam... what you're doing is spamming. You've stated your incorrect opinion already. Repeating it 30 more times isnt necessary.
    So you're not going to read it then? In that case, please stop responding as long as you aren't willing to put any substance into this general discussion. That would actually be considered spamming.
  • ezmoneyezmoney Posts: 208

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
    You spam... what you're doing is spamming. You've stated your incorrect opinion already. Repeating it 30 more times isnt necessary.
    So you're not going to read it then? In that case, please stop responding as long as you aren't willing to put any substance into this general discussion. That would actually be considered spamming.
    lol you provide no value ... just nonsense. what's your ign?
  • IsItthoughIsItthough Posts: 208 ★★
    I still think it comes down to synergies for a lot of people. Those that grinder forn hiemdal or need a 4star for one of there trinities. That’s my biggest issue with it. When you have nodes that will put degen on you ever evade it’s important to have champs like Ghulk. But if you are not fortunate to have one in 5 or 6 star, and you do in 4star you should be able to try him. It’s just a bad look, then top it off the BIG win is a crystal that stills gives you 3star champs. LoL
  • Dexman1349Dexman1349 Posts: 3,060 ★★★★★

    I probably spend $30 a month on this game for units or other offers that are worth the value. I am personally not spending a dime unless this is overturned. I was genuinely excited for this content but now not so much.

    Anyone else still spending?

    Haven't spent a dime since the $1 player's choice crystal offer was out. Ironically enough, that crystal was for a 4* champ...
  • UmbertoDelRioUmbertoDelRio Posts: 2,229 ★★★★
    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    ezmoney said:

    Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.

    Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators?
    Ad revenue. Nothing more.
    yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
    First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though.
    This might help you understand the concept.

    Moving on.

    Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire.
    It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work.
    Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
    i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
    513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
    You even english...? Please, stay on topic.

    Did you read the message yet?
    The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
    And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?

    Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:

    Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.

    Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.

    I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.

    Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e.
    See the difference?
    you post 12 times a day kid. That's insane. What's your ign. I bet you arent even ready for act 6 and you're just being dim and want to try and ensight rage. Which you won't get troll. You even english??? umberto?
    I already said how I'm not ready for act 6 and never said I was. Just a few comments ago actually.

    But thanks for showing that you can't even read comments. Tells a lot, mate.

    Also the fact that you seem to see "reading comprehension" as "nonsense".

    "[...] and Rarity requirements where you must bring [X] amount of 5-Star or 6-Star Champions to complete the quest path."

    This right here is the part you saw other people mention (let's face it, you won't read it no matter what). So, to stay on topic, where exactly does it say anything about a 5* ban/restriction? This actually comes down to semantics a little bit, so be careful about how words work.
  • Alpha07Alpha07 Posts: 649 ★★
    edited March 10
    Leaving the no 4* BS aside I was honestly expecting to see an 5* Class AG.

    btw, I am honestly hating on how there's no control on who you bring into this Act (which is the strategy part of this game). people fill some roster voids with 1-2 4* because they have been not lucky enough to have some champion as a 5-6*. I can see more use of my 4* AA than my 5* Hulkbuster or 6* Storm.
  • TyEdgeTyEdge Posts: 227
    edited March 10


    How would you feel if they brought back the old feature crystal but not for the brand new champs but something like they did with Blade? Maybe they could run it for a discount of 12k shards and that would let people at least zero in on specific champs and might not effect crystal sales to much. I know if they came out with an Omega Red crystal I’d be all in.
    This is genius. Modified idea - all pre-Blade champs can re-run on an announced schedule for a price between a feature and basic. We all know new champs are better. I don’t need everyone with a Corvus.
  • ezmoneyezmoney Posts: 208

    People will be fine. The ones who complain are the ones who will not complete this because they don’t have the roster size. Why bring a 4 star to a fight with 100% degen of the defenders base attack. That’s a KO after 2.5 seconds lol

    Noones bringing a 4* to fight.. they'll bring them for synergies.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,468 ★★★★★
    edited March 10

    People will be fine. The ones who complain are the ones who will not complete this because they don’t have the roster size. Why bring a 4 star to a fight with 100% degen of the defenders base attack. That’s a KO after 2.5 seconds lol

    I agree. People will get through it. The community always finds a solution. Even among the Mid-Tier 5*s, it's possible to find the best possible options. That's just what we do. We find the easiest ways through it. As for Rosters, I can't really comment on who is and who isn't ready, but I've always maintained an attitude of not adhering to the God Tier List alone. It's really wise to look at all options openly. Otherwise you could be sitting around waiting for the perfect Champs, instead of trying to find the best option with what you currently have. It's always an option for people to wait on better pulls, but that doesn't mean they don't have options that are doable. It really just depends on how motivated people are. All this energy on arguing and fighting it could be spent examining what options are workable given the Nodes.
  • zeezee57zeezee57 Posts: 1,850 ★★★★
    edited March 10

    People will be fine. The ones who complain are the ones who will not complete this because they don’t have the roster size. Why bring a 4 star to a fight with 100% degen of the defenders base attack. That’s a KO after 2.5 seconds lol

    All due respect but this is nothing but baseless assumption and nothing more. I'm vehemently against this nonsense and and i assure you ill have zero issue with my initial clear of 6.1 this week regardless if the restriction stays. Players put lots of time and effort into their rosters, and that includes 4* champs. I for one enjoy playing new champs and have zero chance at adding them as 5* so I grab them from the featured 4* arena. Would i use them a ton in act 6? Of course not, but why isn't that my decision to make? I grinded for them and I invested my time and resources into them. This isn't a side quest or challenge, it's story mode, the backbone of a game like this and placing restrictions like this on it is plain garbage.

    If there's a rage path I need to complete why can't i use the 4* counters to that node I've invested in leveling up to support my main roster? Or a Mephisto boss, why can't I bring my 5/50 sig 99 Void is built up specifically for a Mephisto counter? There's no sound justification for it being presented because there's no sound justification for it. Players are pissed because they just want to use the characters they've built up and are being told they can't because they dont have good enough luck to pull them as a 5* yet. 4* are the highest rarity players have any say over having a specific champ and this makes roster construction for Act 6 100% RNG based, why would anyone be happy with that?

    P.s. this b.s. here is the lone reason I didn't bother adding the new Captain Marvel to my roster. Had every intent on getting her from the 4* arena and using my 4* cosmic AG and 4-5 rank gem on her. Knowing 4* won't even be allowed into act 6 makes the time investment really not worth the effort.
Sign In or Register to comment.